[X] My Assistant

And FYI
Taglist page: https://e-hentai.org/tools.php?act=taglist&...;uid=YourUserId ;

Did know about it. Currently I have

CODE

Started Accuracy = 100% of 78
Voted Accuracy = 100% of 1115

Last one question (sorry DJNoni) - how often I should check that page to be sure I am tagging everything right?
Every three days?

Changed my avatar but still shows old pic, is there something i must do for it to show properly?

This post has been edited by Draw99Gray: Oct 12 2017, 18:12

Tagging experts, getting 0,19 in tagging for 7 days is a good sign? I don't really know...
It was 0,16 yesterday, today it is 0,19 - does it mean that I am doing everything right? (IMG:[invalid] style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)

A word of advice on tagging: please don't tag anything that you are not 100% sure of. Same goes for upvoting existing tags. Best way to go about tagging is: read all definitions of tags you want to use, only then start using them. New tags is better than upvoting, by the way.

Simple example:
New gallery, untagged. You see it's Russian. You know that the language is Russian, no doubt. Then you tag l:russian. And your tag score goes up.

aye. tag mods really do care about accuracy.

But don't forget that nothing matters if you tag following the rules but you do it "too much in a row".

You'll get scolded no matter what is your accuracy (IMG:[invalid] style_emoticons/default/duck.gif)

i guess it could be due to the fact they may see it as "prof/toplist farming". it's seen as a really bad thing. you should prove that you don't have such intentions.
feel free to ask to tag mods why and how in vigilante section. they don't lurk too often here, and your question may be pending for a bit of time.

Yes, you get a mail with a warning that severe consequences may follow. (IMG:[invalid] style_emoticons/default/dry.gif)

hey, we already discussed that, didn't we? (IMG:[invalid] style_emoticons/default/heh.gif)

Changed my avatar but still shows old pic, is there something i must do for it to show properly?

CTRL + F5, iirc.

hey, we already discussed that, didn't we? (IMG:[invalid] style_emoticons/default/heh.gif)

The nope is a false statement. And i cant stand a false statement about a topic that piss me like this one. Yeah, i know, i am a bad person without a 100% accuracy (Voted Accuracy = 99% of 62557), so i deserve every blame and any severe consequences you can come up with. (IMG:[invalid] style_emoticons/default/mad.gif)

The nope is a false statement. And i cant stand a false statement about a topic that piss me like this one. Yeah, i know, i am a bad person without a 100% accuracy (Voted Accuracy = 99% of 62557), so i deserve every blame and any severe consequences you can come up with. (IMG:[invalid] style_emoticons/default/mad.gif)

my accuracy is even lower than yours (IMG:[invalid] style_emoticons/default/heh.gif)

however, once again i can assure you that no mods were biased towards you. they merely looked at numbers.

All i see is a 99% that is not good enough for them and all i remember are severe consequences. And i can assure you, i didnt tag a single smegging gallery after our conversation and cant see a single reason, why i should change that. (IMG:[invalid] style_emoticons/default/mad.gif)

A word of advice on tagging: please don't tag anything that you are not 100% sure of. Same goes for upvoting existing tags. Best way to go about tagging is: read all definitions of tags you want to use, only then start using them. New tags is better than upvoting, by the way.

Yeah, new tags get 20 more power compared to the voted ones, for me at least.

i guess it could be due to the fact they may see it as "prof/toplist farming". it's seen as a really bad thing. you should prove that you don't have such intentions.
feel free to ask to tag mods why and how in vigilante section. they don't lurk too often here, and your question may be pending for a bit of time.

Don't worry, I already got confirmed that tagging with barely above the minimum allowed accuracy to not get a negative mod power score, but doing it less than moderately often is encouraged, while tagging flawlessly, but voting several hundreds tag in a day, is not. And this is apparently a rule, since when I stated that the rule, written in the wiki and in some rule posts in the forum, says absolutely nothing about the number of tags per minute being a negative thing, but only about their low accuracy being a bad thing, I got answered very rudely (IMG:[invalid] style_emoticons/default/heh.gif)

Not that I care. I don't have the time to tag that much, and my accuracies are currently 97%/100%, on 2000~ tags (IMG:[invalid] style_emoticons/default/duck.gif)

This post has been edited by End Of All Hope: Oct 12 2017, 18:36

but voting several hundreds tag in a day, is not.

Because it's suspicious behavior. People try to rush to get into the toplists, blindly tagging and voting without looking and causing huge messes all for selfish purposes. We don't need blind taggers, otherwise we would just use bots.

uh... well, i'm not sure we're competent enough to discuss about this at this point. (IMG:[invalid] style_emoticons/default/huh.gif) we don't even have to tools to check your tag histories (and i don't even want them, tbh).

you may want to wait for a gallery mod to lurk here and answer you. or go telling your cases in vigilante section. if they did a mistake, i'm pretty sure they are curious to know it as well.


[edit]: inb4 a gallery mod came here. speaking of timing... (IMG:[invalid] style_emoticons/default/duck.gif)

This post has been edited by Scremaz: Oct 12 2017, 18:46

Because it's suspicious behavior. People try to rush to get into the toplists, blindly tagging and voting without looking and causing huge messes all for selfish purposes. We don't need blind taggers, otherwise we would just use bots.

Blind tagging ≠ tagging a lot but properly.

I think the actual accuracy has to be ALWAYS taken into account before scolding someone.
Even if it may be a rush into a toplist.
If you're not accurate, you'll get negative points, and that would lead in warns/bans more than getting in a toplist.

This of course assuming you believe that all the people in the top 50/100 of anything are just good people that willingly spend their time on galleries out of pure courtesy (IMG:[invalid] style_emoticons/default/duck.gif)

This post has been edited by End Of All Hope: Oct 12 2017, 18:49

Changed my avatar but still shows old pic, is there something i must do for it to show properly?

Empty your browser cache. (IMG:[invalid] style_emoticons/default/wink.gif)

if they did a mistake, i'm pretty sure they are curious to know it as well.

But they cant do a mistake. They are allways right. So any discussion would make as much sense as explain to the pope that god doesnt exist. (IMG:[invalid] style_emoticons/default/rolleyes.gif)

But they cant do a mistake. They are allways right. So any discussion would make as much sense as explain to the pope that god doesnt exist. (IMG:[invalid] style_emoticons/default/rolleyes.gif)

how many times did you speak with them? i did quite a bit, and i can assure you that they are far from this.

either way, as i said before: i'm not sure i have the knowledge to answer you. there are better places to voice your opinion.

I have read enough from them to be sure about it. The maximum post from maximum joe just confirms my oppinion. 99% accuracy is for him equal to blind tagging. So, there is nothing to say, nothing to discuss and no opinion someone would want to hear. I really dont understand why that is something you dont get.

@Uncle Stu and @End Of All Hope
are you implying that they have monopolized the toplist and are stopping your entry in the toplist.
(IMG:[invalid] style_emoticons/default/ph34r.gif)

I imply absolute nothing. I just say how it is. You can see my accuracy here
Tagging data for user Uncle Stu (uid=873070)
Tags: 68740 (0 recent) Started Accuracy = 95% of 4922 Voted Accuracy = 99% of 62557

And i did get threatened with severe consequences because of my tagging.

Do with that informations what you want to do with them. I wont tell you what you have to think about it.

Sigh Of course you can. Why did i expect somethingselse. -.-

This post has been edited by Uncle Stu: Oct 12 2017, 20:03

You can see only your own page on that tool.

Err... not to look like a moron totally because I'm a douche, but I don't think that here is the best place to talk about tagging. (IMG:[invalid] style_emoticons/default/duck.gif)

Err... not to look like a moron totally because I'm a douche, but I don't think that here is the best place to talk about tagging. (IMG:[invalid] style_emoticons/default/duck.gif)

yes, i told it thrice only in this page...