[X] My Assistant

Except if your browser decides to throw endless loads (IMG:[invalid] style_emoticons/default/happy.gif)

I should have read more carefully (IMG:[invalid] style_emoticons/default/dry.gif)
FF did throw endless loads...

HV_SmartMonsterLab

This looks nice and very easy to use (o_o)b

And it is only for me, or tr/sec has a increased a little with this compact script?

I would like to know about that too.
I made this css in hope to achieve that but my internet is suffering from chronical slowness. I can't see the difference for myself (IMG:[invalid] style_emoticons/default/sleep.gif)

I would like to know about that too.

So, lets do my favorite thing - test some scripts! ^^
My opinion after a little testing marathon is... your script DO increase turn/sec a little, and can be using in increasing speed.

So, how it was?
I went onto bazarr and bought some random crude staff.
[s019.radikal.ru] (IMG:[s019.radikal.ru] http://s019.radikal.ru/i612/1602/41/8d95f6e4f7a0t.jpg)
Then I entered Item World.

I did SIX runs. Three without your battle Compact script and three with it.
Conditions in every runs was like this:
- Using only melee (no spells or skills allowed, even support one)
- Items have been not used
- Using numpad to hit enemies
- Spirit not allowed
- All scripts, except see below, were deactivated
- Using only HV Counter Save (to check my speed at the end of the battle) and HV Stat Slim (to auto skip "victory-popup")
- If RiddleMaster happens - do another run (I spend sometimes a 30 sec to answer this popup due my bad eyes and monitor >_>)
- In every run I have 10 rounds

Now...
Result for three runs without your script like this:
[s018.radikal.ru] (IMG:[s018.radikal.ru] http://s018.radikal.ru/i521/1602/87/c55c3cfcb065t.jpg)

Result for three runs with your script like this:
[s017.radikal.ru] (IMG:[s017.radikal.ru] http://s017.radikal.ru/i404/1602/f1/87b5533af7bdt.jpg)

Let's do a little math:
Without your script: 0,877 / 0.910 / 0.911 | Average: 0.899
With your script: 1,103 / 1.061 / 0.978 | Average: 1.047

I think this results are self-explanatory ^^

So for now I WILL use your script for speed up my battle.

P.S. Of course, there some side-factors like latency, user-side problem, some browser-weirdness, e.t.c. so, my test maybe absolutely wrong...

- snip -

P.S. Of course, there some side-factors like latency, user-side problem, some browser-weirdness, e.t.c. so, my test maybe absolutely wrong...

That's still good to know, thanks (IMG:[invalid] style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)
It may also be faster without the battle log...

It may also be faster without the battle log...

Yeah, but now when I think about it - I dont remember any script that nullified battle log...
The only script with same feature is realoder. In latest version there setting to disable battlelog.
But, once again, I dont remember dedicated script to disable battlelog.

Yeah, but now when I think about it - I dont remember any script that nullified battle log...
The only script with same feature is realoder. In latest version there setting to disable battlelog.
But, once again, I dont remember dedicated script to disable battlelog.

I can do that for you with 1 line of css:

CODE

#togpane_log{display:none !important;}

I didn't include this in battle compact since I like to see what I drop in battle ^^

I can do that for you with 1 line of css:

But... but... ohh... yeah... This is very easy solution. I am little surprised. I though about nullifying every line of log, but "hide the whole div" is way better solution. ^^

But do I understand right, that log still will be exist and technically would present onto battle screen, but just will be invisibly?

But... but... ohh... yeah... This is very easy solution. I am little surprised. I though about nullifying every line of log, but "hide the whole div" is way better solution. ^^

But do I understand right, that log still will be exist and technically would present onto battle screen, but just will be invisibly?

To my understanding:
- display:none erases the targetted div
- display:hidden just hides it


This post has been edited by boulay: Feb 4 2016, 21:56

- display:none erases the targetted div
- display:hidden just hides it

oh! That makes sense. Thanks for explanation ^^

To my understanding:
- display:none erases the targetted div
- display:hidden just hides it

Technically ... first of all there is no "display: hidden", i guess you meant "visibility: hidden" (IMG:[invalid] style_emoticons/default/happy.gif)
If it still works, it's probably so common an error, that browsers just translate it in some way or other.

Back to topic,
"display: none" prevents rendering the element at all
"visibility: hidden" renders the element but hides the content (you still get an empty box that takes up space)

Technically ... first of all there is no "display: hidden", i guess you meant "visibility: hidden" (IMG:[invalid] style_emoticons/default/happy.gif)
If it still works, it's probably so common an error, that browsers just translate it in some way or other.

Back to topic,
"display: none" prevents rendering the element at all
"visibility: hidden" renders the element but hides the content (you still get an empty box that takes up space)

Mmmh, yeah. I mixed up things (IMG:[invalid] style_emoticons/default/sleep.gif)

Firefox will run faster in hv without stylish, I can confirm that.

newbie here (IMG:[invalid] style_emoticons/default/smile.gif) , please tell me how to use css file on firefox without stylish addon, I will really appreciate it (IMG:[invalid] style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)

newbie here (IMG:[invalid] style_emoticons/default/smile.gif) , please tell me how to use css file on firefox without stylish addon, I will really appreciate it (IMG:[invalid] style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)

In a userscript, what I do is something like

CODE

    var cssSource = `

body {background:#DFEBED; font-family:arial;}
.thumbContainer {border:2px solid black; position:absolute;}
button {padding:0; margin-left:15px; margin-right:15px;}

    `;
    var cssStyle = document.head.appendChild(document.createElement('style'));
    cssSource.split('\n').forEach(function(rule){
      if (rule && rule.replace(/\s*/g, '').length)
        cssStyle.sheet.insertRule(rule, 0);
    });

(or just replace the cssSource text with the CSS you want to use)

Or is there a better way? I wouldn't know.

Edit: Well of course you could repeat many cssStyle.sheet.insertRule('body {background:#DFEBED; font-family:arial;}', 0); but that looks horrible if you have more than a few rules.

This post has been edited by Superlatanium: Feb 5 2016, 00:33

Thank you for using my script.

THATS BADASS MONSTER LAB! O_O
My monsterLab not so good, as your v_v
Works great! And I like that win-8 aestheticslim mode
You know what even can be better? Support of Drag'n'drop like in Mini MonsterLab Additions script? =)

D&D is good idea!
I have plans for the next update:

1. Check Box
2. Give Crystal
3. Manual Sort Mode (D&D)

And your Scripts Compendium is a very great work!
I'm rooting for you. (IMG:[invalid] style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)

In a userscript, what I do is something like

CODE

    var cssSource = `

body {background:#DFEBED; font-family:arial;}
.thumbContainer {border:2px solid black; position:absolute;}
button {padding:0; margin-left:15px; margin-right:15px;}

    `;
    var cssStyle = document.head.appendChild(document.createElement('style'));
    cssSource.split('\n').forEach(function(rule){
      if (rule && rule.replace(/\s*/g, '').length)
        cssStyle.sheet.insertRule(rule, 0);
    });

(or just replace the cssSource text with the CSS you want to use)

Or is there a better way? I wouldn't know.

Edit: Well of course you could repeat many cssStyle.sheet.insertRule('body {background:#DFEBED; font-family:arial;}', 0); but that looks horrible if you have more than a few rules.

Instead of

CODE

    cssSource.split('\n').forEach(function(rule){
      if (rule && rule.replace(/\s*/g, '').length)
        cssStyle.sheet.insertRule(rule, 0);
    });

Why don't you just use

CODE

cssStyle.innerHTML = cssSource;

Seems vastly easier than looping and regexing. At least if you have your style in one String.
Also probably faster than the regex replace and, note i haven't tested this, i would guess that each insertRule() may trigger a rerender of the page (IMG:[invalid] style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif)

In a userscript, what I do is something like
Or is there a better way? I wouldn't know.

cssStyle.innerHTML = cssSource;

Oh, I didn't know `(Template literal).
I use css in SmartMonsterLab like this:

CODE

var d = document;
var css = d.createElement("style");
css.textContent = ["#cfg_back_sml {",
   "position: fixed;",
   "width: 100%;",
   "height: 100%;",
"}"].join("");

I think textContent is faster then innerHTML.
node.property = hoge; ... appendChild(node);
is faster then
appendChild(node); ... node.property = hoge;

And if you use "@run-at document-start" in Chrome/Iron, "head" will return undefined. (IMG:[invalid] style_emoticons/default/sad.gif)

CODE

if (d.head) d.head.appendChild(css);
else d.lastChild.appendChild(css);

I use this way. (IMG:[invalid] style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)

This post has been edited by tatarime: Feb 5 2016, 01:20

Oh, I didn't know `(Template literal).

`` allows multi line strings. It also allows inserting variables in it with ${var}, e.g.:

CODE

foo = 'bar';
baz = `${foo} bar`; // "bar bar"

Why not useGM_addStyle?

CODE

// @grant GM_addStyle
var css = `
    some { th: ing; }
`;

GM_addStyle(css);

Why not useGM_addStyle?

CODE

// @grant GM_addStyle
var css = `
    some { th: ing; }
`;

GM_addStyle(css);

a ) using GreaseMonkey requires GreaseMonkey
b ) GM_addStyle resolves to

CODE

function GM_addStyle(doc, css) {
  var head = doc.getElementsByTagName("head")[0];
  if (head) {
    var style = doc.createElement("style");
    style.textContent = css;
    style.type = "text/css";
    head.appendChild(style);
    return style;
  }
  return null;
}

GM_addStyle works in Tampermonkey.
If you're not using that or greasemonkey, I don't know what you're using unsigned chrome extension?

This post has been edited by FabulousCupcake: Feb 5 2016, 03:08

`` allows multi line strings. It also allows inserting variables in it with ${var}, e.g.:
Why not useGM_addStyle?

Thank you!
I don't like GM function...
Previously, GM_setValue troubled me in Chrome (now I use localStorage).
But I know that GM_addStyle works in unsigned Chrome extension. (IMG:[invalid] style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)

GM_addStyle works in Tampermonkey.
If you're not using that or greasemonkey, I don't know what you're using unsigned chrome extension?

Not even that, you can just directly drag 'n' drop user scripts into chrome if they're written correctly (IMG:[invalid] style_emoticons/default/happy.gif)
That saves you from running around with an additional 400K of script from GM/TM.
Granted, since middle of last year there was a patch that deletes all extensions not from chrome store, but HV actually runs better on old versions anyway, at least in regards to eye cancer through flickering.