Nah Joe Biden is too scrambled eggs to be the manchurian candidate. His administration is corrupt enough though to take money, and he did take bribes from China but the key point is that he is senile and forgot.
That is why they were screaming 'we own you' at the first meeting.
Biden: C'mon man, I never took money.
After then giving hundreds of thousands by buying Hunter's art works
Xi: Okay, can you say Taiwan is not a country
Biden: Okay got it, Taiwan, you know the thing, is a country.
They said if Trump goes to jail then all his secret service will have to go to jail, too. (IMG:[invalid] style_emoticons/default/laugh.gif)
Plot twist: He can still be elected president if incarcerated. Until then, he's going to play Madison Square Garden.
Its more like they want to drain his campaign funds, and ability to travel whilst also creating an narrative to explain how Biden won in another land slide (using all the illegals they are registering to vote in swing states).
There have been something like 2m sketchy registrations with social security numbers only that Texas and another state can not explain. The system is preventing dead people from registering... but someone is applying for them...
If Texas swings blue, then it undoes all the gains that Trump has made.
Brandon: I am going to station 1000 US troops right next to HAMAS controlled territory and put up a big ass target. Hopefully they don't fire at us and force a US invasion that will cost billions.
Donald Trump cont [BLAH BLAH BLAH] Trump’s support in the poll among registered voters holds steady at 49% in a head-to-head matchup against Biden, the same as in CNN’s last national poll on the race in January, while Biden’s stands at 43%, not significantly different from January’s 45%.
Looking back, 55% of all Americans now say they see Trump’s presidency as a success, while 44% see it as a failure. In a January 2021 poll taken just before Trump left office and days after the January 6 attack on the US Capitol, 55% considered his time as president a failure.
Assessing Biden’s time in office so far, 61% say his presidency thus far has been a failure, while 39% say it’s been a success. That’s narrowly worse than the 57% who called the first year of his administration a failure in January 2022, with 41% calling it a success.
?????????????? Where are these numbers coming from? I do not know a SINGLE person, online or IRL, who says Biden is good. NOT A SINGLE ONE. I don't even think anyone on this subforum would say Biden's presidency was a success. Do you guys know Biden fans???
Everyone hates that guy. Even the idiots who hate each other.
Biden will lose all of his billionaire backers if he accidentally creates an occupy 2.0 movement. The purpose of giving all the crazy radicals a microphone was to divide people so that they did not try to hold the bankers and government accountable for spending.
While terrorists are rioting in the USA and the world is on the brink of nuclear war, potato brains handed out the Presidential Medal of Freedom to all his ancient woke friends and activists.
This video actually had the comments section open.
QUOTE
His group of handlers..
QUOTE
Another award like the Nobel Peace Prize and the Pulitzer you can now wipe your derriere with! Pelosi AlGore Clyburn Kerry LOL!
QUOTE
He called it the freedom of medal.
He really did call it the Freedom of Medal, I saw it on Fox News. At first I couldn't believe it but then thought well of course you can, that's how things are now.
This post has been edited by Honeycat: May 4 2024, 04:13
The black retarded mayor of NYC said migrants are excellent swimmers and they need lifeguards. When I saw the clip of him saying that, I literally started laughing because he's so fucking stupid. It takes a lot of training to be a lifeguard and illegals don't swim, they wade waist deep across dirty rivers.
Trump's been challenging Biden to debate all year, he says it during his rallies. Now the woke news is saying Trump accepted Biden's debate challenge like it was Potato Joe's idea. And two tards from CNN are going to moderate it. Yeah, that'll be fair. They'll inject some of Hunter's tweak into Biden and put an earpiece in his ear to feed him the answers like last time. More cocaine was found in the Capitol Police Headquarters so Hunter must be making some cheddar being the drug dealer of DC.
This post has been edited by Honeycat: May 17 2024, 04:41
NIH had to finally admit that they funded the covid19 gain of function research in Wuhan and that it was not regulated because they classified it as low risk.
The research was banned in the US because it was high risk.
Woa, we thought Scotland's hate speech laws were bad. Canada has gone full 1984, where you can be fined 20k in damages to anyone that took offense at anything you have previously done or said.
They also plan to farm social media and use the data to prosecute people for pre-crime and put people under house arrest if the lefty research groups predict that you will commit a hate crime in the future.
Misgendering is a hate crime.
If a pedo waves their female penis around in a change room in front of underage girls, the girls will all be fined 20k for complaining and marked as potential pre-criminals for life.
Justice officials, who spoke to journalists on the condition they not be named, underscored that a high threshold would need to be met for a court to convict someone of advocating genocide.
Not only does a provincial attorney general have to sign off on such a charge, but a judge would need to be satisfied that an individual "is directly seeking others to prompt or provoke others to commit genocide."
QUOTE
A chant heard at some protests since the war -- "From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free" -- has been at the centre of the debate over where the line is when it comes to hate speech.
Some Jewish groups have said it calls for the destruction of Israel, which lies between the Jordan River and the Mediterranean Sea, and should therefore be considered hate speech or advocating genocide.
QUOTE
Last fall, a man whose lawyer said he had chanted the phrase was charged in Calgary with causing a disturbance with a hate motivation. The charge was eventually stayed.
Deliberate misgendering in the workplace is a human rights violation, according to a ruling from a Canadian court.
Last Wednesday, the British Columbia Human Rights Tribunal ruled in favor of Jessie Nelson, a restaurant worker who filed a complaint against their former employer, Buono Osteria. Nelson, who is nonbinary and genderfluid, claimed the British Columbia Italian restaurant discriminated against them by intentionally using incorrect pronouns. They alleged that their former employers deliberately referred to them using gendered nicknames such as “sweetheart,” “sweetie,” and “honey.”
In a 42-page ruling, Tribunal representative Devyn Cousineau found that the restaurant’s alleged misconduct violated British Columbia’s Human Rights Act. She went on to write that pronouns are “a fundamental part of a person’s identity” and that their proper usage indicates “that we see and respect a person for who they are.”
“Especially for trans, non-binary, or other non-cisgender people, using the correct pronouns validates and affirms they are a person equally deserving of respect and dignity,” Cousineau wrote in the decision. “When people use the right pronouns, they can feel safe and enjoy the moment. When people do not use the right pronouns, that safety is undermined and they are forced to repeat to the world: I exist.”
QUOTE
Nelson’s attorney, Adrienne Smith, celebrated the decision after the ruling was handed down last week. They said the decision showed that “the correct pronouns for transgender people are not optional.”
“They’re the minimum of courtesy and respect,” Smith said to Canadian news outlet CityNews. “It’s not an option to respect the pronouns that trans people choose for themselves. It’s a legal requirement to use the pronouns that a trans person uses for themselves and asks to have used in the workplace.”
The Canadian Human Rights Act does not mention pronouns either. The act protects certain groups from discrimination.
“Would it cover the accidental misuse of a pronoun? I would say it’s very unlikely,” Cossman says. “Would it cover a situation where an individual repeatedly, consistently refuses to use a person’s chosen pronoun? It might.”
If someone refused to use a preferred pronoun — and it was determined to constitute discrimination or harassment — could that potentially result in jail time?
It is possible, Brown says, through a process that would start with a complaint and progress to a proceeding before a human rights tribunal. If the tribunal rules that harassment or discrimination took place, there would typically be an order for monetary and non-monetary remedies. A non-monetary remedy may include sensitivity training, issuing an apology, or even a publication ban, he says.
Wouldn't that just fall under something like harassment
Let's Go, Brandon!, CLAP CLAP CLAP-CLAP-CLAP
Apr 25 2024, 12:09
