[X] My Assistant

I don't think the text in that notice is supposed to be taken completely seriously, but rather to make a little fun of those who are overly sensitive to ero guro. The thought that it could be insulting hasn't crossed my mind.

It's not so much insulting, there's just something about that message that rubs me the wrong way. As it stands the message implies there's something wrong with you if you're not offended by the gallery, but personally I thing there's something wrong with you if you are offended by some drawings. The whole "if I don't like it then nobody else should" attitude just pisses me off, and it's people with that attitude that caused the gallery purge and situation with the fjords. With that in mind the message could perhaps be changed to "this gallery may offend moralist fucktards who aren't mature enough to simply ignore it" (IMG:[invalid] style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)

With that in mind the message could perhaps be changed to "this gallery may offend moralist fucktards who aren't mature enough to simply ignore it" (IMG:[invalid] style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)

I like it. Make it happen, Ten-bro!

I was just wondering if there is any way to search for galleries / filter galleries by the number of images?

Also, there's one enhancement of the tag flagging feature I would like to suggest. I like shota, but unless it's yaoi, I'm probably not interested, so adding shotacon as a flagged tag would give many false positives. I'm indifferent to adult yaoi; adding that tag would solve nothing. Now, if there was a way for only combinations of tags to trigger a flag…

This post has been edited by 3d0xp0xy: Jan 1 2011, 09:59

I don't think the text in that notice is supposed to be taken completely seriously, but rather to make a little fun of those who are overly sensitive to ero guro. The thought that it could be insulting hasn't crossed my mind.

I agree on this one. I figured it was a joke based on the more sensitive users' reaction to things they don't like.

I'd like to have "check all/uncheck all" button in the galleries for selecting types of content to display. Clicking on a type below is helpful but limited; sometimes I want to search for two or three types of content, and it requires multiple clicking, or one type and a keyword, which similarly could be made easier.

I would like to see a check box for uploaders so they can stop people posting torronts to their galleries

uh why?
if you don't make a torrent of it somebody else might, if you do but your connection is shit or you're hardly ever online your torrent would be useless and other people making a valid one are more than welcome

also a sort of check like md5 or whatever is used here to ignore the uploading of dupes within the same gallery would be nice

but personally I thing there's something wrong with you if you are offended by some drawings.

"you're a sick fuck"
"NO U"
don't give a shit of guro and all the whining about it but this sentence is plain stupid regardless of what it is about


This post has been edited by luppolo: Jan 22 2011, 14:56

1.Currently the downloader has no control of the torrants placed on their uploads, these torrants are then encouraged to be plased on any and all other sites using the tracker from this site, regardless of what alse these sites are hoasting to encourage longillaty of the torrant.

2.Most or maybe only a large minority hold the person who downloaded the gallery accountable for the torrant as they seem unaware that it could have been actioned by another. Often you see massages that say why are you not seeding your torrant even though the torrant has nothing to do with the original uploder.

3 Anyone can become a torrent leecher and quite a few have many of these people dont download anything and are hard to contact. The downloader is instantlly contactable the person who creates a torrant is able to hide in the shadows.

4. the downloader has no control of whats put on the torrant or the quality of the images on the torrent.

For me point 1 is the the biggest issue a a simple tick box allowing torrants to only be posted to this site would help

1.Currently the downloader has no control of the torrants placed on their uploads, these torrants are then encouraged to be plased on any and all other sites using the tracker from this site, regardless of what alse these sites are hoasting to encourage longillaty of the torrant.

2.Most or maybe only a large minority hold the person who downloaded the gallery accountable for the torrant as they seem unaware that it could have been actioned by another. Often you see massages that say why are you not seeding your torrant even though the torrant has nothing to do with the original uploder.

3 Anyone can become a torrent leecher and quite a few have many of these people dont download anything and are hard to contact. The downloader is instantlly contactable the person who creates a torrant is able to hide in the shadows.

4. the downloader has no control of whats put on the torrant or the quality of the images on the torrent.

For me point 1 is the the biggest issue a a simple tick box allowing torrants to only be posted to this site would help

1. So what?
2. I think it's sad?
3. Huh? Not really.
4. You can try to expunge torrent if you like.

Why do you want this?

just make your own torrent then, add description ORIGINAL or osmething and your fine. whats the problem?

There are alot of people who make torrents for EVERYONES sake, and few of them not working is a minor price to pay

and if you want the gallery really bad with the original quality (if torrent is worse) then just save them one by one, its not hard.

This post has been edited by hanepirukas: Jan 24 2011, 15:41

I'd like to see an option to remove archives from the list of archives under my archives once you are done with them to help clear them out.

Probably already been mentioned but, ability to go to the next page with the arrow keys?

For the paging enlargement hath perk is it possible to choose how many results you would like (the way you can with thumbnail rows) or is it permanently set when you activate the perk?

I've only done the first tier which fits nicely on my laptop monitor, but it would be useful if it could be changed so that the pages fit nicely on a different monitor.

Probably already been mentioned but, ability to go to the next page with the arrow keys?

GM script for those without Quick Browse is buggy so I'm fixing it.

I'd like to see an option to remove archives from the list of archives under my archives once you are done with them to help clear them out.

Would you like to buy a vowel? Could that have been any less clear? (IMG:[invalid] style_emoticons/default/tongue.gif)

This post has been edited by DemonEyesBob: Jan 27 2011, 04:44

It would be nice if file search accepted urls to images, instead of requiring uploads. Mugi can do both, I expect it is not difficult to code in, and it would save some time I and other spent when checking if something is in the galleries or not.

It would be nice if file search accepted urls to images, instead of requiring uploads. Mugi can do both, I expect it is not difficult to code in, and it would save some time I and other spent when checking if something is in the galleries or not.

You can paste url into file open dialog. (I checked on windows only)

This post has been edited by Rikis: Jan 27 2011, 23:21

It would be nice if file search accepted urls to images, instead of requiring uploads. Mugi can do both, I expect it is not difficult to code in, and it would save some time I and other spent when checking if something is in the galleries or not.

You can enter URL with MD5 (I think) hash into your browser to have it search for that hash instead of calculating it from the image. It's been described on the forums about two years ago, but I don't remember where.

This post has been edited by Dlaglacz: Jan 28 2011, 12:39

You can enter URL with MD5 (I think) hash into your browser to have it search for that hash instead of calculating it from the image. It's been described on the forums about two years ago, but I don't remember where.

It's SHA-1

You can paste url into file open dialog. (I checked on windows only)

I don't think it works for me (Firefox).

Also, hashes are good only for identical copies, right? That's rarely what I need.

Also, on the subject of things mugi does better, they have a working grayscale / monotone image search with often produces good results, whereas our monotone search sucks (IMG:[invalid] style_emoticons/default/sad.gif)

This post has been edited by Red_Piotrus: Jan 28 2011, 21:11

Mugi doesn't have 25.6 million images to search through.