[X] My Assistant

void strike (and more in general, void damage) is the only type which don't have specifical mitigation, neither for player nor for mobs. void strikes can still be evaded/parried/resisted though

Thats not correct, there is a specific mitigation for void. But atm there is nothing that gives you void mitigation.

Thats not correct, there is a specific mitigation for void. But atm there is nothing that gives you void mitigation.

really? (IMG:[invalid] style_emoticons/default/blink.gif)

so 40% piering & 0% void
which is better (IMG:[invalid] style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)

I think yes.
I'm investing in Storm Spike Shield as well. My weapon hv elect bonus, and this spike shield give status effect that reduce monster resistance for elect.
I don't pay attension to how much effective it realy is. Someone please tell me if I'm right or misunderstand this. Thanks

Oh, okay.
Then I'll take it as soon as my ethereal mace reaches level 10 and gets an Elemental Strike (IMG:[invalid] style_emoticons/default/tongue.gif)

really? (IMG:[invalid] style_emoticons/default/blink.gif)

http://ehwiki.org/wiki/void#Void

no

A long time ago the 'Hulk' suffix (retired suffix) did give void mitigation, but then it seems the mitigation's removed.

A long time ago the 'Hulk' suffix (retired suffix) did give void mitigation, but then it seems the mitigation's removed.

while we are at it, what did other old suffixes like 'of the shielding aura' do?

while we are at it, what did other old suffixes like 'of the shielding aura' do?

It gives soul mitigation IIRC.

It gives soul mitigation IIRC.

that should have been another damage type, now has been converted into void, right?

This post has been edited by Scremaz: Apr 6 2014, 22:41

http://ehwiki.org/wiki/void#Void

no

Then please explain me, what it this that in the mitigation list under slashing, a hallucination?

Then please explain me, what it this that in the mitigation list under slashing, a hallucination?

if you mean this it's indeed void mitigation, but it's also clearly written that

Players and monsters have 0% specific mitigation against void attacks.

this mean that it can surely be mitigated, but only by chance and you can't do absolutely nothing about it (go into your character first page and see what value you have at 'void mitigation'). it's been inserted only to fulfill the possible cases.

This post has been edited by Scremaz: Apr 6 2014, 22:47

if you mean this it's indeed void mitigation, but it's also clearly written that [indent][/indent]

And what if i mean this?

And what if i mean this?

that's just what i meant, you're confirming what i wrote, except that i edited my post too late (IMG:[invalid] style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif)
as far as i know, nobody has something different from 0. it could be either tenboro has some kind of humour or he loes symmetry

This post has been edited by Scremaz: Apr 6 2014, 22:51

as far as i know, nobody has something different from 0. it could be either tenboro has some kind of humour or he loes symmetry

atm there is nothing that gives you void mitigation.

we're saying the same thing, but you also wrote:

Thats not correct, there is a specific mitigation for void.

we're saying the same thing, but you also wrote:

Yes, i did. And there it is. Otherwise i wouldnt be in the charakter screen.

It doesn't matter that it's visible. It matters that you can't do anything about it.

It doesn't matter that it's visible. It matters that you can't do anything about it.

The same doesnt bother people who looking to the moon. You cant do anything with it. But its there. Sit just there and look nice. (IMG:[invalid] style_emoticons/default/wub.gif)

The same doesnt bother people who looking to the moon. You cant do anything with it. But its there. Sit just there and look nice. (IMG:[invalid] style_emoticons/default/wub.gif)

or scarlett johansson (IMG:[invalid] style_emoticons/default/wub.gif) (IMG:[invalid] style_emoticons/default/wub.gif)

(IMG:[2.bp.blogspot.com] http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-D1sfigezYV4/UPqJyD914qI/AAAAAAAAB9M/vDO4h2-HY0Y/s1600/scarlet%20zjkIq.gif) (IMG:[2.bp.blogspot.com] http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-HDFVCA3fiQ0/UPqJysXcCEI/AAAAAAAAB9Q/6u-T2QDq1j0/s1600/scarlett-johansson-boobs-09.gif)

imo the reason is just it's a series of fields divided into two rows, and tenboro didn't want to leave a blank one. in other words, just formatting matter...

[attachembed=40004]

This post has been edited by Scremaz: Apr 6 2014, 23:13

or scarlett johansson (IMG:[invalid] style_emoticons/default/wub.gif) (IMG:[invalid] style_emoticons/default/wub.gif)

Oh, i could do a lot of things to her, with her, upon her, behind her, inside her, among her. Oh, my mind races.

imo the reason is just it's a series of fields divided into two rows, and tenboro didn't want to leave a blank one. in other words, just formatting matter...

Husch my beloved void mitigation, dont listen to the bad people. You and me. Time and Schoolgirls. (IMG:[invalid] style_emoticons/default/tongue.gif)