Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

6 Pages V  1 2 3 > »   
Closed TopicStart new topic
> The Real Porn Purge

 
post Jul 12 2010, 13:11
Post #1
Tenboro

Admin




I've been seeing a lot of concerns from a number of people, some in private and others in public, about the recently initiated purge of "real porn" from Galleries. I've already posted my thoughts about this here, which can be succinctly summed up as "today's situation is unsustainable". Mixed galleries of random people has already been banned, primarily for age verification reasons, but the recent movement aims to remove all real porn that would otherwise qualify as "Misc", but this is being heavily objected against by other people.

Due to this, I've decided to start a more formal feedback process about the situation

Essentially, I see two sustainable alternatives that are both more restrictive than status quo. You won't be restricted to these two in your response, but please indicate which of them you'd prefer.


Alternative 1

"Misc" real porn will be banned entirely. Any subjective or objective quality will be disregarded, and as long as it depicts real subjects, only those that fit within either of the two official categories will be allowed.


Alternative 2

"Misc" real porn will still be allowed, but the existing quality rules will be tightened up and enforced more vigorously. Mixed galleries will still be banned, and a new expunge category will be introduced for "Low-quality real porn" - unlike Garbage, this expunge category will qualify for the automated abuse ban for galleries posted after the change is made.

As quality is subjective, some guidelines will obviously need to be established to quantity a RP gallery. Furthermore, the expunge system will likely be augmented with the ability to vote against an expunge.


I'm also looking at implementing some changes to the Misc limit suggested by Shadow Weaver, that involves having to buy additional slots past a certain point.

You are only allowed to make a single post in this thread. Do not argue with other people or their opinions, just state your own views on the matter.

Again, this is not a majority decision. Obviously, if you're an active contributor or active in the Vigilante your voice will count for more than random lurkers, and I'll be weighing the responses to decide what changes to make.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

 
post Jul 12 2010, 13:22
Post #2
shiki666



Regular Poster
*****
Group: Members
Posts: 519
Joined: 27-January 09
Level 321 (Godslayer)


I prefer Alternative 2. Its not perfect and I do have some reservations about it but given the choice its less restrictive than the former. I'm all for as much freedom in information as possible so I give my support for #2. Its obviously the lesser of two evils here.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

 
post Jul 12 2010, 13:22
Post #3
HybridGuardian



Veteran Poster
********
Group: Members
Posts: 2,627
Joined: 27-March 10
Level 109 (Ascended)


I vote for Alternative 2. Because a complete ban seems unjustified.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

 
post Jul 12 2010, 13:31
Post #4
sauriu



JMSDF Steel Maiden
********
Group: Members
Posts: 3,137
Joined: 2-May 09
Level 321 (Destined)


I also agree with the Alternative 2.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

 
post Jul 12 2010, 13:33
Post #5
bladejtr



The Goddess of Loot and Harvest?
***********
Group: Gold Star Club
Posts: 10,969
Joined: 9-April 07
Level 114 (Ascended)


To be honest I have no preference between the two.
As long as there is a manageable solution to the current situation I'm for it.
The current effort just was the only feasible solution I saw with the current system in place.

Edit: spelling is hard.

This post has been edited by bladejtr: Jul 12 2010, 14:35
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

 
post Jul 12 2010, 13:54
Post #6
Leen



Newcomer
*
Group: Gold Star Club
Posts: 10
Joined: 8-February 07
Level 147 (Lord)


Alt 2 since it seems the most reasonable and fair to everyone

Wow i haven't posted at all since joining in 07 i really need to pay more attention to things

This post has been edited by Leen: Jul 12 2010, 13:56
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

 
post Jul 12 2010, 14:13
Post #7
Cumsprite



An Italian Pervert
*******
Group: Gold Star Club
Posts: 2,057
Joined: 16-August 08
Level 235 (Lord)


I vote for Alternative 2.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

 
post Jul 12 2010, 14:14
Post #8
Msgr. Radixius



If Your Crotch Don't Tingle, It Ain't Based
************
Group: Gold Star Club
Posts: 30,859
Joined: 15-May 06
Level 257 (Ascended)


QUOTE(bladejtr @ Jul 12 2010, 06:33) *

To be honest I have no preference between the two.
As long as there is a manageable solution to the current situation I'm for it.
The current effort just was to only feasible solution I saw with the current system in place.


Agreed.

EDIT: Although I am worried that this vote to reverse expunge thing might cause a shitstorm if not done correctly. Would it just reduce the percentage by their expunge power? Because that's really the only way I can see it working, even though it won't help that much in this case due to mostly lurkers with low power are trying to fight it and regulars with high power are going to consider the slight reduction in percentage negligible.

This post has been edited by radixius: Jul 12 2010, 15:43
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

 
post Jul 12 2010, 14:15
Post #9
Red of EHCOVE



Viceroy of Oook & EHCOVE cofounder
**********
Group: Gold Star Club
Posts: 9,493
Joined: 28-April 07
Level 365 (Godslayer)


Alt 1 is clean and simple (in a nuclear option way).

Alt 2 has the potential to keep some valuable content but...how to define HQ? Eye of the beholder, I am afraid; occasionally I'll find a rp gallery that was expunged that I actually liked... anyway, all of this is made 100x more difficult due to deluge of crap.

I don't have a good solution; the only thing I can think of is to have all the real porn galleries not viewable to public (to discourage n00b spam), listed in a SOCOM form, reviewed and voted on by the community, and after a set amount of time, all galleries under certain vote score would be killed. Downside is that this solution would consume time away form other, more needed (?) vigi tasks...

On that note, what would help in reviewing misc would be if we could create official classes for 3d and non-h western (two big subsets in misc that I think have some redeeming value). This is not OT, as by reclassing them we would make it easier to see and review the rest of the misc category.

This post has been edited by Red_Piotrus: Jul 12 2010, 14:16
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

 
post Jul 12 2010, 14:29
Post #10
Jonavrek



Legendary Poster
***********
Group: Members
Posts: 12,895
Joined: 29-September 08
Level 500 (Godslayer)


QUOTE(Tenboro @ Jul 12 2010, 18:11) *

Alternative 2

"Misc" real porn will still be allowed, but the existing quality rules will be tightened up and enforced more vigorously. Mixed galleries will still be banned, and a new expunge category will be introduced for "Low-quality real porn" - unlike Garbage, this expunge category will qualify for the automated abuse ban for galleries posted after the change is made.

I prefer this.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

 
post Jul 12 2010, 14:33
Post #11
Rikis



Bringer of Light
********
Group: Gold Star Club
Posts: 3,680
Joined: 7-July 09
Level 500 (Godslayer)


QUOTE(Tenboro @ Jul 12 2010, 14:11) *
Furthermore, the expunge system will likely be augmented with the ability to vote against an expunge.
Nice.

Both alternatives sound acceptable to me. Though, 1st one is simplest.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

 
post Jul 12 2010, 15:18
Post #12
ttaz



Lurker
Group: Lurkers
Posts: 1
Joined: 28-February 09
Level 25 (Apprentice)


Throwing in a meaningless random lurker vote for Alternative 2.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

 
post Jul 12 2010, 15:32
Post #13
ZloiD



Newcomer
*
Group: Recruits
Posts: 19
Joined: 3-March 07
Level 92 (Hero)


QUOTE(Tenboro @ Jul 12 2010, 05:11) *

Alternative 2
As quality is subjective, some guidelines will obviously need to be established to quantity a RP gallery. Furthermore, the expunge system will likely be augmented with the ability to vote against an expunge.


Vote for Alternative 2 (IMG:[invalid] style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

 
post Jul 12 2010, 15:52
Post #14
Panuru



il principe del regno della pasta
*********
Group: Gold Star Club
Posts: 6,351
Joined: 14-July 08
Level 429 (Godslayer)


Alternative 2
If the fundamental quality review standards are handed down from on high. If the users have to build them from scratch, it will take forever to get the thing started and probably start splinter groups with their own ideas (vigilante vigilantes). They could be extended after debate, similarly to the expunge guidelines.

edit: "fundamental" meaning "standards will never drop below this, so users can act on them immediately" /edit

QUOTE(Tenboro @ Jul 12 2010, 06:11) *

I'm also looking at implementing some changes to the Misc limit suggested by Shadow Weaver, that involves having to buy additional slots past a certain point.

Please have the limit start at zero or one and make the longevity factor on the order or months rather than days. Also tying it to power / hath / donation would let people put things up more quickly.

This post has been edited by Panuru: Jul 12 2010, 15:55
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

 
post Jul 12 2010, 15:58
Post #15
Ebil☆Panda



PanPan
***********
Group: Gold Star Club
Posts: 18,015
Joined: 26-December 05
Level 371 (Godslayer)


Alt+1
i come here for the doujins/manga, not the so-so, why-am-i-bothering-to-look-at-this RP misc images
and it's damn annoying when i'm trying to look through the first few pages and i'm hitting 1rp gallery after another
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

 
post Jul 12 2010, 16:08
Post #16
hgbdd



Godslayer Angelic Belldandy (On vacations)
**********
Group: Gold Star Club
Posts: 8,365
Joined: 8-December 08
Level 500 (Ponyslayer)


QUOTE(Ebil☆Panda @ Jul 12 2010, 14:58) *

i come here for the doujins/manga, not the so-so, why-am-i-bothering-to-look-at-this RP misc images
and it's damn annoying when i'm trying to look through the first few pages and i'm hitting 1rp gallery after another
You won't see any misc gallery, if you disable misc in the config page.

Also I vote for alternative 2
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

 
post Jul 12 2010, 16:19
Post #17
Zunami



Last one alive, lock the door!
******
Group: Gold Star Club
Posts: 907
Joined: 5-September 08
Level 308 (Ascended)


Alternative 2 sounds good for me and my RP-Galleries. (IMG:[invalid] style_emoticons/default/sleep.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

 
post Jul 12 2010, 16:22
Post #18
Sonic



Assassin Chef
********
Group: Catgirl Camarilla
Posts: 4,687
Joined: 16-November 07
Level 500 (Dovahkiin)


I vote for Alternative 1.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

 
post Jul 12 2010, 16:33
Post #19
fire dragon



Lurker
Group: Lurkers
Posts: 1
Joined: 2-December 09
Level 29 (Apprentice)


I vote for alternative 2
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

 
post Jul 12 2010, 16:37
Post #20
9who3



Lurker
Group: Recruits
Posts: 3
Joined: 8-July 08


This has become one of my favorite sites, because there isn´t much that isn´t here...
And what´s missing, will not be missed by me...
I vote my little cent for : !!! """ 2 """ !!!
Let there be porn of all kinds!
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post


6 Pages V  1 2 3 > » 
Closed TopicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 


Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 28th June 2025 - 15:14