QUOTE(varst @ Jun 30 2012, 19:11)

1. Well you've said the main point: if lots of people want an item and even willing to pay more than the minimum price, why shouldn't the bazaar (and the sellers now) take this opportunity? Moogles are not charity (though they're now charitable enough to give some of the profits back).
And economists will tell you that 'bidding' is more efficient in resource allocation than 'first come first serve'.
What economists would say means squat, really. After dozen of years hearing stuff like "free markets regulate themselves" and after several economic crises (from the argentinian bonds to the recent subprime mortgages implosion) no one in his right mind should try to back up his words with this kind of nonsense. Next time think twice about it. And then decide against it anyway.
QUOTE(varst @ Jun 30 2012, 19:11)

So it's the fair solution; either you pay more, or you buy less.
Just to be absolutely clear: when you're faced with two options that yeld the same result, you don't have a choice at all. That's anything but fair.
QUOTE(varst @ Jun 30 2012, 19:11)

2. What's the problem of 30 bots then? If you place your own bid, that will never be a problem for you. If they don't have fund, you can still get what you want. Or you mean you can't see the correct bid? Then maybe Tenb should add 'the last successful bid'.
The problem is uncontrolled inflation. Not sure what "economists" would say, but that hardly looks like a good thing.
QUOTE(varst @ Jun 30 2012, 19:11)

3. Yes that's a issue. You can't expect everyone to read the forum.
(In fact, I'm not sure how many of them are reading the forum...)
I couldn't care less how many of them are reading the forum or not. Anyone with half a brain can figure out that the price you input is "per item". Actually, 1/4th of a brain should suffice: the original per-item price is listed a few pixels away.