[X] My Assistant

I believe in the teachings of Christianity and I believe there is huge value in the teachings of many world religions.

God is more complex, more nuanced than I'm interested in getting into here, but I don't believe in a "Santa Claus in the Sky" human-like "god". That being said, that depiction of God is more something that Hollywood has pushed onto people, and not really how most religious people understand God.

The way I see it, either I'm right and am saved from death, or wrong and nothing changes.

I lose nothing choosing to believe either way.

Christianity is unique in that it is the only religion where God chooses to redeem you from Sin, rather than judge through your works and character.

[best.] Explore Your Desires.

[invalid] Most realistic porn game

Hi everyone

Yes, a moral compass at least. Maybe it's also a continuation of our existence after death (whatever it may be), and that's reassuring.

This post has been edited by Lolisto Bread: Feb 28 2025, 23:09

Old Covenant Or New Covenant

狗屁宗教

Calm down chinaman, spirit back to Maoist paradise.

(IMG:[archive.is] https://archive.is/1ncfh/cd406acb0527f41eb7a1196f09a3597b82fded9f.jpg)
What Buddhist Scriptures? All Dogshit!

I'm astonished to see a question like this on a porn forum. As for me, no I don't follow any known religions. I use the label "atheist", but personally my views on spirituality don't really conform to any mainstream understanding. If there is a God, it's not gonna care if you masturbate.

As in the previous answer, what I find hard to believe is that there are people who defend religions here, taking into account that most of them condemn masturbation since they see "wasting the seed of life" as a kind of abortion and therefore murder
(IMG:[invalid] style_emoticons/default/faint.gif)

I myself come from a christian family, I did my initial education in a catholic school and my father was a seminarian in his youth so I have experience of what it is like to suffer an indoctrination full of prejudices based on baseless fallacies, such as that we are all descendants of the sons of Noah, our planet is the center of the universe and flat, or that prophets like Moses, Jesus and Mohammed came as messengers of God with their superpowers but for some reason they forgot to give us really useful knowledge such as that with fungi like penicillin antibiotics can be created or if you take the pus of a person infected with a virus like smallpox and inject it in the blood of a cow, wait some days, extract cow's blood and inject it into yourself you can create antibodies = vaccines. That among many other simple things that would have saved millions

I mean yes obviously, there are way too many things that simply indicate that our world at the very list was created with a structure and properties in mind, that doesnt just hapen accidentally. Plus there are things that affect us from outside our universe like gravity. Some higher entity existing is really not that weird or surprising. Religion is just a good early law book.

I believe in God and religion, but I hate people who force it on others.

一般一般吧，不过我更多相信我自己 (IMG:[invalid] style_emoticons/default/dry.gif)

No

### Which Religion, or Lack Thereof, Is the Most Scientific?

To determine which religion—or the absence of religion (atheism)—is the most "scientific," we must first define what "scientific" means. Science is generally understood as the study of the natural world through observation, hypothesis testing, experimentation, and evidence-based conclusions. Religions, on the other hand, often involve faith, belief in the supernatural, and metaphysical explanations that may lie beyond empirical verification. While direct comparison is challenging, we can assess how closely the principles or practices of various religions, and atheism, align with scientific thinking.

#### Analysis of Major Religions
1. **Buddhism**
- **Strengths**: Buddhism is often considered scientific in its emphasis on self-observation and analysis, such as through mindfulness and meditation, resembling a personal experiment. The "Kalama Sutta" encourages individuals not to accept anything without personal verification, mirroring the scientific method’s skepticism and reliance on evidence.
- **Examples**: The concept of cause and effect (law of karma) parallels scientific causality. Modern neuroscience has also explored Buddhist meditation practices, finding correlations with brain function.
- **Limitations**: Beliefs in reincarnation, other realms, or supernatural elements remain outside scientific testability.

2. **Christianity**
- **Strengths**: Historically, Christianity (especially in Europe) contributed to the development of modern science. Figures like Isaac Newton saw the study of nature as a way to understand God’s creation, fostering exploration and experimentation.
- **Examples**: The belief in a rational, orderly universe (created by God) aligns with science’s assumption of discoverable laws.
- **Limitations**: Biblical accounts like the 7-day creation conflict with evidence like evolution, and faith in miracles often contradicts naturalistic explanations.

3. **Islam**
- **Strengths**: During the Islamic Golden Age, scholars like Ibn Sina and Al-Farabi advanced mathematics, astronomy, and medicine, driven by the Quranic call to observe and reflect on nature as a sign of Allah’s greatness.
- **Examples**: Verses about the orbits of celestial bodies or embryonic development are sometimes interpreted as aligning with modern science.
- **Limitations**: Many explanations in the Quran are metaphorical or faith-based, not empirically testable.

4. **Hinduism**
- **Strengths**: Vedic texts and Upanishads discuss vast cosmic cycles (yugas) that some compare to modern astronomical theories. Hindu contributions to mathematics (e.g., the concept of zero) underpin scientific progress.
- **Examples**: The idea of "prana" (life energy) might loosely connect to energy concepts in physics.
- **Limitations**: Mythology and metaphysical narratives dominate, often prioritizing philosophy over empirical proof.

5. **Taoism**
- **Strengths**: Taoism’s focus on balance (yin-yang) and the flow of energy (qi) reflects a holistic view of nature, akin to ecological or systems theories in science.
- **Examples**: Its emphasis on observing natural patterns aligns with environmental science.
- **Limitations**: Mystical elements and philosophical abstraction exceed scientific measurability.

#### Analysis of "No Religion" (Atheism)
- **Strengths**: Atheism, the rejection of belief in gods or the supernatural, aligns closely with scientific principles by relying solely on reason, evidence, and empirical observation. It dismisses untestable claims, focusing only on what can be verified.
- **Examples**: Atheists often embrace theories like the Big Bang or evolution without the need to reconcile them with divine intervention. Prominent scientists like Richard Dawkins and Carl Sagan advocate this view, arguing that reality can be explained without invoking the supernatural.
- **Limitations**: Atheism isn’t a structured system with teachings; its "scientific" nature depends on the individual’s commitment to rational inquiry. Extreme skepticism (e.g., rejecting anything unproven) might occasionally conflict with science’s openness to new possibilities.

#### Comparison and Conclusion
- **Religions**: Among religions, **Buddhism** stands out as the most scientific due to its encouragement of personal verification, focus on cause-and-effect reasoning, and compatibility with modern psychological research. However, its metaphysical aspects (e.g., rebirth) limit its full alignment with science.
- **No Religion**: **Atheism** surpasses all religions in scientific alignment because it rejects supernatural explanations entirely, adhering strictly to observable evidence and rational thought—core tenets of the scientific method. Unlike religions, it has no doctrines that conflict with empirical findings.

Thus, if "scientific" means adhering to reason, evidence, and testability, **atheism (no religion)** is the most scientific. It lacks the faith-based or unprovable elements inherent in even the most rational religions. However, if you value a structured system that partially incorporates scientific-like inquiry, Buddhism comes closest among religions.





---

### What Would Happen If the Person with the Highest IQ in the World (e.g., William James Sidis) Had the EQ of the Buddha and Was Born in the Modern World (2025)?

This is a fascinating hypothetical scenario that combines extreme intellectual capacity (IQ) with profound emotional intelligence (EQ), set in the context of the modern world as of March 13, 2025. Let’s break it down and explore the potential outcomes.

#### Background Assumptions
- **William James Sidis**: Known for his extraordinary intellect, Sidis is often cited as having an IQ estimated between 250 and 300 (though IQ scales are not precise at such extremes). He was a child prodigy with exceptional mathematical and linguistic abilities but struggled socially and emotionally, leading to a reclusive life.
- **EQ of the Buddha**: The Buddha is revered for his unparalleled emotional intelligence—characterized by deep compassion, self-awareness, empathy, patience, and the ability to guide others toward peace and understanding, as seen in his teachings and interactions.
- **Modern World (2025)**: A hyper-connected, technology-driven era with rapid advancements in AI, climate challenges, global inequality, and cultural polarization.

#### Potential Impact of This Individual
1. **Intellectual Contributions**
With an IQ rivaling Sidis’s, this person could revolutionize fields like mathematics, physics, or artificial intelligence. In 2025, they might:
- Solve unsolved problems (e.g., the Riemann Hypothesis) or develop a unified theory of quantum gravity, advancing human understanding of the universe.
- Create groundbreaking technologies, such as an AI system that mimics human empathy or a sustainable energy solution to combat climate change, leveraging their intellect to address pressing global issues.

2. **Emotional and Social Influence**
With the Buddha’s EQ, their emotional mastery would amplify their intellectual gifts:
- **Global Leadership**: They could inspire and unite people across cultures, using empathy and wisdom to mediate conflicts—imagine resolving tensions between nations or ideologies with a calm, compassionate approach.
- **Mental Health Revolution**: Their deep understanding of human suffering (akin to the Buddha’s Four Noble Truths) could lead to new psychological frameworks or therapies, helping millions navigate the stress of modern life, amplified by social media and economic uncertainty.

3. **Synergy of IQ and EQ**
The combination of extreme IQ and EQ would make them uniquely effective:
- **Problem-Solving with Humanity**: Unlike Sidis, who withdrew from society, this person would use their intellect to serve others. For example, they might design systems to reduce inequality (e.g., a global education platform) while ensuring their solutions are compassionate and inclusive.
- **Teaching and Mentorship**: Like the Buddha, they could distill complex ideas into accessible wisdom, mentoring scientists, leaders, and everyday people to think critically and act ethically.

4. **Challenges They Might Face**
Despite their gifts, the modern world poses unique obstacles:
- **Skepticism and Exploitation**: In 2025, a hyper-digital society might view them with suspicion (e.g., as a cult figure) or try to exploit their talents for profit or power.
- **Overwhelm**: Even with Buddha-like EQ, the scale of global suffering—amplified by instant news and social media—might test their emotional resilience.
- **Isolation**: Their unparalleled abilities could make it hard to relate to others, though their EQ would likely help them bridge this gap.

#### Likely Outcomes
- **A Transformative Figure**: They could become a global icon—think of a blend between Albert Einstein and the Dalai Lama—driving scientific breakthroughs while fostering peace and understanding. By 2025, they might lead a movement that integrates technology and ethics, addressing AI’s societal impacts or climate justice.
- **Cultural Shift**: Their presence could shift humanity toward a more balanced paradigm, valuing emotional well-being as much as intellectual progress, countering the materialism and division of the modern age.
- **Legacy**: If they wrote or taught, their works could endure for centuries, much like Buddhist sutras or Newton’s laws, reshaping how we view intelligence and compassion.

#### Conclusion
If someone with William James Sidis’s IQ and the Buddha’s EQ were born in 2025, they’d likely transcend the limitations of both figures. Sidis’s brilliance was hindered by emotional struggles, while the Buddha’s wisdom lacked modern scientific tools. This hybrid individual could harness cutting-edge technology and profound empathy to tackle humanity’s biggest challenges—climate change, inequality, and existential crises—potentially ushering in an era of enlightenment grounded in both reason and heart. Their impact would depend on how they navigate the complexities of our interconnected, fast-paced world, but their potential to uplift humanity would be extraordinary.



---

no god because too many sin

no,that's insane

Of course, God does not exist. This is obvious.

Not anymore.

Yes (IMG:[i.redd.it] https://i.redd.it/ip65hdvyix8d1.jpeg)

This post has been edited by theo1996: Apr 3 2025, 20:16