Loading. Please Wait... 
 |
 |
 |
Asked the Experts, For archive purposes only. Please use Ask the Expert! for questions |
|
Jan 20 2016, 03:22
|
sssss2
Group: Gold Star Club
Posts: 4,017
Joined: 11-April 14

|
QUOTE(mozilla browser @ Jan 20 2016, 01:05)  But, both the quality formula and IW round formula are approximations. I checked what this formula predicts and the actual number of rounds for some itmes I had, and...
pxp0,formula iw rounds,actual iw rounds 371, 95.5320528, 95 372, 96.5935104, 97 373, 97.6628016, 97 374, 98.7399552, 99 375, 99.8250000, 99 376, 100.9179648, 100
QUOTE(mozilla browser @ Jan 20 2016, 08:55)  The numbers were truncated for display, but the numbers used in calculation had as much precision as google sheets does.
Anyway if we're happy with approximating, why not just use something like pxp0-276? Moreover, current thinking is that hallowed/demonic > ethereal.
The formular is correct. But pxp0 on the equip link is a truncated thing, which makes the error while calculating. CODE REAL PXP0 | PXP0 | f(pxp0) | ROUNDS ----------------------------------- 373.7 | 374 | 98.416 | 98 373.9 | 374 | 98.632 | 99 374.1 | 375 | 98.848 | 99
This post has been edited by sssss2: Jan 20 2016, 04:42
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Jan 20 2016, 04:28
|
mozilla browser
Group: Gold Star Club
Posts: 2,131
Joined: 22-December 11

|
QUOTE(sssss2 @ Jan 20 2016, 09:22)  The formular is correct. But pxp0 on the equip link is truncated thing, which makes the error while calculating. CODE REAL PXP0 | PXP0 | f(pxp0) | ROUNDS ----------------------------------- 373.7 | 374 | 98.416 | 98 373.9 | 374 | 98.632 | 99 374.1 | 375 | 98.848 | 99
Ah! But how do we get the real pxp0?
|
|
|
Jan 20 2016, 05:37
|
arialinnoc
Group: Gold Star Club
Posts: 7,704
Joined: 6-April 10

|
A non hv relate but I'd like to ask about pm message. I got a forward pm. I opened it and saw it empty. But when I clicked to reply it popped-out the content. Why?
|
|
|
Jan 20 2016, 05:47
|
Superlatanium
Group: Gold Star Club
Posts: 7,631
Joined: 27-November 13

|
QUOTE(arialinnoc @ Jan 20 2016, 03:37)  A non hv relate but I'd like to ask about pm message. I got a forward pm. I opened it and saw it empty. But when I clicked to reply it popped-out the content. Why? 1. Was the message color-styled? One particular color will make text invisible on the same colored background. Also try highlighting the message on the message page, see if the text gets highlighted. 2. On the message page, look at the page source, and look at the content betwween <div class="postcolor"></div>. Is there anything there?
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Jan 20 2016, 06:00
|
arialinnoc
Group: Gold Star Club
Posts: 7,704
Joined: 6-April 10

|
QUOTE(Superlatanium @ Jan 20 2016, 10:47)  1. Was the message color-styled? One particular color will make text invisible on the same colored background. Also try highlighting the message on the message page, see if the text gets highlighted. 2. On the message page, look at the page source, and look at the content betwween <div class="postcolor"></div>. Is there anything there?
It's not color. It's show nothing. But when it show on a reply it seems not a completed contents. It has "<!--IBF.ATTACHMENT_605131-->" between <div class="postcolor"></div>. This post has been edited by arialinnoc: Jan 20 2016, 06:02
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Jan 20 2016, 06:07
|
Superlatanium
Group: Gold Star Club
Posts: 7,631
Joined: 27-November 13

|
QUOTE(arialinnoc @ Jan 20 2016, 04:00)  It's not color. It's show nothing. But when it show on a reply it seems not a completed contents.
It has "<!--IBF.ATTACHMENT_605131-->" between <div class="postcolor"></div>. Yet when you replied, there was content? Must just be a forum bug then, there are a few of those around.
|
|
|
Jan 20 2016, 06:08
|
arialinnoc
Group: Gold Star Club
Posts: 7,704
Joined: 6-April 10

|
QUOTE(Superlatanium @ Jan 20 2016, 11:07)  Yet when you replied, there was content? Must just be a forum bug then, there are a few of those around.
Ok, I see. Thank you (IMG:[ invalid] style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)
|
|
|
Jan 20 2016, 10:46
|
Sapo84
Group: Gold Star Club
Posts: 3,332
Joined: 14-June 09

|
QUOTE(mozilla browser @ Jan 20 2016, 02:17)  - burden can be feathered at negligible cost
For melee there is also 0 reason to decrease burden below 70 (and with Leg equipment burden will be always below 70). You only gain a defensive bonus, which you don't really need for 1H.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Jan 20 2016, 12:10
|
Cleavs
Group: Gold Star Club
Posts: 24,313
Joined: 18-January 07

|
QUOTE(mozilla browser @ Jan 20 2016, 03:28)  Ah! But how do we get the real pxp0?
yep. making such table would only take a couple of minutes. but it'd be pointless if there are even decimal values around. unless you clearly state on the table with truncated values "± 1 level due to aproximation" people who have to start an IW only want to have a hint about time, so i guess they may be satisfied enough anyways... QUOTE(arialinnoc @ Jan 20 2016, 04:37)  A non hv relate but I'd like to ask about pm message. I got a forward pm. I opened it and saw it empty. But when I clicked to reply it popped-out the content. Why?
probably the attachment doesn't exist or for any reason it cannot be displayed, thus leaving a blank space. take a look at this: you won't see anything, even though i wrote: CODE [url=http://hentaiverse.org/pages/showequip.php?eid=83221246&key=ab25878456] [/url] the code you reported is HTML, so it may behave a little different than BBCode (such as not even displaying the broken attachment warning). i may be wrong though (IMG:[ invalid] style_emoticons/default/heh.gif)
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Jan 20 2016, 12:18
|
Superlatanium
Group: Gold Star Club
Posts: 7,631
Joined: 27-November 13

|
QUOTE(Scremaz @ Jan 20 2016, 10:10)  probably the attachment doesn't exist or for any reason it cannot be displayed, thus leaving a blank space. take a look at this: you won't see anything, even though i wrote: CODE [url=http://hentaiverse.org/pages/showequip.php?eid=83221246&key=ab25878456] [/url] the code you reported is HTML, so it may behave a little different than BBCode (such as not even displaying the broken attachment warning). i may be wrong though (IMG:[ invalid] style_emoticons/default/heh.gif) That <!--IBF.ATTACHMENT_605131--> sort of thing is included in all messages in between those divs, whether there's an actual attachment or not. No idea what it is. Actually, I don't think attachments even work in PMs at all. Typing CODE [attachmentid=76001] just results in the text CODE [attachmentid=76001] after you send it. This post has been edited by Superlatanium: Jan 20 2016, 12:19
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Jan 20 2016, 12:31
|
Cleavs
Group: Gold Star Club
Posts: 24,313
Joined: 18-January 07

|
QUOTE(Superlatanium @ Jan 20 2016, 11:18)  That <!--IBF.ATTACHMENT_605131--> sort of thing is included in all messages in between those divs, whether there's an actual attachment or not. No idea what it is.
no clue then. maybe only a header and that 605131 is a forum own element? (IMG:[ invalid] style_emoticons/default/heh.gif) QUOTE(Superlatanium @ Jan 20 2016, 11:18)  Actually, I don't think attachments even work in PMs at all. Typing CODE [attachmentid=76001] just results in the text CODE [attachmentid=76001] after you send it. nope. once i was able to make them work. something like first posting it in a post, then embedding in a PM. too lazy to try now, but it definitely worked. it was a couple of patches ago though, maybe now it's not possible anymore... (IMG:[ invalid] style_emoticons/default/unsure.gif)
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Jan 20 2016, 17:16
|
nec1986
Group: Gold Star Club
Posts: 2,569
Joined: 12-October 14

|
I dont know. How animation like this (same in asagi which is made almost 10 years ago) [ 113.imagebam.com] http://113.imagebam.com/download/j0mo5jq77...334457/old1.gifcould turn into this? [ 113.imagebam.com] http://113.imagebam.com/download/r42MN30ui...334525/new2.gifIts completely different. Look how careful was made first one. High dynamic. We can see movement in everything. Hair, head, breast, belly, legs, shading and so on. And look at second, its completely different. Looks like plastic figure from image was simple mouseshifted for changes. Sure its probably 3d model, but look at antigravity hair or completely same texture. Its full potboiler.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Jan 20 2016, 17:42
|
Void Domain
Group: Catgirl Camarilla
Posts: 2,131
Joined: 30-May 10

|
QUOTE(nec1986 @ Jan 20 2016, 23:16)  I dont know. How animation like this (same in asagi which is made almost 10 years ago) [ 113.imagebam.com] http://113.imagebam.com/download/j0mo5jq77...334457/old1.gifcould turn into this? [ 113.imagebam.com] http://113.imagebam.com/download/r42MN30ui...334525/new2.gifIts completely different. Look how careful was made first one. High dynamic. We can see movement in everything. Hair, head, breast, belly, legs, shading and so on. And look at second, its completely different. Looks like plastic figure from image was simple mouseshifted for changes. Sure its probably 3d model, but look at antigravity hair or completely same texture. Its full potboiler. Because no one is buying them anymore? I think the market shifted to stuff like to love or valkyrie drive from last season.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Jan 20 2016, 18:46
|
nec1986
Group: Gold Star Club
Posts: 2,569
Joined: 12-October 14

|
Maybe, its probably not so easy to make even one episode. I mean gigants like pixar has probably more than 1000 people and still its only 1-2 films/year.
|
|
|
Jan 20 2016, 18:52
|
nobody_xxx
Group: Gold Star Club
Posts: 13,753
Joined: 7-December 10

|
QUOTE(nec1986 @ Jan 20 2016, 23:46)  Maybe, its probably not so easy to make even one episode. I mean gigants like pixar has probably more than 1000 people and still its only 1-2 films/year.
talking about animated movie , kungfu panda 3 is coming (IMG:[ invalid] style_emoticons/default/happy.gif)
|
|
|
Jan 20 2016, 19:06
|
nec1986
Group: Gold Star Club
Posts: 2,569
Joined: 12-October 14

|
Yep, next week. Should be fun.
|
|
|
Jan 20 2016, 19:58
|
nec1986
Group: Gold Star Club
Posts: 2,569
Joined: 12-October 14

|
I liked home and inside out. Havent seen hotel transylvania.
|
|
|
Jan 20 2016, 20:39
|
nobody_xxx
Group: Gold Star Club
Posts: 13,753
Joined: 7-December 10

|
QUOTE(nec1986 @ Jan 21 2016, 00:58)  I liked home and inside out. Havent seen hotel transylvania.
hotel trans 2 is good , if you like the first one than you will like hotel trans 2 too (IMG:[ invalid] style_emoticons/default/laugh.gif) btw , the penguins of madagascar is one of my fav (IMG:[ invalid] style_emoticons/default/happy.gif)
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Jan 20 2016, 20:56
|
Fudo Masamune
Group: Gold Star Club
Posts: 1,636
Joined: 2-February 10

|
QUOTE(nec1986 @ Jan 20 2016, 22:16)  I dont know. How animation like this (same in asagi which is made almost 10 years ago) [ 113.imagebam.com] http://113.imagebam.com/download/j0mo5jq77...334457/old1.gifcould turn into this? [ 113.imagebam.com] http://113.imagebam.com/download/r42MN30ui...334525/new2.gifIts completely different. Look how careful was made first one. High dynamic. We can see movement in everything. Hair, head, breast, belly, legs, shading and so on. And look at second, its completely different. Looks like plastic figure from image was simple mouseshifted for changes. Sure its probably 3d model, but look at antigravity hair or completely same texture. Its full potboiler. We have to admit, people who work on animation are mostly fans turned "professional", and if you move from being fans to a pro, many couldn't cope with the burden of professional business expectation ... and boy there's lots of them that ended up doing their job halfheartedly in the end. Moreover, those who works for hentai stuff are mostly those who didn't get accepted to work for big studio, and even the standard for those who are working for big studio are failing, look at digimon tri for example, sure at the first look it's more fancy and crispy compared to the first season, but it's mostly due to advancement in technology, nuance wise, the first digimon is better than digimon tri. Back to hentai... I sometimes still prefer Bible black over many new titles, and bible black is like what... 10 years ago? QUOTE(nec1986 @ Jan 21 2016, 00:58)  I liked home and inside out. Havent seen hotel transylvania.
the first hotel transylvania is better than the 2nd. inside out is better than the good dinosaur, in case you're wondering.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
|
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|