[X] My Assistant

Having been circumcised all my life, I only go by what I see when I wake up to take a piss... well, that and American pornos often only star circumcised actors.

Plus, uncircumcised penises look like a sad Bull Mastiff.

I think they look like an elephant's trunk, but your comparison is better.

Extra flesh is just weird looking. I mean, seeing someone who has dropped a lot of weight without a shirt on should give you an idea of why foreskin is looked down upon. Plus, foreskin can cause health problems from lack of hygiene and lint.

It's a penis how it's supossed to be, so it's kind of stupid if you say it's weird. It's like saying normal breasts look weird in comparision to blow up fake breast implants

Just my opinion. I have nothing against circumsized penises. Love to all.

Actually, that's just another point where humanity has not evolved past, there is no longer a need for that extra part of the sheath as we are now wearing clothes and are not walking around the wilderness without some sort of cover. Just the same as earwax and facial hair.

Actually, that's just another point where humanity has not evolved past, there is no longer a need for that extra part of the sheath as we are now wearing clothes and are not walking around the wilderness without some sort of cover. Just the same as earwax and facial hair.

You will have a harder time reproducing by removing this little piece of flesh. True story bro.

[www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov] http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1497920...Pubmed_RVDocSum

This post has been edited by Scarlete: Oct 22 2009, 22:27

Like we need more foul humans on this beautiful planet, in any case, I will see into this and make note:

Adult circumcision appeared to have resulted in weakened erectile confidence in 33 cases(P = 0.04)

,

This is psychological and not physical, ergo, no real effect upon actual reproduction. This is to say that, perhaps they were so used to the way it looked beforehand that now it looks strange. Let me give you an example. I had cut part of my finger off a few years ago, and, yes, it looked strange and I thought I was fucked up because of it, however, now I am not nearly as conscious as I was a few years ago, due to seeing it regularly. The results of this test were, from what I can tell, taken after a relatively short time, so, it is almost assured that, given human intolerance of change, some would be mentally affected by circumcision.

difficult insertion in 41 cases(P = 0.03),

This is hardly a case, also, because most men have a hard time inserting the penis into the vagina. Since men are typically more mentally stimulated by visual instruction rather than hands on learning, it is not a surprise that they would be having difficulty with insertion, not to mention the fact that the shape of the penis has changed to something that they are not used to. Again, the effects of hasty result taking and no later testing and results with the same individuals.

prolonged intercourse in 31 cases(P = 0.04)

This is hardly an issue, as the length of sex is not proven to raise or reduce sperm count.

and improved satisfaction in 34 cases(P = 0.04).

Again, not an issue, as the amount of satisfaction does not affect sperm count.

foreskin can cause health problems from lack of hygiene and lint.

Only if you're disgusting and can't practice such things as proper hygiene, yes. Other then that, it's better overall to have kept your foreskin. Most of the time foreskin is removed under religious circumstances. Both Judaism and Christianity are known for removing the prepuce for religious reason. All in all, people seem do fine with or without, so it's not really an issue for one or the other.

You will have a harder time reproducing by removing this little piece of flesh. True story bro.

[www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov] http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1497920...Pubmed_RVDocSum

I didn't know a flap of skin similar to that of the inner lip of your mouth was capable of hindering reproduction. You know, seeing as all the sperm, semen and nerve ending are located in there, right? You know being the expert of penises that you are what with not having one and all.

This post has been edited by Rob Itagaki: Oct 22 2009, 22:50

I don't like Boggyb that much after his faggot thread and with all the penises and stuff.

They weren't his penises.

[. . .]it's better overall to have kept your foreskin.

This seems more opinion than fact.

Rad, I was talking about the erectile dysfunction part. Obviously.

Eighteen patients suffered from mild erectile dysfunction before circumcision, and 28 suffered from mild or moderate erectile dysfunction after circumcision(P = 0.001)

Don't filter information out of my awesome article. That p value is also pretty impressive.

@ Rob: Read the article please

This post has been edited by Scarlete: Oct 22 2009, 22:57

You will have a harder time reproducing by removing this little piece of flesh. True story bro.

[www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov] http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1497920...Pubmed_RVDocSum

Improper adjustment timeframe. Data irrelevant.

Improper adjustment timeframe. Data irrelevant.

Precisely this, I left that random fact out as that, also, is irrelevant. It ties into the psychological part of the physical change that a person isn't used to. There was no timeframe adjustment for any of those "facts", ergo, they should be thrown out until more testing is done to prove these things, as they currently stand as little more than a hypothesis.

This post has been edited by radixius: Oct 22 2009, 23:00

Fine Rad, your penis is just fine and cutting your penis up is awesome

This post has been edited by Scarlete: Oct 22 2009, 23:03

Don't change the subject dear

I didn't change the subject, I just ended the discussion about circumsized penises and their potential negative effects? I mean, studies in medical journals are bullshit anyways.

This post has been edited by Scarlete: Oct 22 2009, 23:06

(IMG:[media.deadgod.net] http://media.deadgod.net/albums/blog/forums/DeathCharms/fry-see-what-you-did-there-scaled.jpg)

I didn't change the subject, I just ended the discussion about circumsized penises and their potential negative effects? I mean, studies in medical journals are bullshit anyways.

Lots of them are, actually.
In this case, it seems like people forgot to take into consideration the psychological effects of having a procedure happen. If you compared these findings with a similar data subset of people that have been circumcised their entire life vs uncircumcised, the results might be quite different.

Lots of them are, actually.
In this case, it seems like people forgot to take into consideration the psychological effects of having a procedure happen. If you compared these findings with a similar data subset of people that have been circumcised their entire life vs uncircumcised, the results might be quite different.

Studies in medical journals always have to be interpreted with caution and their results are always hypothesis for other future studies, but a researcher has to go through a lot of shit to get approval and to actually get published into a journal. I don't think they can just pull out some random study out of their asses and make a buck. Though it is a questionaire study, so it doesn't has to go through all the ethical aspects.

I agree with your point that adding this information as a control would've made this study a lot better. Then again, I really don't care about this study at all and I believe that the worst a circumcision does is make the penis less sensitive.

This post has been edited by Scarlete: Oct 22 2009, 23:20