QUOTE(Tenboro @ Sep 13 2012, 20:04)

I wouldn't bet on the rules staying unenforced forever. Or that the monster will be simply deactivated whenever they are.
If I'm understanding correctly, you seem to be saying that at some point you're going reinstate the 0.5.0 rules, and that monsters in breach of those rules will be permanently deleted.
To avoid being in breach of the rules I
specifically asked you what the rules are:
QUOTE
What exactly are the naming rules now?
As far as I understand, anything is allowed as long as it's accepted by the system and wouldn't get you banned on the forum.
The only correction you made to my post was:
QUOTE
It won't let you make a name that starts or ends with a hyphen.
This implied that I had understood the rules correctly and that Eila Ilmater Juutilainen 501st was a valid name. You reaffirmed this after I created Eila 501st when you said:
QUOTE(Tenboro @ Jun 25 2012, 21:50)

I don't care about the current name, the only real problem is when they aren't visually distinguishable.
Now you appear to have changed your mind and want to reinstate the 0.5.0 rules. You then want to apply them retroactively to all monsters created during the period when the rules weren't active.
Can we have some clarification on this because you're sending out mixed messages and nobody knows what the rules are, or if there are any rules at all.