QUOTE(noahbody @ Aug 6 2011, 03:02)

[citation needed]
Really sir, you say citation needed to my point, and go on to fabricate things and use opinion as proof.
Right. So now I am to spend a few hours providing good examples, to which you'll reply with a three-word remark? No, thank you. There are good examples, but I'm spending enough time on this discussion as it is.
QUOTE(noahbody @ Aug 6 2011, 03:02)

Please enlighten me to a racial Japanese slur. Please do. Do they call African-Americans, NlGGERS? Do they call Mexicans, wetbacks? Jews, kikes? The worst they have is Gaijin, which literally translates to outside person; it has nowhere near the connotation wetback does.
You might be thinking of Japanese swearwords, which has nothing to do with this discussion. And even so, the worse they amount to is the English equivalent of "peepee" and "vagina".
As for the Native Americans, for the most part (exceptions exist), they saw no bad with the white man, and in most cases revered them, until the white man proved them wrong, by being total douches (read on the Mexican Indigenous culture for further info).
Let me remind you how the discussion about this started:
QUOTE(noahbody @ Aug 1 2011, 22:36)

This is one of those things I can't understand from today's society: When screamed out loud, Darn has the same connotation as Fuck. You're saying it with the same strength in either case, and you mean the same interjection, so how come in society one is more acceptable? A word just becomes unacceptable after it is deemed so by society, but in the heart of it, they're all just words. Scribbles on a page, or sound waves out of your mouth.
I'm almost sure that 90% of society doesn't understand the concept of a synonym.
Do you see any trace of information on racial slur in this remark? The discussion is all the time, and only, on swearwords. It never had anything to do with racial slur, and it still doesn't. Have you really not caught this, or is it just a strawman argument?