|
|
|
So it has come to this, Achtung! |
|
Mar 27 2010, 16:27
|
Eutopia
Group: Members
Posts: 2,392
Joined: 15-March 09
|
is incest removed too?
|
|
|
Mar 27 2010, 16:33
|
Dlaglacz
Group: Catgirl Camarilla
Posts: 7,899
Joined: 6-March 08
|
QUOTE(Eutopia @ Mar 27 2010, 15:27) is incest removed too? If it doesn't contain loli or shota, I believe it's not. Judging by the first post, the galleries were removed when tagged with one of the tags: lolicon, shotacon or bestiality.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mar 27 2010, 16:42
|
Ratio
Group: Members
Posts: 2,695
Joined: 16-June 08
|
This situation really reminds me of what happened to danbooru quite awhile back. What they did was that they didn't ban loli or shota, but are blocked for users without an invite, i.e. those below privileged, contributor, janitor, moderator or administrator status.
This way the advertisers wouldn't know what was happening behind the scenes (well sort of, at least enough for them not to bitch about it as these people who report wouldn't really know about it as well).
Management-wise, I see two problems with what's happening right now:
1. Wouldn't this make tagging abuse more severe? Someone can easily tag something as shota/loli/beastiality and then would be banned outright (danbooru makes it turn invisible to some users, but it is not really a problem since there aren't much posts anyway).
2. How are things to be filtered out magazine circles that publish some shota/loli content? (e.g. comic megastore or comic masyo).
The point I'm trying to make is that it is really difficult to filter out the shota/loli content (beastiality isn't so much). I don't think I've ever seen some other websites actively filtering these out, they usually just leave it uncategorized.
This post has been edited by Ratio: Mar 27 2010, 17:13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mar 27 2010, 16:43
|
Xardas100
Newcomer
Group: Gold Star Club
Posts: 24
Joined: 24-May 08
|
Mh, there was this Southpark episode, where Cartman wanted to get Family Guy off the air by making them take back an episode. Fun of moslems was the theme of that episode i believe. And then catholics could pull of another episode, and so on and so on, until Family Guy is no more.
What if that is their plan too? First lolicon, then the rest? Advertisers are easielly influenced.
If it really is just 47k$ a year, that is easy affordable by the root-everyday-check-e-hentais community.
If Tenboro doesn't act quickly, this site is done for. My suggestion would be a poll, first think you see, when you enter the galleries or the mainpage. "Are you willing to pay 5 $ a month?"
Of course, that would need an automatic system, that gets a hold of what everyone has donated in the past 3-6 months. Even if only 1 million pay, that should be enough.
Edit: @Tenboro
Maybe you had to act quick, when you recieved the news, and panicked.
Take a break, a few days off this matter. You have a great site, a good community. We can make it. Without making sacrifices for our enemys.
Bad english, i know, but i hope i make sense.
This post has been edited by Xardas100: Mar 27 2010, 17:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mar 27 2010, 16:44
|
Boniface
Group: Members
Posts: 111
Joined: 22-August 07
|
I still just think the people who complained to the advertisers should be banned T_T
|
|
|
Mar 27 2010, 16:45
|
wongkp
Lurker
Group: Recruits
Posts: 6
Joined: 22-August 09
|
THEY CAME FIRST for the lolicon, and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a lolicon
THEN THEY CAME for the bestiality manga, and I didn't speak up because I don't watch bestiality manga .... .... THEN THEY CAME for the incest...rape...violence...
|
|
|
Mar 27 2010, 16:50
|
Delta100
Lurker
Group: Recruits
Posts: 2
Joined: 27-March 10
|
I'm not a fan of loli or beastiality, but clearly this isn't limited to just them. So much hentai has just disappeared from the search. It's quite sad. If I type in 'stockings' in the search, all of the hentai with 'stockings' in the tag has just disappeared. Quite sad. QUOTE(Eutopia @ Mar 27 2010, 10:27) is incest removed too?
As for incest, I typed in incest, and I get no hits. This post has been edited by Delta100: Mar 27 2010, 16:52
|
|
|
Mar 27 2010, 16:55
|
dice201
Newcomer
Group: Recruits
Posts: 12
Joined: 8-December 09
|
To bad about the ruling but it is what it is. Altough , some stuff that would be considered alright is missing as well (IMG:[ invalid] style_emoticons/default/faint.gif) This post has been edited by dice201: Mar 27 2010, 16:56
|
|
|
Mar 27 2010, 17:08
|
Eutopia
Group: Members
Posts: 2,392
Joined: 15-March 09
|
QUOTE(Dlaglacz @ Mar 27 2010, 15:33) If it doesn't contain loli or shota, I believe it's not. Judging by the first post, the galleries were removed when tagged with one of the tags: lolicon, shotacon or bestiality.
Make a incest tag search you will see that all are gone. I really doubt each and every incest gallery contains the lolicon/shotacon tag.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mar 27 2010, 17:10
|
Pleinaire
Lurker
Group: Recruits
Posts: 2
Joined: 14-May 08
|
Does this apply to just 'lolicon' more or less young children or you plan to expand it to what they asked to later on? (~covering 90% of this sites content )
Keep in mind that almost all Doujinshis here is based on school girls, also very very big part of the mangas as well, You can pretty much classified most content into the school girls category, girls under 18 years old.
I'm just curious of what type of doubble moral this site will run now, however I'm out of it thx it was a good site till today. I will for sure miss it.
|
|
|
Mar 27 2010, 17:13
|
Zorbius
Group: Members
Posts: 306
Joined: 2-August 09
|
What does this mean for furry?
|
|
|
Mar 27 2010, 17:14
|
sondolin
Lurker
Group: Lurkers
Posts: 1
Joined: 20-April 09
|
yeah the double morals will come back to bite you in teh ass later on, since theyll want you to remove all the content that features underaged fictional characters, even if they are portrayed as adults. That crap happens all the time.
|
|
|
Mar 27 2010, 17:15
|
Eutopia
Group: Members
Posts: 2,392
Joined: 15-March 09
|
QUOTE(Zorbius @ Mar 27 2010, 16:13) What does this mean for furry?
Gone forever (IMG:[ invalid] style_emoticons/default/anime_cry.gif) Edit: So i thought but the tag is still working. So for now its still here This post has been edited by Eutopia: Mar 27 2010, 17:18
|
|
|
Mar 27 2010, 17:24
|
Mirukui
Lurker
Group: Recruits
Posts: 7
Joined: 10-December 09
|
I don't post like... ever. I just wanted to comment on the irony of our advertisers displaying pictures of questionably aged girls in order to get us to their site (face it, they are middle school girls with semen photoshopped on them), and they are banning depictions of lolicon/shotacon? On a side note, what about Evangeline A.K. McDowell? She's an old vampire in a young body. (IMG:[ invalid] style_emoticons/default/tongue.gif)
|
|
|
Mar 27 2010, 17:27
|
Setebos
Group: Catgirl Camarilla
Posts: 728
Joined: 30-August 09
|
I won't miss Loli, but I hate the fact that the monthly Comics with 1 or 2 Loli stories are now verbotten. I always read around the Loli. I have nothing useful to offer, it will get worse before it gets better. Loli has to disappear and governments will force it to the harm of hentai in general.
|
|
|
Mar 27 2010, 17:30
|
ChocoNutz
Group: Members
Posts: 162
Joined: 20-May 09
|
Lost a couple of my galleries. One was loli and cannot be fixed but the others I will attempt to clean and republish.
I hope that just tagging 'lolicon' doesn't get a gallery removed. Too easily abused. Too much power in any one person's hand. I would rather see it be a magic tag and have to reach 100 before the gallery is segregated giving a moderator a chance to check it out and if the gallery is verboten, then it is purged.
|
|
|
Mar 27 2010, 17:39
|
Mant
Group: Members
Posts: 119
Joined: 4-June 07
|
Tagging a gallery as lolicon gets it instantly removed.
|
|
|
Mar 27 2010, 17:40
|
Ratio
Group: Members
Posts: 2,695
Joined: 16-June 08
|
QUOTE(Liquid Drygun @ Mar 27 2010, 15:24) Oh man, just what this thread needs: Suckups and pussies.
At lest I get some of my stash somewhere else (Torrents, any1?) so yeah.
LET THE DRAMA LLAMA IN!!!
WOOHOO
Sucks to be Tenboro right now though having to deal with this.
Oh well...
It has begun
|
|
|
3 User(s) are reading this topic (3 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
|
|
|
|
|