[X] My Assistant

Tenboro: Neither printing nor scanning are lossless, so no. The finished product you can release in a more handy resolution, sure, but if the scan is to be used for editing, it's a different matter.

You won't end up with lossless do matter how high up you go. And raw, unrefined scans probably aren't the best match for galleries in the first place. Those are more for editors.

You won't end up with lossless do matter how high up you go. And raw, unrefined scans probably aren't the best match for galleries in the first place. Those are more for editors.

Yes and yes. I was arguing purely from an editor's point of view here.

Someone is being sarcastic about 600 DPI and it devolves into a serious discussion about a fictional scenario, great (IMG:[invalid] style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)

[sadpanda.us] http://sadpanda.us/images/1461525-PWZWORE.jpg

I was serious, actually.

Edit: Granted, if that should ever be implemented, we'd probably need a way for the scanner to upload a second resized version for normal readers to download. 1gb raws for reading are a bit much I guess.

This post has been edited by Thot: Mar 11 2013, 16:09

Yay for visible dithering.

It won't happen. Galleries with many large files is already a problem for the archivers, so if anything the max number of files would be decreased.

Besides, TIF is a pretty shitty image format when it comes to compression. If you want optimal lossless, PNG is nearly always the way to go.

[sadpanda.us] http://sadpanda.us/images/1461525-PWZWORE.jpg

People are here for fapping, not spotting dust with amazing accuracy. (IMG:[invalid] style_emoticons/default/laugh.gif)

People are here for fapping, not spotting dust with amazing accuracy. (IMG:[invalid] style_emoticons/default/laugh.gif)

[stardustathome.ssl.berkeley.edu] There are other sites for that.

Hey hopefully can get some help with this for quite some time now I have been getting a Error 503 but not matter what I use be it my laptop, PS3, or Desktop it continues to get the error. the only area I can get into is the forums of course and https://e-hentai.org/home.php but when I try to go to the galleries the Error 503 pops up any help would be greatly appreciated. Really baffled to what is causing the issue when its effecting other things besides just my computer.

Hey hopefully can get some help with this for quite some time now I have been getting a Error 503 but not matter what I use be it my laptop, PS3, or Desktop it continues to get the error. the only area I can get into is the forums of course and https://e-hentai.org/home.php but when I try to go to the galleries the Error 503 pops up any help would be greatly appreciated. Really baffled to what is causing the issue when its effecting other things besides just my computer.

A very similar issue was discussed here: https://forums.e-hentai.org/index.php?showt...765&st=880#

Hello there,

I would like to suggestion a possibility to:

Filter galleries based on number of images

I would like that too

edit: but for my case, i want to find completed/long mangas

I also second the request for searching by number of images.

Hi,

I'd like to second (or third, or fourth) a filtering by number of images. I'm pretty irritated of opening galleries containing only a handful of pictures...

Am I right in saying we still don't have this feature?
I'm sure everyone would appreciate this feature Tenboro, please sir, may we have it?

This post has been edited by Zip: Mar 17 2013, 00:39

Any chance you could change displaying priorities for the Tag Flagging Perk? Currently, if I have a parent tag in one group and a child tag in another group, it will always use the icon from the group the parent tag is in, due to its lower tag ID (or however that is selected).
Could you change this, so it always prefers the icon of the first group over the icon of the second, and the second over the third, if tags from both are present in a gallery? thx

Also having this system on the "popular right now" pane would be nice.

This post has been edited by r3pt1le: Mar 24 2013, 21:05

Can we get increase of tag count in Tag Flagging? It's not enough for me.
Please.

Any way to filter Guro content? There have been a bunch of uncensored covers the past couple days...

Get Tag Flagging and hide galleries with the guro tag

Have you ever thought of reforming the image sets? It would be much more functional if images were uploaded and tagged individually. Then a search of tags would create the image sets for the user. This would eliminate thousands (probably more) of duplicate images that get uploaded to multiple sets. It would make it much easier to zero in on what the user is looking for content wise. The site has a great tagging system and a good community to keep it accurate and relevant but it's being used poorly on images.

It would be much more functional if images were uploaded and tagged individually.

[danbooru.donmai.us] Hi, you appear to want to be at a different website.

This would eliminate thousands (probably more) of duplicate images that get uploaded to multiple sets.

Not a shot, dupe uploaders are just lazy/idiots. Less than 15 minutes ago someone uploaded a duplicate of a perfectly named and tagged manga. Avoiding dupes is already easy by searching for file hashes, not tags.

[danbooru.donmai.us] Hi, you appear to want to be at a different website.
Not a shot, dupe uploaders are just lazy/idiots. Less than 15 minutes ago someone uploaded a duplicate of a perfectly named and tagged manga. Avoiding dupes is already easy by searching for file hashes, not tags.

Not familiar with Danbooru...anyway I don't see why that would mean e-hentai couldn't have a better image section. It has the basic infrastructure to do it already. I mean I could be wrong and it could be a lot more work then I suspect and that would be a valid reason not too since the focus here isn't images so much as doujins and manga.

Dupes with images isn't the same as with manga. People take care of dupes in the other sections swiftly. In the image section you can have a gallery with 20 pictures of a character and another with 20 pictures of the same character and 10 images in both are the same but since they both have original pictures the dupes stay in both. And then you have other galleries containing those same images that are based on fetishes and not the character.

...it could be a lot more work then I suspect...

I don't know if what you are suspecting is that we would require to completely re-tag every single gallery we have (atm 236,878).
But if it's indeed what you are suspecting, you probably know it would take years. and years of work, during which it would be total chaos.

To top it off we would require a completely new tagging system to weight how relevant a tag is in a gallery, as well as a way to bind a image to a tag.

The changes you are suggesting is something that is implemented on a ground level during the actual site construction, not 7 (or is it 8?) years in...

This post has been edited by binglo: Mar 25 2013, 23:36

I don't see retagging as an issue honestly. Large community, lots of people to help. I can see a few options, take all the images in a gallery and apply the gallery tags to every image then let the users vote up and down the correct tags until it's fixed. Or wipe it clean and comb through it one at a time, either way there should be enough users to get it done. When it's done it's done and you have a much nicer system as a result.

Again I don't know about the technical programming side of things but the site already has tags and galleries it doesn't seem like a stretch to have every image count as a gallery with tags and everything and tack on a system to display all galleries with a tag as thumbnails. (I think it can already do this anyway).

The gallery system appears to already have everything it needs to do this and it creates a much better interface for users.

I don't see retagging as an issue honestly. Large community, lots of people to help. I can see a few options, take all the images in a gallery and apply the gallery tags to every image then let the users vote up and down the correct tags until it's fixed. Or wipe it clean and comb through it one at a time, either way there should be enough users to get it done. When it's done it's done and you have a much nicer system as a result.

You should familiarize yourself with how tagging is done on this site before making such claims. The amount of users that are systematically tagging can be counted on your fingers and toes. Loads of people only tag what they enjoy, and even more people only add one tagg here and there.

A tag is either visible, or it ain't. There is no in-between. So no, users voting up and down would do nothing to weighting a tag.

I'll say it again: this is not something you change this far in.

Final nail in the coffin: loads of suggestion that would have been light-years easier to implement has been promptly ignored by the site owner.

This post has been edited by binglo: Mar 26 2013, 01:00