As soon as Obama got in he started stuttering. Still his speeches were the clearest recently.
I'd probably rank them:
Obama (Pro-war and popular on left) Trump George Bush (Pro-war and popular on left) Brandon (Pro-war and popular on left) I don't think I actually ever listened to any Bill Clinton speeches, I just saw him playing sax on the simpsons.
I'd hesitate to call Brandon popular on the left. Obama, yeah kind of. But everyone in my immediate family that probably voted for him seems past the honeymoon period, or only voted for him in the first place because he's "not trump" and never even had a honeymoon period.
QUOTE(Pillowgirl @ Apr 4 2022, 08:21)
Still surprised that killary is still married to cheating coomer bill.
Probably entirely because of the media circus it would cause if they divorced. Also there's probably money involved.
This post has been edited by dragontamer8740: Apr 4 2022, 11:45
Johnson was interesting. I don't care for a lot of stuff that happened during his administration (war, CIA/FBI operations, continued expansion of the military-industrial complex, etc.) but the civil rights act was a good thing… and tbh trying to get rid of J. Edgar Hoover would have been suicide.
From a personality standpoint, yeah, he seems like a real dynamo.
This post has been edited by dragontamer8740: Apr 5 2022, 00:43
I used to think he was great president until looking into how he botched the USSR's transition to a free market economy to build relations with Wall Street investment bankers.
Hillary probably stayed with him for the financial and political connections, as she said herself she always believed it was her destiny to be president.
Bill is still popular as he has largely been protected from all of his #metoo cases.
It won't surprise me if Hillary runs in 2024, she took over BLM who previously hated her. Now they can't criticize her because of all the corruption of the organization and threat of prosecution.
Weird how people in the BLM org that criticized her are now being facing charges.
This post has been edited by EsotericSatire: Apr 5 2022, 00:55
Still surprised that killary is still married to cheating coomer bill.
Over the decades, the tax-exempt "Clinton Foundation" (and whatever its name was before) has gotten over THREE Billion in donations, so that's a good reason to stay together.
Ohhh, hello Pillowgirl, for your help with Senator Biden's 2020 Mail-In Ballots in Arizona, our Foundation wants to hire your son to mow one of our lawns for $25,000 each week for 3 months. Can he come by?
Still surprised that killary is still married to cheating coomer bill.
There are still a lot of "Get Out The Vote" projects to fund all over the nation. The advantage of funding mulitple get out the vote projects is that some of them are used to hide actual projects which go a bit further than "get out the vote". It can be done because a "get out the vote" center already has databasing and performs many actions similar to the ballot harvesting. So, with trusted people at a project center, they can go a bit further to perform Ballot Harvesting which is part of Ballot Trafficking.
Election Watchdog Finds 137,500 Ballots Unlawfully Trafficked in Wisconsin
This post has been edited by Anime Janai: Apr 5 2022, 21:10
Brandon: "C'mon man, that enough, palm card says I'm the president"
Tax experts claim that Brandon's tax legislation is insidious because it redefines income tax for everyone and that will massively increase the risk of investments and tank the stock market. Future Changing the definition of income to future income which fuck everyone up the ass.
This post has been edited by EsotericSatire: Apr 6 2022, 12:23
Tax experts claim that Brandon's tax legislation is insidious because it redefines income tax for everyone and that will massively increase the risk of investments and tank the stock market. Future Changing the definition of income to future income which fuck everyone up the ass.
I don't even need a tax advisor to tell me that this tax change MOCKS (thru unintended consequence) the democrat party's famous statement of "Diversity Is Strength". One of this aphorism's justifications is based upon a a rule of thumb for "hands off" types of stock market investing where such investors diversify their portfolio to reduce risk. Frequent investors and daily traders don't necessarily follow such a blind tactic though. It's quite ironic that this democrat motto for socialism is actually based upon twisting of a capitalism principle.
But this proposed tax plan makes a double irony. Do you see it?
Unless there are some exemptions in that tax plan, it hugely reduces investment diversity for "hands off" investors. Still don't see it? Okay, remember your 401K managed portfolio. Are you hands-on or hands-off? I bet most employees putting money into their 401K are hands-off (they don't manipulate holdings once everr week) and thus use the diversity is strength approach to reduce risk. Such investors may only look at their investment percentages once a year or once per quarter only because their company has directed the 401K manager to communicate to the employees that it is time to re-balance their major category options in their 401K fund. Many people see a minimum of five different category options to pick from such as: Long term, Short term, Long term with earnings, money market, bonds, your company's stock, etc. This tax plan causes instruments to lose many types of long term investment profitability in various markets. Thus, the ability to have diversity is reduced.
Let's Go, Brandon!, CLAP CLAP CLAP-CLAP-CLAP
Apr 3 2022, 14:10
