It's a real shame Adobe seems so determined to milk Flash dry; they look to have transferred rights relating to it (or AIR, at least) to Harman (basically Samsung) so it won't become open-source and they can keep someone profiting off late transitioners.
I thought, since in the past they donated Flex to Apache (Flex is a bunch of tools to author SWF's without using Adobe Flash; works as a bunch of command-line tools), that maybe we'd get lucky or something. But i guess they really want it stone-cold dead and don't care about preserving historic media authored in the format.
Gnash works really well for most pre-Actionscript-3 flashes, but has been abandoned and gets harder to build every year. It's also been removed from Debian, so I'm building it using the old (now removed) Debian patches plus a couple of my own. It's a shame that none of the AS3 flash implementation attempts ever just used Gnash's renderer as a base, since it appears to work way better than any other I've seen, and it seems that Flash doesn't use a very different rendering "architecture" for AS3 flashes versus older ones.
Lightspark's renderer appears to be pretty bad, and its AS3 implementation far from complete. It also has a nasty habit of segfaulting, and doesn't save session storage information (shared object "flash cookies"), even as an option for things like games that might save data.
I think Lightspark really should have used 'agg' as its rendering backend, like Gnash did.
Ruffle looks like another Rust meme, but I mainly say that because I can't get the damn thing to build and it has about three million dependencies. It also doesn't support AS3 much at all at the moment.
--
So I went and helped my friend with his busted speaker today.
Turned out the only issue was that the two tinsel leads (the braided wires) running between the voice coil and the connectors were touching each other and shorting out. Spread them apart and they worked again. Easy.
Figured it out before even removing the speakers from their housing by just poking at the terminals with an ohm meter.
QUOTE(Anime Janai @ Dec 20 2020, 07:48)

Does standardization of speaker cones even exist anymore? When it's all custom, then only the manufacturer is able to replace their own special windings in order to preserve the dynamic range and soundstage since there are multiple windings in those better speakers. Below is documentation of a Virtual Voice Coil product for emulation of this part in speaker design It's not so far-fetched because it's very similar to electrical motor winding emulation which was already done in the 1980's on PCs. But the documentation is nice as it shows pictures of different types of speaker voice coil wire windings.
Usually, with newer speakers we didn't see generic
cone sizing (easily replaceable). Especially with car audio. That meant the real trick was getting the surrounds off without damaging the original cones so that we could take out the cone and get to the coil. We usually would use with MEK (methyl ethyl ketone). You just have to let it sit for a while and then it scrapes right off usually. If your surrounds are foam, be prepared to replace them after doing this, though, since they'll likely crumble away.
But the cone and the voice coil can usually be replaced separately from each other. If you have multiple voice coils, then you might be in trouble, but the
vast majority of loudspeakers, even good ones, still use a single coil per cone, and are pretty simple as a result. Car audio was the most annoying thing, since a lot of those don't even use standard impedances or diameters.
QUOTE(Anime Janai @ Dec 20 2020, 07:48)

Of course, the manufacturer probably wants to encourage you to buy another complete new speaker instead of repairing it.
Yeah. I specifically remember Cerwin-Vega speakers being annoying in that they had special foam surrounds. My mid-70's Jensens did, too, and those were more annoying because the correct replacement pretty much doesn't exist anymore (Jensen has changed hands over 9,000 times since then). Ended up just getting a surround close enough and cutting it to fit.
QUOTE(Anime Janai @ Dec 20 2020, 07:48)

All too many manufacturers of electronics price the cost of parts about the same as the price of buying a new one. For example, it is possible to self-service some HP inkjet printers. I looked at the cost of buying just the print head and it's cost is roughly 80% the cost of just buying a whole new printer. Humbug, might as well buy a new one.
I thought printer ink being a ripoff was common knowledge at this point.
This post has been edited by dragontamer8740: Dec 21 2020, 09:16