Loading. Please Wait... 
 |
 |
 |
The Official Hentaiverse Chat, Post your random thoughts or theorycrafts about HV |
|
Feb 27 2016, 10:04
|
Fap.Fap
Group: Gold Star Club
Posts: 1,559
Joined: 19-October 11

|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Feb 27 2016, 23:30
|
nec1986
Group: Gold Star Club
Posts: 2,569
Joined: 12-October 14

|
QUOTE(sssss2 @ Feb 23 2016, 20:53)  1H mage Imperil style is ambiguous. It requires a deal of concentration but much slower than classic mage.
Oh, thats why i misunderstood you. You did 1h mage without imperil. I was curious about that result. Indeed that doesnt work. Its more transition style for melee players around 300 level. Or for players who dont wanna cure/use scrolls in pffest, because advantage of that is huge damage reduction. For example i used random waki without forge and old force shield. Finished pffest with something around 300 cures/hp pots. I had to use 6-7 sp elixirs, but in remain it was ok. Slight losing in mp pots, all others in plus. With same strategy and my mage set i d probably flee at 200-300 round with much higher overall curing. So its indeed huge difference in defense. About speed. I used more or less random phase with ~5 forge, 10% damage perk and my turns was 16k for full fest. Thats 1,5-2 hours, because 1h mage has something average between 1h and mage`s t/s. I think thats not so bad... I mean almost any 300 level can equip few phases and finish pffest in 2 hours. Thats... impressive. But it should be used only with imperil and its also good when player has ofc set, because its very powerful hit for free.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Feb 29 2016, 21:05
|
Necromusume
Group: Catgirl Camarilla
Posts: 7,334
Joined: 17-May 12

|
It's my birthday. Since I was born on 29 February, I only have a birthday once every 4 years, which is why I act like I'm 10 even though I'm actually 40. Stop looking like you believed it. Cocks 
|
|
|
|
Feb 29 2016, 21:08
|
Void Domain
Group: Catgirl Camarilla
Posts: 2,131
Joined: 30-May 10

|
QUOTE(mechafujoshi @ Mar 1 2016, 03:05)  It's my birthday. Since I was born on 29 February, I only have a birthday once every 4 years, which is why I act like I'm 10 even though I'm actually 40. Stop looking like you believed it. Cocks  btw your sig scares me (IMG:[ invalid] style_emoticons/default/cry.gif)
|
|
|
|
Feb 29 2016, 21:15
|
nec1986
Group: Gold Star Club
Posts: 2,569
Joined: 12-October 14

|
QUOTE(mechafujoshi @ Feb 29 2016, 22:05)  It's my birthday. Since I was born on 29 February
Happy birthday. My relative was born 28 and her son also 29. Its probably not so uncommon )
|
|
|
|
Feb 29 2016, 21:37
|
f4tal
Group: Members
Posts: 2,662
Joined: 10-January 13

|
QUOTE Its probably not so uncommon ) I have a relative, born 29th feb too. He celebrate his birthday 1st march to avoid confusion =) Yeah, happy birthday and good luck! ^^
|
|
|
|
Feb 29 2016, 22:22
|
Sapo84
Group: Gold Star Club
Posts: 3,332
Joined: 14-June 09

|
QUOTE(nec1986 @ Feb 29 2016, 20:15)  My relative was born 28 and her son also 29. Its probably not so uncommon )
I really hope it's uncommon, since a software I worked on bugs out with people born on the 29th, and it's still in production and unpatched (IMG:[ invalid] style_emoticons/default/heh.gif) (IMG:[ invalid] style_emoticons/default/duck.gif)
|
|
|
|
Feb 29 2016, 22:38
|
Litez
Lurker
Group: Lurkers
Posts: 1
Joined: 21-January 16

|
This is my chance to post something on Feb 29! Uh...hi! MLPverse is pretty good. Edit: Although it does go slow in the beginning.
This post has been edited by Litez: Feb 29 2016, 22:39
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Feb 29 2016, 23:06
|
Sapo84
Group: Gold Star Club
Posts: 3,332
Joined: 14-June 09

|
QUOTE(Scremaz @ Feb 29 2016, 22:00)  you know, as any other day you have roughly 0.27% to be born in such day. maybe slightly more since 9 months prior it was roughly Easter holidays (IMG:[ invalid] style_emoticons/default/tongue.gif) The problem is the list of 100+ people that fails when one is born on the 29th. Now I know that checking current date > new date(day of birth, month of birth, current year) to see if the person already had his birthday is a pretty stupid idea (actually the real error was the lack of unit testing, but that's another story).
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Feb 29 2016, 23:22
|
Cleavs
Group: Gold Star Club
Posts: 24,322
Joined: 18-January 07

|
QUOTE(Sapo84 @ Feb 29 2016, 22:06)  The problem is the list of 100+ people that fails when one is born on the 29th. Now I know that checking current date > new date(day of birth, month of birth, current year) to see if the person already had his birthday is a pretty stupid idea (actually the real error was the lack of unit testing, but that's another story).
just wondering, and what about identifying every day of the year with an unique numeric ID? like 15th January = 15, 30th March = 89 (if usual year) / 90 (if leap year) and so on? plus a little algorithm to check whether a year is leap or not (basically yes every 4 years, no every 100 years, yes again every 400)
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Feb 29 2016, 23:35
|
Sapo84
Group: Gold Star Club
Posts: 3,332
Joined: 14-June 09

|
QUOTE(Scremaz @ Feb 29 2016, 22:22)  just wondering, and what about identifying every day of the year with an unique numeric ID? like 15th January = 15, 30th March = 89 (if usual year) / 90 (if leap year) and so on? plus a little algorithm to check whether a year is leap or not (basically yes every 4 years, no every 100 years, yes again every 400)
Since C# already has good Datetime manipulation the code now looks like: CODE var age = DateTime.Today.Year - DoB.Year; if (DateTime.Today < DoB.AddYears(age)) age--;
|
|
|
|
Feb 29 2016, 23:40
|
Cleavs
Group: Gold Star Club
Posts: 24,322
Joined: 18-January 07

|
QUOTE(Sapo84 @ Feb 29 2016, 22:35)  Since C# already has good Datetime manipulation the code now looks like: CODE var age = DateTime.Today.Year - DoB.Year; if (DateTime.Today < DoB.AddYears(age)) age--;
ah. alright, seems fine
|
|
|
|
Mar 1 2016, 04:24
|
Ea-Moon
Group: Gold Star Club
Posts: 1,870
Joined: 4-February 15

|
February 29 always strikes me as a funny system, simply because if you look into it you realise the rabbit hole goes down deeper than just 'once every 4 years'.
28 days in February
UNLESS the year is a multiple of 4, in which case it's 29 days
UNLESS the year is a multiple of 100, in which case it's 28 days
UNLESS the year is a multiple of 400, in which case it's 29 days
(2000 had 29 days, but 1800, 1900, 2100, 2200, etc will have 28 days)
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Mar 1 2016, 09:32
|
Void Domain
Group: Catgirl Camarilla
Posts: 2,131
Joined: 30-May 10

|
QUOTE(Ea-Moon @ Mar 1 2016, 10:24)  February 29 always strikes me as a funny system, simply because if you look into it you realise the rabbit hole goes down deeper than just 'once every 4 years'.
28 days in February
UNLESS the year is a multiple of 4, in which case it's 29 days
UNLESS the year is a multiple of 100, in which case it's 28 days
UNLESS the year is a multiple of 400, in which case it's 29 days
(2000 had 29 days, but 1800, 1900, 2100, 2200, etc will have 28 days)
Yep its very interesting, I remember its still 1 day off per ~8000 years?
|
|
|
|
Mar 3 2016, 02:48
|
Honeycat
Group: Catgirl Camarilla
Posts: 61,656
Joined: 25-February 07

|
QUOTE(Scremaz @ Mar 2 2016, 11:37)  I did this one. Do you want me to PM it to you or post it here in a link? Send a million credits! (IMG:[ invalid] style_emoticons/default/happy.gif)
|
|
|
|
Mar 3 2016, 03:06
|
aiwotorimodose
Group: Members
Posts: 7,013
Joined: 23-December 11

|
|
|
|
|
Mar 3 2016, 03:19
|
Honeycat
Group: Catgirl Camarilla
Posts: 61,656
Joined: 25-February 07

|
Hey, you, don't horn in on my million credits. (IMG:[ invalid] style_emoticons/default/mad.gif) I merged the two halves and filled in the gaps which was very time consuming. In the second version, I fixed her hair a bit more and took out some of the crud. I'm not doing any more of these, my mousing wrist hurts. [attachmentid=81364] [attachmentid=81365]
|
|
|
|
3 User(s) are reading this topic (3 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
|
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|