[X] My Assistant

Hardware isn't very impressive there's no good games to play it with. My PS3 is proof of that.

Commie.

Yeah, my shitty Xbawks has nothing on your Paperweightation 3. That's why I played through Skyrim with little to no issues.

ZING!

Yeah, my shitty Xbawks has nothing on your Paperweightation 3. That's why I played through Skyrim with little to no issues.

Yes, that's totally the PS3's fault and not a shitty developer. Nice try though.

The hardware is definitely different, so if a game is originally made for one system, a port to the other takes a lot of work and likely won't be as tight. Depends on the devs, though.

I'm rather annoyed that it's 2012 and we still don't have an industry standard for operating systems. I guess that's laziness and greed for you.

Yes, that's totally the PS3's fault and not a shitty developer. Nice try though.

Denial is the most delicious fruit.

Denial is the most delicious fruit.

And you certainly hate the truth because it goes against your hateful attitude toward so many things.

And you certainly hate the truth because it goes against your hateful attitude toward so many things.

Just you and the things you love :3

I guess this is why the PS3 has a higher percentage of games that rate well versus any console right now. [www.siliconera.com] http://www.siliconera.com/2009/03/19/criti...cclaimed-games/

PS3 is super serious.

I guess I always assumed it played, you know... video games.

The usual rad tactic at play I see. At least you're consistent.

I guess I don't see why it's such a sore topic, I guess. So what if the critics say whatever about anything? They're usually not speaking for me or anyone else except themselves so putting up "what critics think" as if it's proof of something significant is laughable. But I guess get apoplectic about a video game console if it makes you feels better, I just don't understand.

Simple, because you wanted to act as if I was in some sort of denial for the PS3 being shit all because Rob used the example of Skyrim as his basis of argument. Clearly the quality scores given to PS3 games prove that it's Bethesda being lazy fucks and does not reflect one bit on the quality of the console.

But that doesn't tell me why it matters so much to rile you up to frothing.

Again simple, because you clearly went out of your way to get a reaction. I gave you that reaction and now you start acting like it's my fault for saying anything. It's the rad tactic that's so often seen.

Not really. If you like it? Fine, go ahead and like it. But don't act like our comments are forcing you to not appreciate the things that you do. Usually it's all just bullshit on our part, unfortunately you'll probably just assume this is some sort of tactic or posturing or whatever, and that's alright, but it's not the truth.

I just don't understand.

1. Make a statement that clearly exists to incite a reaction
2. Wait for that person to react
3. Have a few exchanges with that person on the subject at hand
4. When either proven wrong, grow bored of the subject or feel that it's even remotely serious, claim you were playing around or tell that person they shouldn't care about said subject so much
5. Get defensive
6. Repeat

I never want a reaction from people I appreciate. Never really have. But you make it so fucking difficult for my appreciation to continue when you exaggerate some trivial event like this.

Stage 5

History repeats itself once again.

Seriously dude, we have such a long history of this exact sort of interaction that it's laughable.

This post has been edited by cptkleenex: Feb 28 2012, 08:00

I can't handle you anymore. I wash my hands of you.