QUOTE(uareader @ Apr 21 2019, 09:14)

I don't get it, how can web development have such a difference in portability, to cause such a post?
I am crippled on windows machines and avoid them wherever possible. In a 2-to-1 vote (a husband and wife vs me), we chose the platform I can't do any testing on.
I was reduced to writing documentation.
The last time I had windows installed on bare metal, I absolutely needed Cygwin and/or MinGW/MSYS to get anything accomplished.
Oh, also, Visual Studio nowadays takes 12 hours or so to install (and I'm barely exaggerating). That was pretty fucking annoying when I just needed to use Microsoft's old assembler a few years back, but it's even worse now.
Then, you need Active Directory, MS SQL, etc. on top of that.
I tried to warn my group that while Mono in theory is capable of doing all the stuff they wanted to do, in practice it's buggy as hell and will only do about three quarters of what it should be capable of. They just said the equivalent of "Oh, it can't be
that bad."
QUOTE(blue penguin @ Apr 21 2019, 09:40)

It's called microsoft. The third most portable software producer in the word, just after IBM and the producers of portable house cleaning african elephants.
Did you know? Prior to the adoption of all that .NET code into Mono, Mono would build and successfully run on big-endian PowerPC and/or POWER machines (And other big-endian architectures).
Not anymore, thanks to MS's "contributions" to the project.
Also, IBM's J9 used to be pretty portable. Their other offerings? Not so much.
This post has been edited by dragontamer8740: May 6 2019, 05:54