[X] My Assistant

[dev.opera.com] Make your site shine in Speed Dial – something to consider, perhaps? (IMG:[invalid] style_emoticons/default/wink.gif)

It would be nice if bounties where searchable, by name or uploader. I heard there was a specific bounty by specific uploader, but I still had to click and look through several bounty pages to find it.

Also, Top Ten bounties are nice, but can we have a Top 25 as well?

And a historical Top Ten highest bounties ever could be fun.

We need to put a limit on the number of galleries one user can publish in a short period of time. 108 galleries in forty minutes, if I've counted correctly. This is crazy.

This post has been edited by 3d0xp0xy: Apr 15 2011, 20:40

We need to put a limit on the number of galleries one user can publish in a short period of time. 108 galleries in forty minutes, if I've counted correctly. This is crazy.

You might have a point there...

You might have a point there...

Well, they are GOOD galleries - new dojins, not some crappy imagesets. A limit could be put on imagesets, in fact I'd support some serious limits there in general, but I see no reason why somebody should be prevented from uploading 100+ good quality dojin/manga galleries if they have the find.

Well, they are GOOD galleries - new dojins, not some crappy imagesets. A limit could be put on imagesets, in fact I'd support some serious limits there in general, but I see no reason why somebody should be prevented from uploading 100+ good quality dojin/manga galleries if they have the find.

I think we should consider the other uploaders here; they got their galleries pushed five pages back. I don't believe the galleries begbeg published were in danger of being posted by someone else, so they could have spread it out over a few days, at least. Personally, I don't post more than four at time.

You also need to remember that the people checking re-up and doing tags only have so much time. 100+ galleries can easily take a couple of hours to do. This means that a lot of other galleries may be missed.

Only once have I ever uploaded more than five galleries at once and that was because I was dumping image sets due to computer problems.

You also need to remember that the people checking re-up and doing tags only have so much time. 100+ galleries can easily take a couple of hours to do. This means that a lot of other galleries may be missed.

Shouldn't that be secondary to getting new content here as fast as possible?
I see no problem with what begbeg did.

Shouldn't that be secondary to getting new content here as fast as possible?
I see no problem with what begbeg did.

Agreed. If he was spamming trash/dupes, we would ban him. If he is adding good content, he should be commended. Seeing suddenly three+ pages of new, non-dupe dojins, is to me like ehentai XMAS come early (IMG:[invalid] style_emoticons/default/smile.gif) Vigi should/will catch up, and other uploaders should be motivated to duplicate him (IMG:[invalid] style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif) Not too mention that gallery gains are so pitful, one could care less where it is; seriously, [rant mode] when a popular series, translated dojin does not even generate enough GP for 1 hath, who cares about "a gallery"[/rant mode]...

This post has been edited by Red_Piotrus: Apr 16 2011, 18:34

Shouldn't that be secondary to getting new content here as fast as possible?
I see no problem with what begbeg did.

Except if it results in a bunch of galleries going untagged or tagged poorly, in means that content added as fast as possible is much harder to find. As said above it is also rude and inconsiderate to other uploaders.

Red if you are going to complain about gallery gains, gallery earn even less when they are quickly shuffled back to page five.

Not too mention that gallery gains are so pitful, one could care less where it is; seriously, [rant mode] when a popular series, translated dojin does not even generate enough GP for 1 hath, who cares about "a gallery"[/rant mode]...

Well, it is pretty bland… Although it shouldn't be used as an excuse for begbeg's flooding, you raise an important point; something needs to be done about the imbalance in gains between actually contributing to the galleries and passively clicking imaginary monsters.

As said above it is also rude and inconsiderate to other uploaders.

[twitter.com] I think so too.

This post has been edited by 3d0xp0xy: Apr 17 2011, 04:33

you raise an important point; something needs to be done about the imbalance in gains between actually contributing to the galleries and passively clicking imaginary monsters.

Gee, maybe the hverse will be nerfed again, although to make gallery posting competetive, I think one hour of hverse grinding should net you, hmmm, 100 credits? (IMG:[invalid] style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif)

Shrug. The bounties still work, to much of my amazement.

Anyway, back on the subject, of rather, the current off-topic slant, I see nothing discourteous to others in uploading. UPLOADING IS THE PURPOSE OF THE SITE. If you were unlucky to be shafted to page 4 due to his massive high quality uploads, try to be motivated and do the same. Upload more to recover your position, and if this motivates people to upload more good stuff, great. The alternative is introducing some weird quotates and basically saying to people "you are too good for our site, please contribute less good galleries". Many uploaders may give up and simply don't upload stuff. Or upload it later, which hurts people who want those galleries, like, yesterday (IMG:[invalid] style_emoticons/default/smile.gif) With all respect to my fellow discussants - whom I do respect, really - this line of argument is moronic at best.

With regards to wiki backlog, or tagging - well, just work through the backlog. There are many older galleries with such backlogs too. As I said earlier, we could use a SOCOM tag listing, too. But don't blame uploaders for giving us too much good stuff too tag, nor are of course the few vigis to blame (they - we - are doing lots of work, tens of hours per week, for crappy rewards equal to few arena runs in the hverse that can be gained from half an hour play... ops, rant mode again). Blame the usual 1% contributor, 99% leecher rule of 'net life, and move on - with me hoping begbeg will return with more high quality dojin "spam" soon (IMG:[invalid] style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)

Well, they are GOOD galleries - new dojins, not some crappy imagesets. A limit could be put on imagesets, in fact I'd support some serious limits there in general, but I see no reason why somebody should be prevented from uploading 100+ good quality dojin/manga galleries if they have the find.

I agree with this. Since image sets are personally composed content, they are not in imminent risk of being posted by someone else. A few weeks back someone published two pages of imageset galleries in one go, all slapped together consisting of random images with danbooru filenames.

I think we should consider the other uploaders here; they got their galleries pushed five pages back.

You also need to remember that the people checking re-up and doing tags only have so much time. 100+ galleries can easily take a couple of hours to do. This means that a lot of other galleries may be missed.

As much as these are both valid points, the suggestion doesn't solve the problem.

Restricting the number of galleries one can publish wasn't gonna prevent that flood from happening, as the doujin pack begbeg uploaded was sitting at the top of the Share hash database. Considering that it only takes minutes (often, even less) for a book released on Share to end up on the galleries, it was unevitable. I think he has a very fast connection or uses a VPS to upload. Limiting him would only result in the same, or a larger flood put together by regular uploaders as there would be dupes due to the competition.

whats happen 0.0 (IMG:[invalid] style_emoticons/default/dry.gif)

I think we should consider the other uploaders here; they got their galleries pushed five pages back. I don't believe the galleries begbeg published were in danger of being posted by someone else, so they could have spread it out over a few days, at least. Personally, I don't post more than four at time.

Point in this latest topic is that someone's not happy with their uploads getting pushed back. That's just life. Cater to their selfish needs and you will start to see decline in the fast lane. Someone's got more to share, let them have the limelight for a while.

I think SOCOM rename does not list "revotes needed", which is when a gallery has already been renamed, and a new vote results in the old vote still being at 100%+

This is a problem for obvious reasons (but for those who don't grok renaming - unless the renamer posts in the vigi thread, this rename is extremly unlikely to be acted upon by anyone)

Also, having worked with SOCOM renames since day 1, I think that renames in general are unlikely to pass unless they are listed in the rename thread. I'd suggest that a link to the renaming vigi thread be added to the rename pop-up, with a comment that "unless you list rename there, it will likely not be noticed by anyone). At this point I think me and Kitsune are the only two people who try to catch things in the renaming SOCOM, and occasionally we both take breaks and then, all renames just die due to inactivity as nobody posts them on the forums...

This post has been edited by Red_Piotrus: Apr 18 2011, 19:46

I'm not good at explaining and my English is not good too but I will try. (IMG:[invalid] style_emoticons/default/sad.gif)

Is it possible to make a gallery that changed from private to public be bumped to the front page and display the upload time as the time when uploader make it as a public gallery. For example:
https://e-hentai.org/g/356111/2500e9a7a5/
It was posted at 2011-04-17 02:38 as a private gallery but when there is another scan uploaded(today), JamesCID decided to make that private gallery of him to public just a while ago. I think it's not fair for both uploaders.

For the new uploader, if the private gallery is the same quality with him, his gallery would be a dupe even it was absolutely not dupe when he published it (at that time the private gallery still not be changed to public)

For the private gallery uploader, when he publish a private gallery, it will not be bumped to the first page(It will appear as if it was a public gallery that was uploaded at that time in the first place) so that gallery will gain a little GP. Also, that make it's really hard to tag and check if it's dupe or not for the gallery that suddenly appear out of nowhere at 10th+ page of the site.

This post has been edited by shizukuxii: Apr 20 2011, 22:55

I'm not good at explaining and my English is not not good too but I will try. (IMG:[invalid] style_emoticons/default/sad.gif)

Is it possible to make a gallery that changed from private to public be bumped to the front page and display the upload time as the time when uploader make it as a public gallery. For example:
https://e-hentai.org/g/356111/2500e9a7a5/
It was posted at 2011-04-17 02:38 as a private gallery but when there is another scan uploaded(today), JamesCID decided to make that private gallery of him to public just a while ago. I think it's not fair for both uploaders.

For the new uploader, if the private gallery is the same quality with him, his gallery would be a dupe even it was absolutely not dupe when he published it (at that time the private gallery still not be changed to public)

For the private gallery uploader, when he publish a private gallery, it will not be bumped to the first page(It will appear as if it was a public gallery that was uploaded at that time in the first place) so that gallery will gain a little GP. Also, that make it's really hard to tag and check if it's dupe or not for the gallery that suddenly appear out of nowhere at 10th+ page of the site.

Compelling arguments, I second them.

Does the three day limit on privatising galleries also apply to de-privatising them? I can't find anything that says how it works... If it does, it makes this less of a problem than it used to be, but I do agree that uploaders shouldn't be penalised for "dupes" of something that isn't visible at the time of uploading.

And IMO if a gallery is suitable for public viewing it shouldn't be private in the first place. What's the point? Someone else will eventually upload it, probably sooner rather than later.

Most people can't even post private galleries. I'm not sure we need a separate mechanism to handle the exceedingly rare case of submarine galleries.