 |
 |
 |
[Suggestion] A few requests, Can we has... |
|
Apr 13 2012, 06:02
|
FWX
Newcomer
 Group: Members
Posts: 37
Joined: 23-June 09

|
can stunned monsters lower their evade its kinda ironic if a warrior misses a STUNNED monster
or maybe just bad luck i have 91% hit chance though.....
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Apr 13 2012, 06:20
|
@43883
Group: Gold Star Club
Posts: 31,485
Joined: 6-March 08

|
Lol hugefont #mal. Also, Tenboro wants you to play the shit for a long time because he's that evil. QUOTE(Mika Kurogane @ Apr 12 2012, 17:24)  I'd suggest customizable base stats to make sure you don't end up with junk, but everyone would go for the best stats (and most likely the same ones) and thus this suggestion is moot and over-the-top. I'll repost that one here because I was half-serious. Needs some tweaking to prevent obvious abuse, OP stuff and whatnot, but it could work. Then again, we have the forge, but... This one is about swapping them to avoid ending up with complete junk. Like, say, you roll something like this. Obviously, you are very pissed. With this feature, you could remove all "points" from the item and reallocate them as you wish, but with a few limitations. In this case, you could swap the whole DEX bonus to AGI so you get a +9.26 AGI and no DEX instead. Yeah, that's OP. Just an example. Get the idea ? Still over-the-top ? Too much time needed ? Or perhaps unnecessary ? I think we would have less people bitching about useless legendary junk. They'd bitch about something else, of course, but... This post has been edited by Mika Kurogane: Apr 13 2012, 06:20
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Apr 13 2012, 07:02
|
LangTuTaiHoa
Group: Banned
Posts: 1,792
Joined: 8-June 10

|
QUOTE(Mika Kurogane @ Apr 13 2012, 11:20)  Lol hugefont #mal. Also, Tenboro wants you to play the shit for a long time because he's that evil.I'll repost that one here because I was half-serious. Needs some tweaking to prevent obvious abuse, OP stuff and whatnot, but it could work. Then again, we have the forge, but... This one is about swapping them to avoid ending up with complete junk. Like, say, you roll something like this. Obviously, you are very pissed. With this feature, you could remove all "points" from the item and reallocate them as you wish, but with a few limitations. In this case, you could swap the whole DEX bonus to AGI so you get a +9.26 AGI and no DEX instead. Yeah, that's OP. Just an example. Get the idea ? Still over-the-top ? Too much time needed ? Or perhaps unnecessary ? I think we would have less people bitching about useless legendary junk. They'd bitch about something else, of course, but... Maybe some material that allow you to move them little by little? Or some shard that keep the reallocation for a temporary time?
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Apr 13 2012, 07:26
|
@43883
Group: Gold Star Club
Posts: 31,485
Joined: 6-March 08

|
Something like that, yeah. Anything that prevents abuse, but makes you gear usable and with nice base stats.
|
|
|
Apr 13 2012, 07:38
|
Kaosumx
Group: Gold Star Club
Posts: 3,362
Joined: 20-February 12

|
I'd propose some sort of combining system then.
Take two or more items you own and combine them.
The first item determines the quality. The second item must be of equal or higher quality and determines the type of item (mace, phase, etc.). An optional third item of equal or higher quality can be used to determine the suffix. The resulting item is then generated as if it was a normal item, only with quality and type already determined (and possibly suffix), but given quality bonuses depending on the stats of the items used. The final average stats should always be higher than the average of the parts put in.
|
|
|
Apr 13 2012, 08:06
|
@43883
Group: Gold Star Club
Posts: 31,485
Joined: 6-March 08

|
I suggested that a while ago to get rid of the 1000 cap. It was ignored, apparently.
But your idea is much more elaborate than mine, so you shouldn't edit it out.
|
|
|
Apr 13 2012, 08:24
|
Bunker Buster
Group: Gold Star Club
Posts: 2,220
Joined: 11-June 10

|
Substantially increase physical mitigations on kite and tower shields. There's no real reason to use those in 1H for the burden/interference difference and you gain 1-2% block chance and 0.6% physical mitigation on the next "tier" of shield, which is hardly enticing.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Apr 13 2012, 08:53
|
Hoheneim
Group: Members
Posts: 1,245
Joined: 4-January 09

|
QUOTE(skillchip @ Apr 12 2012, 18:47)  Said it before, saying it again.
Please buff Protection. Both it's duration and the increase it provides. It is much less effective then SV, and also extremely less efficient as things are now. As things stand now a player would need 80% mitigation (from gear since it doesn't take into account the mitigation a player has from stats) to achieve the same additional survival as SV gives. Either decrease mana cost of Protection, increase its duration, or both. Maybe make it a 5 point skill like the other buff spells.
If Protection gave 50% mitigation increase instead of 25% A player would only need 74.5% mitigation (from gear) to get the same effect as SV.
Protection would be much more enticing if it gave 20% mitigation like it was an additional piece of gear, or worked off of the mitigation on the character tab, which is both gear and stats.
Oh, come on! You're all seasoned members and you still ask for improvements making comparisons? You know this way the two in the end will have the same effectiveness without the need to improve anything. Sometimes I wonder if you're not just messing around asking for nerfs.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Apr 13 2012, 09:16
|
skillchip
Group: Catgirl Camarilla
Posts: 5,754
Joined: 31-December 06

|
QUOTE(Hoheneim @ Apr 13 2012, 06:53)  Oh, come on! You're all seasoned members and you still ask for improvements making comparisons? You know this way the two in the end will have the same effectiveness without the need to improve anything.
Sometimes I wonder if you're not just messing around asking for nerfs.
You will never know
|
|
|
Apr 13 2012, 12:26
|
Handsome Phil
Group: Gold Star Club
Posts: 2,198
Joined: 12-July 09

|
I'd like to see a dedicated PvP Arena for those of us who want to square of against other human opponents (not just monsters).
That'd be really awesome.
This post has been edited by Handsome Phil: Apr 13 2012, 12:58
|
|
|
Apr 13 2012, 12:55
|
Bunker Buster
Group: Gold Star Club
Posts: 2,220
Joined: 11-June 10

|
QUOTE(Mika Kurogane @ Apr 13 2012, 06:20)  Like, say, you roll something like this. Obviously, you are very pissed. I'd rather like to be able to disassemble that piece of crap for some high grade cloth.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Apr 13 2012, 13:02
|
@43883
Group: Gold Star Club
Posts: 31,485
Joined: 6-March 08

|
QUOTE(Handsome Phil @ Apr 13 2012, 12:26)  I'd like to see a dedicated PvP Arena for those of us who want to square of against other human opponents (not just monsters).
That'd be really awesome. It was suggested three years ago. QUOTE(Tenboro @ Apr 27 2009, 18:10)  The problems I'd have to solve for a PvP mode are mostly identical to the ones I'd have to solve for a Co-Op mode, so it's not impossible. He said not impossible, but... I think it's still tough considering how the HV works and how old that post is. Also, more bitching, but we all enjoy that as long as it's not related to the system itself.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Apr 14 2012, 06:15
|
Pro2Type
Group: Gold Star Club
Posts: 714
Joined: 15-February 09

|
Add a "Previous Monster" and "Next Monster" button on the monster stat page in the monster lab. That way we don't have to click back to the monster list every time we want to check our critters for loot. In particular useful to us who have several pages worth of monsters. All that clicking and scrolling gets a bit tedious.
|
|
|
Apr 14 2012, 07:14
|
Coma
Group: Members
Posts: 1,575
Joined: 16-September 08

|
Also add sorting to the Monster Lab, sorted by type, by level, and by name
|
|
|
Apr 14 2012, 08:42
|
Evil Scorpio
Group: Gold Star Club
Posts: 6,565
Joined: 9-May 10

|
Can we get multiple attachments to MoogleMail messages? I'm pretty sure I'm not the first one who ask about it.
|
|
|
Apr 14 2012, 15:49
|
Ichy
Group: Catgirl Camarilla
Posts: 13,061
Joined: 19-February 09

|
When using a Shard give us the Option to choose between 240 minutes or 1000 Rounds.
|
|
|
Apr 14 2012, 16:02
|
varst
Group: Gold Star Club
Posts: 11,561
Joined: 30-March 10

|
You know that won't end in the way you like, don't you?
|
|
|
Apr 14 2012, 16:09
|
Ichy
Group: Catgirl Camarilla
Posts: 13,061
Joined: 19-February 09

|
QUOTE(varst @ Apr 14 2012, 14:02)  You know that won't end in the way you like, don't you?
Probably but having to sit there for 4 hours straight sucks (IMG:[ invalid] style_emoticons/default/sleep.gif)
|
|
|
Apr 14 2012, 16:13
|
varst
Group: Gold Star Club
Posts: 11,561
Joined: 30-March 10

|
Okay, I won't mind if there's an option. But if there isn't, then 240 minutes is definitely better than 1000 turns, especially when you consider BT/IWBTH DwD.
|
|
|
Apr 14 2012, 16:23
|
hzqr
Group: Gold Star Club
Posts: 4,672
Joined: 13-May 09

|
Why would 240 minutes work better for BT/IWBTH DwD than 1000 turns?
|
|
|
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
|
 |
 |
 |
|