Is 5G dangerous? There's issues of physical safety from radiated energy. And then there is privacy concerns.
The answer depends if you ask the Fox that is guarding the chickens' health or the Farmer watching the Fox. Asking the chickens seems to get a lot of bird-brained answers. As for asking the Fox, China had started the Social Credit Score system to evaluate the trustworthiness of people in both social and political senses. It already has a Credit Score and Credit Report for looking at financial ratings of individuals. The Social Credit Scoring system will require inputs from many sources such as AI image recognition from public and private cameras, any device with GPS, the IoT (internet of things), forum posts, emails, where a person goes and how long he stays there, who he associates with, what he buys, how much time the person wastes each day on non-productive behaviors, and more.
[
en.wikipedia.org]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_data[
en.wikipedia.org]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_of_thingsSmarty Pants might say "I will use a scooter since cars have GPS that phone home and I will put my cellphone inside a Faraday Bag". China has random check points where the police will check everyone's smartphone. That's to insure the phone's security features were not hacked and that the official apps are properly installed and working. They plug something into your phone and it checks. If you had your phone inside a Faraday Bag, of course there would be no location data up to that checkpoint. If you're a tourist to western China, you may be acquainted already with the government app installed into your smartphone used in China.
[
www.rfa.org]
https://www.rfa.org/english/news/china/poli...2018111240.htmlThe Social Credit System uses the Chilling Effect, but also punishes those who refuse to snitch. It also allows for possible score improvement if the person volunteers with the government to do certain tasks. The articles didn't say what kinds of tasks, but I suppose it would be in-kind labor related to why the points were deducted in the first place or signing up to be part of the new variant of "50 cent army" on internet or if they can become a moderator of forum sites to see what IP addresses certain posters use or even ban certain users with plausible reasons.
[
www.theatlantic.com]
https://www.theatlantic.com/international/a...illance/552203/ [
www.wired.com]
https://www.wired.com/story/age-of-social-credit/ [
en.wikipedia.org]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_Credit_SystemThe official rollout of Social Credit System is in 2020. Eventually 2020, people will be required to have apps in phones to allow for more accurate scanning.
[
www.rfa.org]
https://www.rfa.org/english/news/china/poli...2018111240.htmlOne thing the government requires is backdoor access. Since Huawei is a chinese company, and it buys parts from chinese-owned suppliers, any of those can contain the mandated backdoors. The USA requires certain hardware to have backdoors too, although it is not known to what degree as terms of CALEA2 are secretive. Anyways, China's social credit system would require Huawei to support it. As a result, your data could be trawled or sniped by that hardware (and firmware). USA has similar requirements for involuntary data access
[
en.wikipedia.org]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communication...Enforcement_ActBig Data and IoT is annoying as is the Chilling Effect. When combined with all the public data out there, along with the dates and times implicated by the data, even the waking hours of a person are known. Some places use the Chilling Effect to get people to purchase "blocks" to prevent others from seeing the data. It's innovative. It's possibly hard to sell data to someone since they already know their own data. But what if a site suggested that the person's data would be partially visible in non-specific form? Would that person then purchase a subscription to block others from seeing that status and pay yet another premium to block the specific details itself? You can see that Chilling Effect by entering some names at MYLIFE.COM and don't use your name or your email address and don't buy anything. Clear your buffers since javascript can read your browser history and give it to them for more verification. And go there from a neutral page since if you go there from a webpage "I love Brony" they will know that. If you don't pay, you'll see interim messages similar to "searching for lawsuits filed against xxxxx" or "xxxxx may have sexual deviancy charges". True or not, those can be displayed boldly in red. Would a future spouse see that? Would an employer? So sites like these are annoyingly selling the Chilling Effect.
As to Huawei, when a government acquires all that Big Data, IoT, and has the backdoor in the backbone of the communication systems, it can be pretty powerful. They can set someone onto key people and then lean on them.
Now, for the other aspect of 5G used by anyone, remember it is a scalable system that allows future growth. That's why it has multiple bands it can use. Many of these are high energy bands such as microwave and higher. The molecules are heated and vibrate. So it's up to you to believe whether or not DNA has molecules or not or if apoptosis is reliable enough to alleviate 5G effects.
[
www.rfpage.com]
https://www.rfpage.com/what-are-5g-frequency-bands/[
www.rfsafe.com]
https://www.rfsafe.com/5g-network-uses-near...ontrol-systems/Because 5G has so many widely varying frequencies, it's possible that a corporation can right at this very instant say truthfully (like a lawyer) they are not using any dangerous frequencies. Of course, 5G is not full of users, so they can just stick to the lowest non-microwave frequencies for now. But if you asked them 5 years from now when the bands are more crowded, their answer would be different. So beware of lawyer speak answers couched in the current time frame. Answers in future time frames to the same question would be different.