[X] My Assistant

And how do you know that they don't believe that giving them free porn is right, regardless of source?

That's still agreeing that I'm right, just not for the same reasons I do.

That decides it then you are delusional.

And you're an idiot who has over 1000 posts, 2 awards, more than a year registered, and a stock avatar.

Did I mention you're an idiot?

Edit: Oh wait,

Most active in Spamhaus
( 606 posts / 54% of this member's active posts )

Never mind, your just a lurker who looks like a real poster.

This post has been edited by bladejtr: Aug 21 2010, 13:16

This thread would fit right in the Serious Debates forum. After all, there's a serious lack of logic that degenerates into name-calling.

This thread would fit right in the Serious Debates forum. After all, there's a serious lack of logic that degenerates into name-calling.

See, you are profiting, in entertainment.

And you're an idiot who has over 1000 posts, 2 awards, more than a year registered, and a stock avatar.

Did I mention you're an idiot?

Edit: Oh wait,

Never mind, your just a lurker who looks like a real poster.

At least i dont delete all my galleries in rage, and ban ppl from pmíng you just because they wanna discuss something OR trying to give bad karma just beacuse someone expunged 1 of your galleries according to the rules. You have 4 years register time and 0 awards what does that say about you?

This post has been edited by Eutopia: Aug 21 2010, 13:21

See, you are profiting, in entertainment.

Point.

@ Eutopia
What the fuck do awards have to do with anything?

Point.

@ Eutopia
What the fuck do awards have to do with anything?

nothing and yet he mentioned it. As much as everything else he mentioned he called me an idiot which i dont see why, anything wrong with a stock avatar does that make you "bad" for using it?

Does 50% of my post in the spamhouse make me less of a member here? while even if we removed those posts i would still have the active poster/member title. So i dont really see the point with his post at all.

This post has been edited by Eutopia: Aug 21 2010, 13:24

Valid point as well.

At least i dont delete all my galleries in rage, and ban ppl from pmíng you just because they wanna discuss something OR trying to give bad karma just beacuse someone expunged 1 of your galleries according to the rules. You have 4 years register time and 0 awards what does that say about you?

Oh, I have no problem discussing it with Doujin Moe, I just got sick of doing so in private when it would quite obviously have an affect on a significant portion of the fan base here on the site.

I gave them -k because the expunged on of my galleries without giving me the chance to remove it myself despite my asking them too ahead of time, and the expunge was not according to the rules at the time I uploaded that gallery.

Also, if you were paying any attention you'd see I have 2 awards as well.

Oh, I have no problem discussing it with Doujin Moe, I just got sick of doing so in private when it would quite obviously have an affect on a significant portion of the fan base here on the site.

I gave them -k because the expunged on of my galleries without giving me the chance to remove it myself despite my asking them too ahead of time, and the expunge was not according to the rules at the time I uploaded that gallery.

Also, if you were paying any attention you'd see I have 2 awards as well.

Did you tell him you were sick of discussing it in private and discuss it in this forum instead? if not i think we all know the reason you did it. Im sure the expunge was according to the rules, maybe some older members can confirm it but it doesnt really matter. Them pming you giving you the chance of removing it yourself is a courtesy, but not a must, so i dont see why those ppl needed the -k except that you cant accept that other ppl can defy you.

If you call just giving some money is classified as a award yeah sure i was wrong, but i still cant see the reason for you mentioning it but lets ignore that.

This post has been edited by Eutopia: Aug 21 2010, 13:34

Oh, I only paid for one of those awards, and the site classifies then as awards, not me.

As for the rest, you need to look up the definition of karma, bad karma is a perfectly natural response to a intentional discourtesy.

Ok lets say you are right, which im not saying you are, that they did deserve -k, but did they deserve the "I will -k you for as long as i can remember doing it". As far as im concerned that is just abusing the newer members because you have a higher karma lvl.

This post has been edited by Eutopia: Aug 21 2010, 13:44

Since that added up to, if I remember right, twice, and caused a change in the karma system making it harder for future -k of people, yes they deserved it, and overall I'd say the site benefited as well.

Oh, and for the record the site benefited from the rage delete as well.

Since that added up to, if I remember right, twice, and caused a change in the karma system making it harder for future -k of people, yes they deserved it, and overall I'd say the site benefited as well.

Oh, and for the record the site benefited from the rage delete as well.

I cant believe you actually think you are right for doing these things. Doing something wrong that leads to something good doesnt make it right in the end no matter how beneficial it was.

Right? No, probably not, but it provides a net benefit.

So, I don't let it bother me.

Crush them. CRUSH ALL OF THEM.

LEAVE NO SURVIVORS.

lol, k

Stuff

(IMG:[img409.imageshack.us] http://img409.imageshack.us/img409/5531/internetargument.jpg)

New? My god no. Relevant or useful? Again, not really. Still felt the need to post it though.

Am I the little girl or the jack ass?

Can I be the little girl?