[X] My Assistant

I've just got a pony chart with four ponies in it. Is this right?
[i.imgur.com] https://i.imgur.com/PQ9N61Y.jpg

Also is it possible to make fluttershy not stack on anyone else? She just disappears whenever she's stacked. So far my strategy is if I can't find the third horse, it's probably just fluttershy.

I've just got a pony chart with four ponies in it. Is this right?
[i.imgur.com] https://i.imgur.com/PQ9N61Y.jpg

Also is it possible to make fluttershy not stack on anyone else? She just disappears whenever she's stacked. So far my strategy is if I can't find the third horse, it's probably just fluttershy.

Oh, I think there should be five.
Two Rarity
Two Pinkie Pie
One Rainbow Dash

I've just got a pony chart with four ponies in it. Is this right?
[i.imgur.com] https://i.imgur.com/PQ9N61Y.jpg

Also is it possible to make fluttershy not stack on anyone else? She just disappears whenever she's stacked. So far my strategy is if I can't find the third horse, it's probably just fluttershy.

This is right, there is one image of two ponies and it's a pinkie riding a pinkie, that counts at 1.

Also I suggest not doing that, I believe it was shown it is more harmful to get one wrong that it is not to answer it, at least that has been my strategy and I haven't ever gotten in the red....yet.

It's suppose to be harder the longer your play and the higher level you are, so it seems likely it is harder.

No wonder my ISK puzzles are very hard.
I think the time of playing and accuracy are also included into the difficulty. I got several visionally "unclear" puzzles and then got one looking a bit clear.

This is right, there is one image of two ponies and it's a pinkie riding a pinkie, that counts at 1.

Also I suggest not doing that, I believe it was shown it is more harmful to get one wrong that it is not to answer it, at least that has been my strategy and I haven't ever gotten in the red....yet.

Mee, too. I only select the ones which I'm sure about, although I still got red in ISK. I think partial answer is better than wrong answer.

Seriously, why do we get something on the level of crappiness of Google Recaptcha with the Riddle Master? (IMG:[invalid] style_emoticons/default/sad.gif)
I remember 2 or 3 versions ago, it was still friendly, not that hard to recognize things, and using the provided link to existing ponies, if you were really willing to do it seriously, you had 100% chances of getting it right.
What's the point of the thing in its current state?
Does it protect against something really worth that much? Wasn't there a better solution, both for the player and the hardware involved?
I just don't understand how we ended up in that situation. I don't see any "win" for anybody worth that. (IMG:[invalid] style_emoticons/default/sad.gif) (IMG:[invalid] style_emoticons/default/sad.gif)

edit: oh right, I forgot, a bug appeared: custom font choice seems to no longer affect the box displaying items brought by monsters in Monster Lab (so in my case it suddenly look HUGE)

This post has been edited by uareader: Jan 27 2022, 14:13

BUG REPORT - re-posting with additional infos, since it was probably overlooked ... (IMG:[invalid] style_emoticons/default/sad.gif)

I think I've met a little bug in this new HV.89 (only visual, but still annoying).

When you enter the Monster Lab and the Gifts window pops up, the popup background is now transparent, and the written text is illegible, as being superimposed to the text of the underlying window.

You can notice it immediately if you don't have any script active (like Monsterbation).

The problem stems from an incorrect color value (#E3E1D1EE) in the background property of the "messagebox_inner" element, as can be seen in the following inspectors image.

Changing it manually to #E3E1D1 seems enough to fix it.

(IMG:[i.ibb.co] https://i.ibb.co/VCvbN7r/Monsterlab-Bug.png)

This post has been edited by mundomuñeca: Jan 27 2022, 14:40

The ponies need to be much more distinct, especially for random encounters. Even when not using any kind of dark mode skin or overlay they are often really indistinct.

BUG REPORT

This is weird. (IMG:[invalid] style_emoticons/default/huh.gif)

I disabled the scripts, and everything continued normal.

(IMG:[imgur.com] https://imgur.com/bsGb4h4.jpg)

BUG REPORT - re-posting with additional infos, since it was probably overlooked ... (IMG:[invalid] style_emoticons/default/sad.gif)
The problem stems from an incorrect color value (#E3E1D1EE) in the background property of the "messagebox_inner" element, as can be seen in the following inspectors image.

Changing it manually to #E3E1D1 seems enough to fix it.

That's a hexadecimal notation: #RRGGBBAA , AA is an optional alpha component that represents the color's transparency.

Some older browsers support a rgba() functional notation but not an alpha-hexadecimal one.

That's a hexadecimal notation: #RRGGBBAA , AA is an optional alpha component that represents the color's transparency.

Some older browsers support a rgba() functional notation but not an alpha-hexadecimal one.

Yet it worked correctly (with same Firefox browser) up to 3 days ago, i.e. before 0.89 hit ... (IMG:[invalid] style_emoticons/default/huh.gif)

EDIT : and yes, my Firefox is about 2 years old or so (old but not really obsolete, I'd say), but is the most recent version still supporting .MAFF archives (that I use a lot).


This post has been edited by mundomuñeca: Jan 27 2022, 19:49

What it take get out of red stamina?

Get accuracy up? (if so, depend on how is average this can be very hard, or not)

Wait some time?

I not realize that can be multiple ponies when picture change (that my fault not read instructions, just thought picture change or something) and now I in red.

Since I can no see accuracy (single puzzle or overall), i not know is red because i do ~5 puzzles not realizing instructions change, or if is red because i sucking on puzzles since then (I can no tell if im still getting wrong or no...)

Also, I agree with what some others say, how can overlap can make it difficult. If the point is to be difficlt then okay i can understand, but difficult together with not knowing any information about results means learning to be better can cost me a lot of stamina (since only way I can learn if i do correct is to leave red. If i stay red i have no clue what ponies I am missing...)

Yet it worked correctly (with same Firefox browser) up to 3 days ago, i.e. before 0.89 hit ... (IMG:[invalid] style_emoticons/default/huh.gif)

Firefox has supported hexadecimal alpha notation since [caniuse.com] Firefox 49 which is six years old.

Browsers older than the current ESR are not supported, but you can of course use a userscript/style if you must.

Firefox has supported hexadecimal alpha notation since [caniuse.com] Firefox 49 which is six years old.

Browsers older than the current ESR are not supported, but you can of course use a userscript/style if you must.

Okie dokie, thx

What was the answer to this pony chart?

I see Rainbow Dash

But I'm not sure what the pony on the right is here. Maybe Flutteryshy, but i dont think that looks like in the chart... (Unless there is another rpony like rarity or on top?)

[imgur.com] https://imgur.com/a/SdkoEgi

1x rainbow dash
2x fluttershy

1x rainbow dash
2x fluttershy

Wow you are quick! Thanks.

Fluttershy hair look like it curl differently in puzzle than in chart to me (IMG:[invalid] style_emoticons/default/sad.gif) Am I the only one? (Like, in chart it go out straight to the left-of her face - but in puzzle it looks curling downward to the left)

Also:

If you do not submit the answers to the riddle within the time limit, it will automatically submit it and use the checked answers unless the answer is more than a couple seconds overdue;

Also, How can answer be more than couple seconds overdue if it automatically submit when time up?

This post has been edited by monk31: Jan 28 2022, 16:32

They aren't exactly the same as the chart, multiple images are used for each pony, the chart is just there to help you learn features for them, such as the style of hair, tail, whether they are wearing a hat, etc.

They aren't exactly the same as the chart, multiple images are used for each pony, the chart is just there to help you learn features for them, such as the style of hair, tail, whether they are wearing a hat, etc.

Ahhh, now I get it

Thanks again!

with a lot of credits (in the hundreds of millions range)

If that's the case, don't even bother making the system.
It will not be affordable and basically be pointless.

There are very few peerlesses that are actually worth that much by default, so the system would be useless for basically anything else.
Which goes literally against the point of making a new mechanic.
It just won't be used.


Also again I will repeat, making Peerlesses upgradeable is a terrible idea.
A peerless is a, like the name says, flawless equipment.
It's already perfect. It's already maxed.
Making it upgradeable doesn't make any sense.
And at that point would make upgrading legendaries to peerlesses even more pointless.
Why bother spending HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS of credits to cap a legendary when the base peerless is the same and can be upgraded further?

The whole "hundreds of million credits" range and the upgradeability of peerlesses to "uber peerlesses" is definitely in need of a very radical revision.

The name argument isn't that convincing. If it's that bothersome, just rename all current Peerless to something else like Cataclysmic, and then after we max out Cataclysmic they become the new Peerless.

Or come up with a better name for the final maxed level beyond Peerless, like Hentaifu. Yarr, behold my Hentaifu Hallowed Oak Staff of Heimdall.