[X] My Assistant

i had 1st lvl forge, now im 0lvl (IMG:[invalid] style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif)
and 250 to lvlup is insane for me... i guess i should forget about forging (IMG:[invalid] style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)

This post has been edited by FLCLocust: Sep 2 2012, 16:55

So since forging requirements are increased tenfold can we get the exp put onto equipments increased by tenfold, so that they both still match?

So since forging requirements are increased tenfold can we get the exp put onto equipments increased by tenfold, so that they both still match?

They are. Read the patch notes.

I think my forge level actually went up after this, pretty sure it was at 7 earlier today and it's 9 now..
Couldn't check earlier because I was in a crysfest. Anyway, thanks.

This post has been edited by chivoef: Sep 2 2012, 18:14

So since forging requirements are increased tenfold can we get the exp put onto equipments increased by tenfold, so that they both still match?

hrmmmmmmmm

no

They are. Read the patch notes.

Nope. Still 5 item EXP per mid grade x 5.

This post has been edited by Bunker Buster: Sep 2 2012, 18:18

hrmmmmmmmm

no
Nope. Still 5 item EXP per mid grade x 5.

Here's proof:

my forge is at 120/1250
my item upgrade displays 8 exp gain
*upgrade*
forge exp: 200/1250

it's a display bug.

Look at the item exp, not the forge exp.


Tenboro can we have the new charts on quality to salvage ratios please

are legendaries still at 75%?

This post has been edited by Bunker Buster: Sep 2 2012, 18:30

Look at the item exp, not the forge exp.
Tenboro can we have the new charts on quality to salvage ratios please

are legendaries still at 75%?

Ah my bad. You were talking about the potency exp.
Why should he change this though? It makes no sense. Since technically nothing that would affect it changed..

Ah my bad. You were talking about the potency exp.
Why should he change this though? It makes no sense. Since technically nothing that would affect it changed..

I don't think it should be changed either due to markets of necessity

lv4 revert to lv1, ain't gonna miss it since none of my equip even touching half way of the upgrade (IMG:[invalid] style_emoticons/default/tongue.gif)

Unfortunate though it may be for those few who didn't try to cheat the system.

Tenboro like; player hate = "working as intended"
Tenboro hate; player like = "bug/exploit"

I called it "working as intended" since it still cost me tons of credits and materials.

Tenboro like; player hate = "working as intended"
Tenboro hate; player like = "bug/exploit"

I called it "working as intended" since it still cost me tons of credits and materials.

Why didn't I ban your ass yet?

*munches on corn nuts*

Still have no Idea what bug this was.

Apparently you got a binding back if you put at least one binding in the equipment.

Oh, so Hito is one of them. Well, that's boring ...

(IMG:[img.photobucket.com] http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v725/feadraug/geese_predictabo.gif)

Oh, so Hito is one of them. Well, that's boring ...

(IMG:[img.photobucket.com] http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v725/feadraug/geese_predictabo.gif)

If only he dumped 10 resist bindings and ~40-50 low grades at a time on a single piece of gear then salvaged it like everyone else (me)

Still have no Idea what bug this was.

Get a crude item upgrade everything that requires 5 low grade and a binding then salvage it and get back all your bindings rinse and repeat. It has been corrected for everyone wanting to try.

Tenboro like; player hate = "working as intended"
Tenboro hate; player like = "bug/exploit"

I called it "working as intended" since it still cost me tons of credits and materials.

- Salvaging an item with upgrades will also return some of the bindings used. The amount returned depends on the quality of the item, with low-quality items giving back as little as 25% while the highest-quality legendaries (>=1 quality) salvages as much as 75%.

Seriously how did you not see that coming?

Why didn't I ban your ass yet?

Because I don't cross the line? Just stomp all over it sometimes.

Perhaps you should employ beta testers for patches so things like this don't happen are less likely to happen.