 |
 |
 |
E-Hentai Galleries feature requests, centralized place to discuss improvements to the galleries |
|
Feb 20 2013, 22:11
|
Tenboro

|
503 means that you're either trying to go past the allowed 4 simultaneous download threads, or you have exhausted your allowed download attempts.
|
|
|
Feb 21 2013, 06:30
|
Archangel Tirael
Lurker
Group: Recruits
Posts: 7
Joined: 6-May 12

|
Most of all, I ran out of the number of times due to a bad connection, for downloading files in a single thread, but I can not download a file in a different way, without losing the connection. Now do not even know what to do, as time goes on... Maybe site too strict with the quality of my connection and always closes the connection, and a download manager tries to continue the download, while spending all attempts and get after it 503?
|
|
|
Feb 21 2013, 09:17
|
HotC
Lurker
Group: Recruits
Posts: 4
Joined: 13-November 09

|
I've wanted to solicit suggestions for recommended galleries based on what I like, but the best way I know to show what I like is to list my favorites, which is not feasible for a list of 40-something favorited galleries like I have. I wish I could just link people to my list, a la MyAnimeList, to make that easier.
|
|
|
Feb 23 2013, 09:47
|
Archangel Tirael
Lurker
Group: Recruits
Posts: 7
Joined: 6-May 12

|
Awesome... Now I get blank page when I try download archine (I not download it yet). After refresh I got 503 error page. So now I am not that I can not continue downloading, now I can not even start it! How download? Does anyone still able to help me? ;-;
|
|
|
Mar 2 2013, 12:26
|
ctxl
Group: Members
Posts: 425
Joined: 20-May 12

|
I would love to see what galleries I've personally rated a specific number of stars.
★☆☆☆☆ ★★☆☆☆ ★★★☆☆ ★★★★☆ ★★★★★
It'd be even better if it worked on the favorites page, too.
Speaking of which... nega-favorites? If it's in an specified favorites category, hide said gallery from search results.
Great for hiding stuff I never ever ever ever want to see again. And even better for burning up hath (with the More Favorites perks).
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Mar 2 2013, 12:41
|
pocky00
Group: Catgirl Camarilla
Posts: 1,257
Joined: 20-September 09

|
QUOTE(ctxl @ Mar 2 2013, 13:26)  I would love to see what galleries I've personally rated a specific number of stars.
★☆☆☆☆ ★★☆☆☆ ★★★☆☆ ★★★★☆ ★★★★★
It'd be even better if it worked on the favorites page, too.
Speaking of which... nega-favorites? If it's in an specified favorites category, hide said gallery from search results.
Great for hiding stuff I never ever ever ever want to see again. And even better for burning up hath (with the More Favorites perks).
+1
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Mar 6 2013, 07:18
|
PeopleDon'tDanceNoMore
Group: Members
Posts: 2,523
Joined: 29-February 08

|
A "low presence" class of tags could be quite useful. These tags wouldn't be included in normal search results, but they'd still be entirely voteable in either direction. I imagine that select users would be able to convert a given tag on a gallery to a "low presence" tag. (I would also suggest some sort of voting, but that would probably be pretty messy.) A normal presence tag "x" and a low presence tag "x" could not exist together in the same gallery.
There are some tags that get a lot of "abuse" (tagged for the slightest presence) which could benefit from this, so that instead of frequently having to rely on several people to vote it away (and then mixing it up with even completely erroneous tags in a down-voted tags search), a single user could just convert it to a "low presence" tag, thereby still accomplishing the goal of keeping it out of normal search results while also creating a curated set of low presence content for users to search.
I don't know how difficult implementing such a thing might be, but it'd definitely be useful.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Mar 6 2013, 13:16
|
Thot
Group: Gold Star Club
Posts: 1,637
Joined: 15-April 08

|
QUOTE(PeopleDon'tDanceNoMore @ Mar 6 2013, 06:18)  I don't know how difficult implementing such a thing might be, but it'd definitely be useful.
Depending on how exactly tags are implemented here, as easy as adding another column to the respective table. That would inherently already imply that only one version of the tag could be on any given gallery; either it has low_presence=1 or it doesn't. So probably fairly easy to implement, the question would be what it'd do to the caching. And I agree that it would be very useful in various ways. This post has been edited by Thot: Mar 6 2013, 13:29
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Mar 7 2013, 17:33
|
Manian
Group: Members
Posts: 277
Joined: 22-March 12

|
QUOTE(ctxl @ Mar 2 2013, 17:26) 
Speaking of which... nega-favorites? If it's in an specified favorites category, hide said gallery from search results.
Great for hiding stuff I never ever ever ever want to see again. And even better for burning up hath (with the More Favorites perks).
I like that idea can I have option that enable-invisbility for specific gallery or gallery with specific tag. I have been traps many time with futanari and other that is not my fetish. (IMG:[ invalid] style_emoticons/default/cry.gif)
|
|
|
Mar 7 2013, 18:28
|
Maximum_Joe
Group: Gold Star Club
Posts: 24,074
Joined: 17-April 11

|
-futanari
There, was that so hard?
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Mar 7 2013, 21:52
|
ctxl
Group: Members
Posts: 425
Joined: 20-May 12

|
I was thinking more of hiding specific (inferior) translations/editing/tanks/whatever. Or censored galleries, when there's an uncensored version available. Or one particular work from an artist that I don't like.
Figured it shouldn't be too difficult to implement since favorites categories already show up while searching in list view.
Categories to be hidden could just have their names be prefixed with "hide:". e.g, "hide:ponies"
The only thing stopping me from creating a script that arbitrarily hides a certain category is management.
I'd have to choose between 1) slapping everything in a single category to hide (and add notes to every single one, to remember why I hid a particular gallery) or 2) allocate multiple categories to organize them (thus reducing the number of actual favorites categories I can use)
tl;dr: having more favorites categories is fine too
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Mar 8 2013, 06:48
|
kurumileaf
Lurker
Group: Recruits
Posts: 5
Joined: 26-May 11

|
Hello everyone for quite some time now I have been getting a Error 503 but not matter what I use be it my laptop, PS3, or Desktop it continues to get the error. the only area I can get into is the forums of course and https://e-hentai.org/home.php but when I try to go to the galleries the Error 503 pops up any help would be greatly appreciated. (IMG:[ invalid] style_emoticons/default/anime_cry.gif)
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Mar 10 2013, 02:12
|
lightshader
Group: Gold Star Club
Posts: 1,350
Joined: 29-August 09

|
How about some way to search galleries posted by a certain member? Let's take heran1234 for example - using "search uploader name" option, I can pull up list of 3,629 galleries he's uploaded, but there's no way to filter further than that. I can't search for only Idolm@ster doujins he's uploaded. Including the tag with the uploader name will come up empty regardless of whether "search uploader name" option is enabled or not.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Mar 10 2013, 02:21
|
sigo8
Group: Gold Star Club
Posts: 3,597
Joined: 9-November 11

|
QUOTE(lightshader @ Mar 9 2013, 16:12)  How about some way to search galleries posted by a certain member? Let's take heran1234 for example - using "search uploader name" option, I can pull up list of 3,629 galleries he's uploaded, but there's no way to filter further than that. I can't search for only Idolm@ster doujins he's uploaded. Including the tag with the uploader name will come up empty regardless of whether "search uploader name" option is enabled or not.
One idea I had, but never bothered bringing up was making a pseudo-namespace for users for searching. Using your example the search would be CODE "uploader:heran1234" "p:the idolmaster"
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Mar 10 2013, 15:35
|
pocky00
Group: Catgirl Camarilla
Posts: 1,257
Joined: 20-September 09

|
Wouldn't mind seeing some limits to uploading being lifted or increased a bit. More specifically number of images per gallery and file size of an image.
Lots of games have more than 2000 images nowadays (and I'm not counting character images or stuff like that) and I'm guessing the limit was there for limiting absurdity abuse, but honestly I don't think it's a problem anymore.
Regarding the size of images, on some occassions the images that one harvests from digital doujins and mangas are often very large, sometimes the title pages can surpass 10MB and it kinda sucks when you have to tamper with an original release from the artist (to get it below 10MB) and it can also fuck up the bureacracy of the rules of expunging and replacing. Also, a few more MB to the limit would help a lot when making GIFs as they tend to land around 10 MB, often slightly over or slightly under. I understand well that there's a good reason for the limit, that it can get annoying to load files over 10MB, but I think the data-transfering over the net is getting faster and faster every day, even the site has recieved a lot of tune-ups since the limits and rules were made.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Mar 10 2013, 18:00
|
Thot
Group: Gold Star Club
Posts: 1,637
Joined: 15-April 08

|
~130mb/image limit please. That would allow for the uploading of raw 600dpi scans even in color.
|
|
|
Mar 10 2013, 18:08
|
Maximum_Joe
Group: Gold Star Club
Posts: 24,074
Joined: 17-April 11

|
600dpi is very excessive for scans. Hell, even glossy prints and the like tend to stick with 300.
|
|
|
Mar 10 2013, 18:52
|
Tenboro

|
If you scan at higher resolution than the print DPI, you're doing it wrong.
|
|
|
Mar 11 2013, 06:58
|
HTTP/308
Group: Catgirl Camarilla
Posts: 1,087
Joined: 8-April 10

|
Scans should be post-processed before used as digital images. Hell if someone is trying to upload 600dpi scans, he will definitely screw up color at the same time.
This post has been edited by HTTP/308: Mar 11 2013, 06:59
|
|
|
Mar 11 2013, 15:44
|
Thot
Group: Gold Star Club
Posts: 1,637
Joined: 15-April 08

|
QUOTE(Maximum_Joe @ Mar 10 2013, 17:08)  600dpi is very excessive for scans. Hell, even glossy prints and the like tend to stick with 300.
Try descreening with 300dpi. Yeah, doesn't work too well. Tenboro: Neither printing nor scanning are lossless, so no. The finished product you can release in a more handy resolution, sure, but if the scan is to be used for editing, it's a different matter. HTTP/308: Scans should be left untouched. Especially considering how many scanners needlessly overlevel, crop too much, export to jpg and commit other atrocities.
|
|
|
2 User(s) are reading this topic (2 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
|
 |
 |
 |
|