[X] My Assistant

Also, I was reading through wiki and forum as well as online source. Some online source says to not use 443 for port but official wiki and forum says to use it. Why is that? 443 is still better overall, right?

443 is preferred since it's the default HTTPS port, making it less likely to be blocked by aggressive outbound network filtering. Using it generally results in somewhat higher traffic and quality for the client.

443 is preferred since it's the default HTTPS port, making it less likely to be blocked by aggressive outbound network filtering. Using it generally results in somewhat higher traffic and quality for the client.

Thank you. I will be testing various port to see which one has better result.

Has anyone ever experienced a sudden tank in hits? my 2-month old client on a vps was doing 30+ hits/minute when in a span of a week it dropped to about 21~

I did a full restart early on when I noticed the drop but unfortunately it didn't help. First time hosting hath client so no idea if this is just normal "dip"

EDIT: Seems back to "normal" hits for now (26~) though not as high as I initially had.. Hopefully it climbs back steadily soon

This post has been edited by kdeadz: Sep 7 2025, 04:23

At present, the proportion of IPv6 traffic at the entry point of China Mobile's core network is 66.16%, and the proportion of IPv6 traffic at the exit point of the core network is 71.91%. Moreover, the Cyberspace Administration of China and two other departments have issued the "Key Points for Further Promoting the Large-scale Deployment and Application of IPv6 by 2025". Data source: Chinese official

My quality has tanked I'm getting cache download fail
I'm using hath-rust I wonder if latest version has a problem or It's something in general
Help

under 2000 now so no hath

the log is filled with cache download fail starting from the 3rd september late in the day

This post has been edited by 918273: Sep 4 2025, 08:51

My quality has tanked I'm getting cache download fail
I'm using hath-rust I wonder if latest version has a problem or It's something in general
Help

under 2000 now so no hath

the log is filled with cache download fail starting from the 3rd september late in the day

You may want to check if there is a problem with your network connection to the image server, or you can try the proxy option to connect to the image server through a proxy.

james58899 It was running on latest version for multiple days without problems so not a problem with your program most likely
I don't know how to check the image server I mean I can browse the web so beyond that I don't know

I don't know how to check the image server I mean I can browse the web so beyond that I don't know

The error message contains the URL of the image server. You can try pinging the server or opening it in a browser.

The error message contains the URL of the image server. You can try pinging the server or opening it in a browser.

Hmm I have started full cache check so nothing there right now
actually It's going now for 4 hours and only 400/1227 static ranges I remember it taking 4 hours to finish on java version and yours being faster like 3 hours and that was before the static range changes that happened like a half a year ago I had over 1TB cache back then now It's only a little over 700 GB
EDIT I think a manual cache scan is much slower than a regular one so ignore the above

UPDATE so my client recovered fully quality 9300 but after the full cache scan there wasn't anything printed so cache was fine I guess actually I never had anything show up after scanning in all my years running the client just power outages forcing scans so I wonder was the problem on my side or server side hmm

This post has been edited by 918273: Sep 6 2025, 23:30

Hey, I was hoping you guys could help me understand the behavior of my H@H client.

About a year ago, I was running my H@H client off of a privacy VPN for port forwarding through the service PIA. This iteration of the client was located out of Vancouver Canada and had an average quality around 8000 with 400ish assigned static ranges. The cache is on a 2TB Sata SSD.

After experiencing one too many network interruptions (VPN caused) where the trust and quality nosedived, I ditched the VPN. The client now runs off of my ISP provided IP and port 443 in the United States. The quality sits around 9500 with nearly 100% uptime (power outages/Proxmox updating). It is assigned 70-80k KB/s upload speed, 2TB of cache space (18.61% used) and is around toplist space 500 for the past month.

My question is why isn’t the client getting assigned more static ranges? It has been at 644ish total ranges, with 255 HC, for the better part of a year. There has been some upward movement of the ranges towards P1 in the last year. But no new ranges have been assigned. I assumed when I relocated the client from Canada to the US and gave it twice the speed it would pick up ranges, but it seemingly hasn't. Are total static ranges an irrelevant metric to gauge client performance? Is this a result of the US being over-served by clients?

“The following ranges are currently assigned: P1 = 147, P2 = 149, P3 = 134, P4 = 214, HC = 255”

Thanks for reading this!

*(1.5-2 years ago the client had 6000 static ranges. However the SSD died, so I had to wipe the cache and start over. (IMG:[invalid] style_emoticons/default/cry.gif) )

There's no meaningful difference between US and CA as far as range assignments go. If it has plateaued, that's not an indictment against the client, it just means that there currently aren't any ranges available.