QUOTE(-terry- @ Mar 20 2023, 10:34)

I don't need a car at the moment, i live in the city to study and public transport is good. My last car was a Volvo with 460k km, bought it for $1. Basically you get a free car (that hopefully still works until the equivalent of the MOT in my cunt runs out) and then pay to scrap it, the reason the owner lets it go for free is to not pay the scraping fee. It lasted 2 months, all i needed it for so it was worth it i guess. Obviously a death machine although it did have ABS so not as bad as one might think.
If this was a volvo 300/400 series, yes, death machine.
Otherwise, it is likely one of the safest cars available in the year of manufacture, if it's at least 25 years old or so. According to crash tests anyway.
QUOTE(meow_pao @ Mar 21 2023, 10:15)

Is that still true for the more recent models?
Not really. They can still be dependable, but as Mags said the maintenance for them costs so much more (which is helped by the proprietary software they use).
Most recent I can actually recommend in good conscience is the 900 series. Also, only the ones with four cylinder engines. Five or six cylinders is asking for trouble, especially if it's the V6 (rather than the inline 6). The inline 6 is basically the engine they used in front wheel drive models (not quite, but almost) - and it suffers all the other modern car problems the 850 model does. In the US, the last four cylinder rear wheel drive Volvos were the 940's in the 1995 model year; some other countries got them longer.
The delorean uses about the same V6 as most of the V6 volvos (except the latest), btw. Because it was basically the only motor they could buy off the shelf.
There's a pretty clean cut between the rear wheel drive volvos and front wheel drive ones.
QUOTE(Mags_ @ Mar 21 2023, 15:13)

It is not.
There's a 1966 p1800 with 5.23 million kilometers on it.
1980's 200 series will easily do it.
My '82 244 is on 109k
There's a 90's 740 GLE with over a million on the clock.
High mileage is still achievable in modern cars, but the amount of maintenance involved just isn't worth it.
Not unless you have at least over 100 grand kicking around to spend on it.
Oh, so you kept that after all? Nice.
Gotten the fuel system cleared up yet?
My '76 244 is at ~200 thousand miles (~325 thousand kilometers). So not quite as minty as yours. Actually feels more dependable than my 90s 200 series, though. Having a manual transmission also makes me trust it more (push starts are much easier).
[
i.imgur.com]
(IMG:[i.imgur.com] https://i.imgur.com/GfxlyS4g.jpg)
Regarding 80s models, '83 (maybe earlier) through sometime in '87(?) cars are plagued with an engine wiring harness where all the insulation decays off. If you fix that you're much of the way to a more dependable car. [
www.prancingmoose.com]
link.
I have a 90s 200 series wagon at about 300k miles (~580k kilometers) that I'm giving to a relative soon.
Got a different family member with a late 60's Volvo amason that has no-one-knows how many miles on it because the odometer's stuck.
Yeah the lower engine block is basically the same between an 1800 and a 200 series. Different cylinder head (aluminum instead of forged steel).
That 1800 had the engine swapped at around 2 million miles (3.2 million km), apparently it was "losing compression."
RWD volvos are my favorites. Probably because a lot of my earlier memories are from when I was riding in 200 and 700 series cars. And even 100 series.
(IMG:[
i.imgur.com]
https://i.imgur.com/pk6jYRp.jpg)
This post has been edited by dragontamer8740: Mar 21 2023, 19:58