Loading. Please Wait... 
 |
 |
 |
HV Questions Thread, For questions about how it works |
|
Aug 12 2011, 01:32
|
DarkDespair5
Group: Gold Star Club
Posts: 898
Joined: 20-December 10

|
QUOTE(Kjaskar @ Aug 10 2011, 07:22)  Heh i got a weird question. I calculated my burden from items and its exactly 19.7. Will system round it up to 20 and will i get affected by that "crap"when you got >20 burden?
No you won't. Every point of Burden above 20 lowers Action Speed by 1. That's all Burden does.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Aug 12 2011, 04:35
|
skillchip
Group: Catgirl Camarilla
Posts: 5,754
Joined: 31-December 06

|
QUOTE(dkplee @ Aug 11 2011, 23:20)  Yes, Tenboro's confirmed both. I'm too lazy to search for his posts, so I'll go off my memory here.
The chance to receive a gift = (number of hours since you last checked this monster) * (number of battles won since you last received an item from this monster)
Once the game has done a check, one hour must pass by before you can do another check for the same monster. Quality of items is a random number between 1-1000 added to the monster's power level. If the result is less than 750, then you find a low-quality item. If the result is 1250 or higher, you find a high-quality item. If the result is in between, you find a medium-quality item.
Special items, like bindings and those phazon/kevlar items can be found with any level of monster, they are just a rare occurance. Should be similar to how special items like soul stones/bubble gum are in the loot table
I think your formula is worded wrong Gift Chance = (number of hours since you last RECEIVED a gift from this monster) * (number of battles won since you last received an item from this monster) So checking every hour doesn't hurt your chances IIRC EX monster has 10 wins. Check @ hr 1: 10% Check again @ hr 2: 20% Check again @ hr 3: 30% and so on, once you get something both reset
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Aug 12 2011, 06:44
|
dkplee
Group: Members
Posts: 1,540
Joined: 13-May 10

|
IIRC, checking resets the number of hours in that formula to 0, so my wording should be correct. edit: You made my actually search it, so... here you go: QUOTE(Tenboro @ Jul 11 2011, 13:17)  Well, the way it works right now is, when you enter the monster screen it will roll on it if it's been more than one hour since you last checked. The number of hours (not rounded) is multiplied with the number of battles the monster has won since last time it brought you a gift.
So if it's been three and a half hours since you last checked, and it's won five battles since it last gave you something, your "score" is 17.5. This score then has to be higher than a random roll from 0 to 100 - in this case, a 17.5% chance. If you do not get an item, the last-checked timer is is reset to the current time, so if you check one hour later (and it didn't get any more kills), the chance would be 5%.
Note that your score can go above 100, in which case it's a guaranteed drop.
I don't think there's a statistical advantage to checking less often, but if someone wants to model it, go right ahead. There will be a disadvantage to checking too seldom, that is, having the score go above 100. Yes.
From this postThis post has been edited by dkplee: Aug 12 2011, 06:52
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Aug 12 2011, 06:55
|
skillchip
Group: Catgirl Camarilla
Posts: 5,754
Joined: 31-December 06

|
I thought tens said that it doenst reset that, otherwise checking every hour would statistically hurt your chances over time of getting an item and he said that the math makes it so checking constantly doesnt hurt it
then again it may turn into something like ratings where it works but no one knows how eventually
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
Aug 12 2011, 10:30
|
@43883
Group: Gold Star Club
Posts: 31,488
Joined: 6-March 08

|
QUOTE(skillchip @ Aug 12 2011, 06:55)  I thought tens said that it doenst reset that, otherwise checking every hour would statistically hurt your chances over time of getting an item and he said that the math makes it so checking constantly doesnt hurt it QUOTE I don't think there's a statistical advantage to checking less often, but if someone wants to model it, go right ahead. And the important part : QUOTE There will be a disadvantage to checking too seldom, that is, having the score go above 100. Let's say you have a monster. Let's name it J (for Jane, Joe, Crossdressing Joe/Jane, V-Joe or P-Jane, whatever your personal perverted preferences are). Let's assume J wins a constant 1 battle every hour over a period of 10 hours, totaling 10 wins after 10 hours. #1 : Optimal check. You check once after 10 hours to get a guaranteed drop with a sharp 100% chance. #2 : Gambling. You check every hour at increasing chances until you actually get something. In the worst case situation, you'll end up rolling ten failed attempts with the first one at a 1% chance and the last one at a 10% chance. In the best case situation (pretty unlikely with the current formula), you'll gain 10 materials. Now back to reality. There is no way to exactly tell how many wins your monsters will get after X hours in order to get optimal odds. Still, I don't think Tenboro wants us to be able to easily gain at lot of materials. This post has been edited by Mika Kurogane: Aug 12 2011, 10:31
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Aug 12 2011, 11:51
|
DarkDespair5
Group: Gold Star Club
Posts: 898
Joined: 20-December 10

|
#1 is indeed optimal. The "expected value" for hourly checking @ Mika's scenario is .01 + .02 + .03 + .04 + .05 + .06 + .07 + .08 + .09 + .1 = 0.55 Drops/10h You are indeed being penalized on average for checking too often.
This post has been edited by DarkDespair5: Aug 12 2011, 11:53
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Aug 12 2011, 13:19
|
Tenboro

|
QUOTE(DarkDespair5 @ Aug 12 2011, 11:51)  The "expected value" for hourly checking @ Mika's scenario is .01 + .02 + .03 + .04 + .05 + .06 + .07 + .08 + .09 + .1 = 0.55 Drops/10h Eh, no. Modeling this isn't trivial since the probability is variable. But you can trivially calculate the odds of getting at least one item by hour X by calculating the odds of not getting one, and you should be able to model it more thoroughly by calculating a cumulative distribution function on a gamma distribution, but I honestly can't be arsed. If you simplify it somewhat and say that the monster kills stay fixed at say 10, you can use simple binomial probability to do it. In which case, the odds of getting exactly k drops is nCk * p^k * (1-p) ^ (n - k). Or specifically: 0: 0.348 1: 0.387 2: 0.198 3: 0.057 4: 0.011 5: 0.0015 6+: <0.2% chance So the average drops in a ten-hour period with checking once every hour would be about 0 * 0.348 + 1 * 0.387 + 2 * 0.198 + 3 * 0.057 + 4 * 0.011 + 5 * 0.0015 + insignificant ~= 1.01, compared to a fixed 1 for just checking on the 10th hour.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Aug 12 2011, 15:41
|
Ballistic9
Group: Members
Posts: 4,761
Joined: 4-January 09

|
what
|
|
|
Aug 13 2011, 06:33
|
Vasistas
Group: Gold Star Club
Posts: 2,260
Joined: 2-April 11

|
39 1 You gain 0 points of two-handed weapon proficiency
is this normal?
|
|
|
Aug 13 2011, 08:04
|
Maximum_Joe
Group: Gold Star Club
Posts: 24,074
Joined: 17-April 11

|
Rounding error; you capped in 2H?
|
|
|
Aug 13 2011, 09:28
|
Vasistas
Group: Gold Star Club
Posts: 2,260
Joined: 2-April 11

|
yes, but that went too fast. I didn't expekt building up the last 0,5 prof in just some hell arena
|
|
|
Aug 13 2011, 22:19
|
Kjaskar
Lurker
Group: Recruits
Posts: 6
Joined: 7-August 11

|
QUOTE(DarkDespair5 @ Aug 12 2011, 01:32)  No you won't. Every point of Burden above 20 lowers Action Speed by 1. That's all Burden does.
As far as i know if you wear cloth and have >20 your spell have a chance to fail or something....
|
|
|
Aug 13 2011, 23:32
|
DarkDespair5
Group: Gold Star Club
Posts: 898
Joined: 20-December 10

|
QUOTE(Kjaskar @ Aug 13 2011, 15:19)  As far as i know if you wear cloth and have >20 your spell have a chance to fail or something....
That's interference.
|
|
|
Aug 13 2011, 23:43
|
DarkDespair5
Group: Gold Star Club
Posts: 898
Joined: 20-December 10

|
QUOTE(Mika Kurogane @ Aug 12 2011, 07:29)  WA is pretty helpful when you're lazy. Still technically higher than 1, so you're right. (IMG:[ invalid] style_emoticons/default/rolleyes.gif) @ Tenboro: Thanks for that (IMG:[ invalid] style_emoticons/default/smile.gif) I can't believe I screwed up independent probability. >.< @All: The problem is what if your monster gets different amount of kills at different PLs or changes killrate due to patch changes, or gets 26 one day and 3 the next...mind blown. This post has been edited by DarkDespair5: Aug 14 2011, 00:07
|
|
|
Aug 15 2011, 17:57
|
Randommember
Group: Gold Star Club
Posts: 3,447
Joined: 13-November 10

|
What is the posting bonus in exp? And how big is it, how long does it last, etc?
|
|
|
Aug 15 2011, 19:43
|
@43883
Group: Gold Star Club
Posts: 31,488
Joined: 6-March 08

|
QUOTE(Randommember @ Aug 15 2011, 17:57)  What is the posting bonus in exp? And how big is it, how long does it last, etc?
Something like :
CODE bonus = log(post_count)/2 * 100 where post_count represents how many posts you've made on the current day. Apparently obsolete. Sorry. (IMG:[ invalid] style_emoticons/default/rolleyes.gif) Caps at 100% for 10 posts. It's a daily bonus. It's also additive with the XP Boost ability and the Adept Learner training, so it will make those other two look less impressive if you train them. You may want to check this thread as well. (IMG:[ invalid] style_emoticons/default/smile.gif) This post has been edited by Mika Kurogane: Aug 15 2011, 21:26
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Aug 15 2011, 20:21
|
Zero Angel
Group: Gold Star Club
Posts: 11,314
Joined: 29-December 07

|
QUOTE(Mika Kurogane @ Aug 16 2011, 01:43)  Something like : CODE bonus = log(post_count)/2 * 100 where post_count represents how many posts you've made on the current day. Caps at 100% for 100 posts. It's a daily bonus. It's also additive with the XP Boost ability and the Adept Learner training, so it will make those other two look less impressive if you train them. QUOTE(Tenboro @ Jul 30 2011, 03:18)  I'm sure you can manage to scare up ten posts a day to keep your bonus maxed even without using the Spamhaus.
So... did it really get changed to only 10 posts to max the bonus?
|
|
|
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
|
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|