[X] My Assistant

A way to conditionally (based on the presence of another tag) associate one tag with another.

Better version: [danbooru.donmai.us] http://danbooru.donmai.us/tag_implication

Better version: [danbooru.donmai.us] http://danbooru.donmai.us/tag_implication

That's just "if user tags A, tag B also". This is, "if user tags A and B is already tagged, then tag C instead of A".

Can you fix (or enhance ?) the tag flagging perk so that it can accept tags with a namespace please ?

For instance, there exist 2 "crossdressing" tags belonging to 2 different NS: misc and male. The first NS concerns female crossdressers while the 2nd concerns male ones (in theory at least). Adding the "male:crossdressing" tag to the tag flagging perk doesn't work, and that tag is removed from the perk list after the user clicks the "Apply" button. Adding the "crossdressing" tag to the perk list works, but the perk only triggers on galleries with the "misc:crossdressing" tag then.

The only way to add the "male:crossdressing" tag to the perk list is to fool the system by specifying a slave tag of "male:crossdressing" that belongs to the misc NS (like "trap"), but it's counter intuitive and forces the user to think about modifying his perk lists every time it changes his settings, even if what he changes has nothing to do with that perk (because all slave tags are replaced by their master tags in the flag tagging perk lists, which is "crossdressing" here, and means "male:crossdressing" in the database, but will mean "misc:crossdressing" if the user click the "Apply" button).

This post has been edited by Hairs Fan: Jan 21 2013, 06:36

That's just "if user tags A, tag B also". This is, "if user tags A and B is already tagged, then tag C instead of A".

Except we have galleries where there are multiple parodies. So if you have a doujin with both card captor sakura and naruto, how's it going to work? Not very well unless both parts are based around each series' sakura.

I'm well aware. Read my original post about it more closely...

Perhaps it would only work if there were one series tagged.

Perhaps I didn't say "only one", but that is what I meant.

If that's not strictly how it works, though, then if there's multiple rule matches, probably none should activate. (The other option being they could all activate and someone will just have to figure out which ones aren't present. Not really much better or worse than just having "sakura" tagged, really (better insofar as cleanup effort required, worse insofar as searching).)

I have two suggestions:

1. A tag glossary, where you can look up the definition of a tag. I often see the same tag used in different ways.
2. A related galleries section, where related galleries (different language versions, sequels/prequels/spin-offs) are shown. This could be handled similar to the tag system, I think. And they could be displayed either with thumbnails or just the titles, in case thumbnails take up too much space.
   I have seen the comment section occasionally being used like this.

Edit:
@PeopleDon'tDanceNoMore
Thanks. I looked around an did a quick Google search, but didn't find the glossary, and I never noticed the "Show Tag Definition". Sorry.

This post has been edited by Chilla4000: Jan 21 2013, 22:39

A tag glossary, where you can look up the definition of a tag. I often see the same tag used in different ways.

http://ehwiki.org/wiki/Category:Tag

Or, just click on any tag in a gallery, and then click "Show Tag Definition" (which should show up in the same line as "Vote Up"/"Vote Down"). Some tags may not have a definition, but those should mostly be names (for a character/series/artist), or unapproved tags.

A direct link to the normal full-page view on System galleries in case of browsing issues... It's solid white but disabling JS doesn't trigger fallback to compatible links.

Hello, I've been around for almost 3 years (however not as long as some of the more dedicated), lurking about, so I doubt that my post will hold any sway given my post count.

I have started noticing that there is an ever increasing occurrence in which expunged or to-be-deleted galleries have broken links in their expunge list (I found the numbers already in the double-digits when searching for elements I am interested in).

Of course, this may be caused when the uploader deletes his/her gallery.
There is also the very real possibility that both galleries are expunged at the same time resulting in the deletion of one.

As such, this prevents tagging for such galleries as most users often glance over any expunged galleries which results in incompletely-tagged galleries.

There seems to be a bit of frustration among users due to this. Those vocal enough to voice their concerns can be found in the still-existing expunged gallery comments (however some are hidden due to a higher power person voting them down).

Perhaps this may be presumptuous of me but there is a potential concern of expunge abuse to remove legitimate galleries in a manner similar to tagging abuse.

So the feature I am proposing/requesting is perhaps a button to notify/mark certain expunged galleries for future retrieval in cases where the links in the expunge list are completely dead and/or broken.

Of course, this should apply to legitimate galleries rather than ones that were expunged or deleted for good reason as specified in the upload conditions.

I always turn everything off except for Doujinshi/Manga/Artist CG/Game CG so I do not know of the current status in the other categories. I've also read the Guidelines on the wiki and am familiar with prohibited content.

Thank you for your time.

Hello, I've been around for almost 3 years (however not as long as some of the more dedicated), lurking about, so I doubt that my post will hold any sway given my post count.

I have started noticing that there is an ever increasing occurrence in which expunged or to-be-deleted galleries have broken links in their expunge list (I found the numbers already in the double-digits when searching for elements I am interested in).

Of course, this may be caused when the uploader deletes his/her gallery.
There is also the very real possibility that both galleries are expunged at the same time resulting in the deletion of one.

As such, this prevents tagging for such galleries as most users often glance over any expunged galleries which results in incompletely-tagged galleries.

There seems to be a bit of frustration among users due to this. Those vocal enough to voice their concerns can be found in the still-existing expunged gallery comments (however some are hidden due to a higher power person voting them down).

Perhaps this may be presumptuous of me but there is a potential concern of expunge abuse to remove legitimate galleries in a manner similar to tagging abuse.

So the feature I am proposing/requesting is perhaps a button to notify/mark certain expunged galleries for future retrieval in cases where the links in the expunge list are completely dead and/or broken.

Of course, this should apply to legitimate galleries rather than ones that were expunged or deleted for good reason as specified in the upload conditions.

I always turn everything off except for Doujinshi/Manga/Artist CG/Game CG so I do not know of the current status in the other categories. I've also read the Guidelines on the wiki and am familiar with prohibited content.

Thank you for your time.

Well it's hard to explain, but if a gallery is being expunged as "Already Uploaded" and the link to the already uploaded gallery is pining for the fjords, then it means that the gallery has content that makes it pine for the fjords.
So your feature/suggestion isn't needed since there's almost to none "expunge abuse". If you should see any "expunge abuse" though, then you can write it here: https://forums.e-hentai.org/index.php?showtopic=28293

In my opinion, the most important features the website lacks are word filters (I'd filter Yaoi, futanari which are things I don't like, for example).

Also, a recommended gallery feature, in which the system would browse the tags in your favourite galleries, and give you ideas of galleries you might like.

In my opinion, the most important features the website lacks are word filters (I'd filter Yaoi, futanari which are things I don't like, for example).

Tag flagging is pretty close.

Tag flagging is pretty close.

So worth the Hath if you can run H@H.

Tag flagging is pretty close.

Let tag flagging support namespaced tags.

Some suggestions:
1. A new category for novels and artbooks, independent from "manga". An increasing work of the novels or artbooks are being scanned.

2. Remove the "group" tag namespace in manga category, replaced by "publisher". Those work are definitely not under their own group or circle's name but the publisher's. Only the dojin/cg category needs the group namespace. That is, all the group tags in a manga release is incorrect and should be taken off.

3. Automatic gallery renaming, based on EHwiki and the general name algorithm, that requires some change on upload pages, make some new columns to fill in the titles, circle/group/publisher and the artist's name, conventions, parodies, etc. if these info are given by the uploader, the proper title is automatically generated. If the uploader leave those blank, we can still use the old way to rename it by voting.

4. Could it be a "series" namespace, for a serial of works, instead of using "parodies"

This post has been edited by Lord of Evil: Jan 25 2013, 05:59

A new category for novels and artbooks, independent from "manga". An increasing work of the novels or artbooks are being scanned.

What's wrong with using the tags?

Remove the "group" tag namespace in manga category

There are times when the circle is valid to tag for Manga so no.

Those work are definitely not under their own group or circle's name but the publisher's.

Nobody gives a shit about publishers, they have 0 impact on the content. It doesn't help anyone except maybe expungers.

Automatic gallery renaming, based on EHwiki and the general name algorithm, that requires some change on upload pages, make some new columns to fill in the titles, circle/group/publisher and the artist's name, conventions, parodies, etc. if these info are given by the uploader, the proper title is automatically generated.

It's rare for an uploader to know those things and not know how to name a gallery. They might get some formatting wrong but that's relatively minor.

Could it be a "series" namespace, for a serial of works, instead of using "parodies"

"Parody" is much more accurate.

What's wrong with using the tags?
There are times when the circle is valid to tag for Manga so no.
Nobody gives a shit about publishers, they have 0 impact on the content. It doesn't help anyone except maybe expungers.
It's rare for an uploader to know those things and not know how to name a gallery. They might get some formatting wrong but that's relatively minor.
"Parody" is much more accurate.

er, well, what I mean is the artist might be associated with more than one circles, and when they release the non-dojin mangas they usually don't use the circles at all.

Besides, using parody tag to parodise itslef for the serial works is weird, it works but it is weird.

btw, not able to add new pages to the EHwiki, is it require some validation process or just the rank/usergroup thing?

This post has been edited by Lord of Evil: Jan 25 2013, 06:41

what I mean is the artist might be associated with more than one circles

We're making wiki pages to document when this happens.

Besides, using parody tag to parodise itslef for the serial works is weird, it works but it is weird.

It's very rare for the original work to be uploaded here since most are prohibited.

btw, not able to add new pages to the EHwiki, is it require some validation process or just the rank/usergroup thing?

What page do you want to make?

Besides, using parody tag to parodise itslef for the serial works is weird, it works but it is weird.

Perhaps you could give an example of what you mean, just to be sure. Joe seems to think he understands, but I'm a bit unsure about what you're saying here...

Perhaps you could give an example of what you mean, just to be sure. Joe seems to think he understands, but I'm a bit unsure about what you're saying here...

We have the originals of some series here (mostly VNs) as opposed to works based on them. He's saying it's weird to call something a parody for those.