Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

39 Pages V « < 18 19 20 21 22 > »   
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Hentai@Home 1.6 Stable, Not the kind for horsies

 
post Sep 29 2023, 15:40
Post #381
sl4yer



Lurker
Group: Recruits
Posts: 3
Joined: 11-May 15
Level 13 (Novice)


Client 41453 cannot startup:

2023-09-29 20:34:26+7 [WARN] java.io.IOException: Server returned HTTP response code: 500 for URL: [94.100.24.68] http://94.100.24.68/15/rpc?clientbuild=160&a...
2023-09-29 20:34:26+7 [WARN] Startup Failure: FAIL_STARTUP_REPLAY;Cannot initiate startup multiple times with the same key. Restart H@H and try again.

I tried to reset client key but didn't works.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

 
post Sep 29 2023, 15:48
Post #382
SuicideTree



Newcomer
*
Group: Gold Star Club
Posts: 32
Joined: 14-August 10
Level 335 (Godslayer)


QUOTE(sl4yer @ Sep 29 2023, 16:40) *

Client 41453 cannot startup:

2023-09-29 20:34:26+7 [WARN] java.io.IOException: Server returned HTTP response code: 500 for URL: [94.100.24.68] http://94.100.24.68/15/rpc?clientbuild=160&a...
2023-09-29 20:34:26+7 [WARN] Startup Failure: FAIL_STARTUP_REPLAY;Cannot initiate startup multiple times with the same key. Restart H@H and try again.

I tried to reset client key but didn't works.


Same thing here (ID 46318), happened after I updated the client, huh? Was working fine until 4 hours ago...

"Downgrading" back to 1.6.1 didn't help.

This post has been edited by SuicideTree: Sep 29 2023, 16:05
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

 
post Sep 29 2023, 16:01
Post #383
NekoiNemo



Lurker
Group: Lurkers
Posts: 1
Joined: 24-December 12


Same with 30100. Had to restart the server and hath service didn't start up with this error
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

 
post Sep 29 2023, 16:30
Post #384
Tenboro

Admin




Hmm, looks like it didn't take kindly to a core library update. I've fixed the issue, so clients that could not start up should be able to again now.
User is online!Profile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

 
post Sep 29 2023, 16:39
Post #385
SuicideTree



Newcomer
*
Group: Gold Star Club
Posts: 32
Joined: 14-August 10
Level 335 (Godslayer)


QUOTE(Tenboro @ Sep 29 2023, 17:30) *

Hmm, looks like it didn't take kindly to a core library update. I've fixed the issue, so clients that could not start up should be able to again now.


Thanks, looks like we're back to normal.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

 
post Sep 30 2023, 01:17
Post #386
Ver Greeneyes



Newcomer
*
Group: Recruits
Posts: 10
Joined: 29-October 10
Level 125 (Lord)


I'm suddenly getting the following error after a restart:
QUOTE

2023-09-29T23:06:57Z [WARN] java.net.SocketTimeoutException: Connect timed out
2023-09-29T23:06:57Z [WARN] Retrying.. (2 tries left)
2023-09-29T23:07:02Z [WARN] java.net.SocketTimeoutException: Connect timed out
2023-09-29T23:07:02Z [WARN] Retrying.. (1 tries left)
2023-09-29T23:07:07Z [WARN] java.net.SocketTimeoutException: Connect timed out
2023-09-29T23:07:07Z [WARN] Retrying.. (0 tries left)
2023-09-29T23:07:07Z [WARN] Exhaused retries or aborted getting [rpc.hentaiathome.net] http://rpc.hentaiathome.net/15/rpc?clientb...act=server_stat
2023-09-29T23:07:07Z [ERROR] {hath.base.HentaiAtHomeClient.dieWithError(HentaiAtHomeClient.java:369)} Critical Error: Failed to get initial stat from server.

Indeed if I try to ping rpc.hentaiathome.net from this server I get no replies - however if I try to ping it from my current location (on a different IP), it works fine.

Edit: Well I just locked myself out of being able to remotely access the server, so I guess I'm not fixing this until I'm back from my holiday.

This post has been edited by Ver Greeneyes: Sep 30 2023, 02:58
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

 
post Sep 30 2023, 07:44
Post #387
uareader



Critter
*********
Group: Catgirl Camarilla
Posts: 5,593
Joined: 1-September 14
Level 500 (Ponyslayer)


Hitrate: 20.5 / min
Hathrate: 34.3 / day

It sure fell a lot after the recent change. I remember joking (but I could not find my post about it, must have not mentioned "h@h" thus not having keyword, or I just thought it a lot without posting) about getting hit more than once per second before.
I wonder if it will take as much time to recover, as it took time to start from zero and build up performance?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

 
post Sep 30 2023, 08:56
Post #388
Tenboro

Admin




QUOTE(uareader @ Sep 30 2023, 07:44) *
I wonder if it will take as much time to recover, as it took time to start from zero and build up performance?


Depends on your client's specs and location. If this was one of those clients in Europe with large-ish HDD and slow-ish speed, it'll go back up somewhat over time, but Europe is pretty oversaturated so it probably won't go back to where it was.
User is online!Profile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

 
post Oct 4 2023, 13:58
Post #389
工ロ魔人



Casual Poster
****
Group: Catgirl Camarilla
Posts: 339
Joined: 10-June 10
Level 499 (Dovahkiin)


Something strange with client 44663
Network issue on Sep 27 and it was temporarily limited to 80% (from 30000 KB/s to 24000)
And it is limited to 20000 in recent 3 hours

CODE


eth0  /  daily

          day        rx      |     tx      |    total    |   avg. rate
     ------------------------+-------------+-------------+---------------
     2023-09-25    66.64 GiB |    1.59 TiB |    1.66 TiB |  168.99 Mbit/s
     2023-09-26    58.35 GiB |    1.38 TiB |    1.43 TiB |  145.89 Mbit/s
     2023-09-27    69.14 GiB |    1.65 TiB |    1.72 TiB |  174.78 Mbit/s
     2023-09-28    90.58 GiB |    2.09 TiB |    2.18 TiB |  221.99 Mbit/s
     2023-09-29    90.24 GiB |    2.09 TiB |    2.18 TiB |  221.46 Mbit/s
     2023-09-30    91.96 GiB |    2.10 TiB |    2.19 TiB |  222.67 Mbit/s
     2023-10-01    92.83 GiB |    2.10 TiB |    2.19 TiB |  222.97 Mbit/s
     2023-10-02    95.58 GiB |    2.13 TiB |    2.22 TiB |  226.06 Mbit/s
     2023-10-03    94.32 GiB |    2.12 TiB |    2.22 TiB |  225.54 Mbit/s
     2023-10-04    45.75 GiB |    1.02 TiB |    1.06 TiB |  218.00 Mbit/s
     ------------------------+-------------+-------------+---------------
     estimated     92.13 GiB |    2.05 TiB |    2.14 TiB |


CODE


         hour        rx      |     tx      |    total    |   avg. rate
     ------------------------+-------------+-------------+---------------
     2023-10-03
         12:00      3.96 GiB |   90.00 GiB |   93.95 GiB |  224.18 Mbit/s
         13:00      4.03 GiB |   90.53 GiB |   94.56 GiB |  225.62 Mbit/s
         14:00      4.04 GiB |   91.14 GiB |   95.18 GiB |  227.11 Mbit/s
         15:00      4.17 GiB |   93.37 GiB |   97.55 GiB |  232.76 Mbit/s
         16:00      4.23 GiB |   94.71 GiB |   98.94 GiB |  236.08 Mbit/s
         17:00      4.14 GiB |   93.37 GiB |   97.51 GiB |  232.66 Mbit/s
         18:00      3.94 GiB |   90.95 GiB |   94.89 GiB |  226.42 Mbit/s
         19:00      3.72 GiB |   89.44 GiB |   93.16 GiB |  222.28 Mbit/s
         20:00      3.58 GiB |   88.24 GiB |   91.82 GiB |  219.09 Mbit/s
         21:00      3.51 GiB |   86.93 GiB |   90.44 GiB |  215.79 Mbit/s
         22:00      3.52 GiB |   88.34 GiB |   91.87 GiB |  219.20 Mbit/s
         23:00      3.83 GiB |   90.13 GiB |   93.96 GiB |  224.19 Mbit/s
     2023-10-04
         00:00      3.95 GiB |   90.76 GiB |   94.71 GiB |  225.98 Mbit/s
         01:00      3.85 GiB |   90.39 GiB |   94.24 GiB |  224.85 Mbit/s
         02:00      3.94 GiB |   90.81 GiB |   94.75 GiB |  226.08 Mbit/s
         03:00      3.88 GiB |   90.78 GiB |   94.67 GiB |  225.89 Mbit/s
         04:00      4.05 GiB |   90.33 GiB |   94.38 GiB |  225.19 Mbit/s
         05:00      4.05 GiB |   91.33 GiB |   95.38 GiB |  227.58 Mbit/s
         06:00      3.88 GiB |   90.34 GiB |   94.22 GiB |  224.83 Mbit/s
         07:00      3.69 GiB |   88.48 GiB |   92.17 GiB |  219.92 Mbit/s
         08:00      3.88 GiB |   90.43 GiB |   94.31 GiB |  225.03 Mbit/s
         09:00      3.65 GiB |   86.15 GiB |   89.79 GiB |  214.25 Mbit/s
         10:00      3.20 GiB |   73.97 GiB |   77.17 GiB |  184.13 Mbit/s
         11:00      2.05 GiB |   31.39 GiB |   33.44 GiB |  191.49 Mbit/s
     ------------------------+-------------+-------------+---------------
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

 
post Oct 4 2023, 14:11
Post #390
Tenboro

Admin




QUOTE(工ロ魔人 @ Oct 4 2023, 13:58) *
Something strange with client 44663
Network issue on Sep 27 and it was temporarily limited to 80% (from 30000 KB/s to 24000)
And it is limited to 20000 in recent 3 hours


There was a brief issue with a backend update that made speedtests a bit wonky, but this should be fixed by now. It may take a bit of time before the current speeds have fully corrected.
User is online!Profile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

 
post Oct 4 2023, 14:44
Post #391
hengnio



Newcomer
*
Group: Members
Posts: 22
Joined: 15-July 17
Level 216 (Destined)


I have client 45734, which is set to a max upload speed of 10000kb/s,
but I've noticed that it is only maxing out at 4194kb/s and the Hitrate has dropped dramatically.
This state has been going on for a week, is this normal?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

 
post Oct 4 2023, 19:57
Post #392
Tenboro

Admin




QUOTE(hengnio @ Oct 4 2023, 14:44) *
I have client 45734, which is set to a max upload speed of 10000kb/s,
but I've noticed that it is only maxing out at 4194kb/s and the Hitrate has dropped dramatically.
This state has been going on for a week, is this normal?


Looks like your client experienced some overloads while it was at the higher speed, so it dropped down somewhat. This currently starts lifting after ten days or so.

Though there will be some updates to this part of the system in the near future to prevent the limit from lingering this long just for one or two overloads.
User is online!Profile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

 
post Oct 5 2023, 12:01
Post #393
kamio11




*******
Group: Catgirl Camarilla
Posts: 1,359
Joined: 6-June 13
Level 500 (Ponyslayer)


Was the hathrate calculation changed? Mine has dropped significantly from when I last checked a day or two ago and doesn't match the wiki (which may now be outdated).
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

 
post Oct 5 2023, 13:11
Post #394
Tenboro

Admin




QUOTE(kamio11 @ Oct 5 2023, 12:01) *
Was the hathrate calculation changed? Mine has dropped significantly from when I last checked a day or two ago and doesn't match the wiki (which may now be outdated).


It hasn't changed, not intentionally anyway, but I've been messing a lot with the backend code recently so something might be broken. Which client, what are you getting, and what are you expecting it to be?

Edit: Actually there was one part about it that changed that I forgot about, it now applies the cap of 5 KB/s per range on the hath rate as well, since the variables it used to calculate the old cap don't exist anymore. If that explains it for you, then yes, it was intentional.
User is online!Profile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

 
post Oct 5 2023, 16:47
Post #395
kamio11




*******
Group: Catgirl Camarilla
Posts: 1,359
Joined: 6-June 13
Level 500 (Ponyslayer)


QUOTE(Tenboro @ Oct 5 2023, 11:11) *

It hasn't changed, not intentionally anyway, but I've been messing a lot with the backend code recently so something might be broken. Which client, what are you getting, and what are you expecting it to be?

Edit: Actually there was one part about it that changed that I forgot about, it now applies the cap of 5 KB/s per range on the hath rate as well, since the variables it used to calculate the old cap don't exist anymore. If that explains it for you, then yes, it was intentional.


I think that cap explains it, then. Across all my clients, my hath rate is down by about a factor of 3.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

 
post Oct 5 2023, 21:16
Post #396
snieder



Lurker
Group: Lurkers
Posts: 2
Joined: 3-April 10
Level 18 (Novice)


I seem to be having some issues with my client, but I'm not sure where to start debugging the issue.

Excerpt from the logs:

QUOTE

2023-10-05T19:06:03Z [debug] Current system time is Thu Oct 05 21:06:03 CEST 2023 (1696532763479)
2023-10-05T19:06:03Z [debug] Certificate expires on Fri Oct 20 12:12:25 CEST 2023 (1697796745000)
2023-10-05T19:06:03Z [debug] Memory total=32768kB free=25250kB max=16457728kB
2023-10-05T19:06:13Z [debug] Memory total=32768kB free=25250kB max=16457728kB
2023-10-05T19:06:19Z [debug] {6451/192.168.128.1} The connection was interrupted or closed by the remote host.
2023-10-05T19:06:19Z [debug] Remote host terminated the handshake
2023-10-05T19:06:20Z [debug] {6452/192.168.128.1} File is not in static ranges for fileindex=<fileindex> xres=1280 fileid=<fileid>-1280-1818-jpg
2023-10-05T19:06:20Z [debug] Response Written:
2023-10-05T19:06:20Z [debug] An error has occurred. (404)
2023-10-05T19:06:20Z [info] {6452/192.168.128.1} Code=404 Bytes=28 GET /h/<fileid>-1280-1818-jpg/keystamp=<keystamp>;fileindex=<fileindex>;xres=1280/00012.jpg HTTP/1.1
2023-10-05T19:06:20Z [info] {6452/192.168.128.1} Code=404 Bytes=28 Finished processing request in 0.00 seconds


I've removed the particular fileid etc. The error "The connection was interrupted or closed by the remote host." and "Remote host terminated the handshake" seems to indicate a remote issue, but I suspect it's on my end. Could this error occur due to faulty file permissions? Port should be properly forwarded and the stillalive tests succeed without issue. What I'm noticing is that whenever the client gets assigned a P1 static range, the quality and trust suddenly start tanking. The cache does seem to slowly fill up, but not at the expected rate.

The client runs in a customized Docker container, based on "amazoncorretto:21-alpine" with the "--disable-ip-origin-check" flag enabled.

Edit: Forgot to mention, but the error log doesn't contain any recent logs.
Edit 2: Recreated it with host networking and without the "--disable-ip-origin-check" flag, going to test if that makes a difference.

This post has been edited by snieder: Oct 5 2023, 21:30
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

 
post Oct 5 2023, 22:05
Post #397
Tenboro

Admin




QUOTE(snieder @ Oct 5 2023, 21:16) *
I seem to be having some issues with my client, but I'm not sure where to start debugging the issue.

I've removed the particular fileid etc. The error "The connection was interrupted or closed by the remote host." and "Remote host terminated the handshake" seems to indicate a remote issue, but I suspect it's on my end. Could this error occur due to faulty file permissions? Port should be properly forwarded and the stillalive tests succeed without issue. What I'm noticing is that whenever the client gets assigned a P1 static range, the quality and trust suddenly start tanking. The cache does seem to slowly fill up, but not at the expected rate.


Hm. Yeah, no, that's a problem with the backend. I had been tracking an issue with increased errors being flagged by the client monitor, and I believe I've found and fixed the problem now. Let me know if you're still seeing any problems, especially if you still get any of these errors:

CODE
2023-10-05T19:06:20Z [debug] {6452/192.168.128.1} File is not in static ranges for fileindex=<fileindex> xres=1280 fileid=<fileid>-1280-1818-jpg
User is online!Profile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

 
post Oct 5 2023, 22:08
Post #398
snieder



Lurker
Group: Lurkers
Posts: 2
Joined: 3-April 10
Level 18 (Novice)


QUOTE(Tenboro @ Oct 5 2023, 22:05) *

Hm. Yeah, no, that's a problem with the backend. I had been tracking an issue with increased errors being flagged by the client monitor, and I believe I found and fixed the problem now. Let me know if you're still seeing any problems, especially if you still get any of these errors:

CODE
2023-10-05T19:06:20Z [debug] {6452/192.168.128.1} File is not in static ranges for fileindex=<fileindex> xres=1280 fileid=<fileid>-1280-1818-jpg


All right, thank you for the quick reply! Will do. Though it might take a while as it tanked my trust to -100 and quality to about 2.3k (slowly recovering) (IMG:[invalid] style_emoticons/default/tongue.gif). I'll keep it running in host mode without the flag for now as well.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

 
post Oct 5 2023, 22:11
Post #399
nasu



さき★すかん
********
Group: Gold Star Club
Posts: 3,222
Joined: 13-June 16
Level 431 (Godslayer)


Is there a way to check if my client has been overloading? I stopped gaining higher priority ranges over the last few days and the "session files served" count (i.e. date [info] {<this number>/ip}...) seems like it reset in the last 30 mins or so. Are the two things related or am I capped out at this range count now?

This post has been edited by nasu: Oct 5 2023, 22:18
User is online!Profile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

 
post Oct 5 2023, 22:16
Post #400
Tenboro

Admin




QUOTE(snieder @ Oct 5 2023, 22:08) *
All right, thank you for the quick reply! Will do. Though it might take a while as it tanked my trust to -100 and quality to about 2.3k (slowly recovering) (IMG:[invalid] style_emoticons/default/tongue.gif). I'll keep it running in host mode without the flag for now as well.


Oh. Well, I reset the trust of your client, so it should be fine now.

QUOTE(nasu @ Oct 5 2023, 22:11) *
Is there a way to check if my client has been overloading? I stopped gaining ranges over the last few days and the "session files served" count (i.e. date [info] {<this number>/ip}...) seems like it reset in the last 30 mins or so. Are the two things related or am I capped out at this range count now?


There's no readout for overloads, no, but it hasn't been. Your range count is at 6000, which is indeed the cap.

The "session files served" counter resets if the internal HTTP server restarts due to a cert refresh, which happens every three months or so.
User is online!Profile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post


39 Pages V « < 18 19 20 21 22 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 


Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 7th June 2025 - 14:43