 |
 |
 |
E-Hentai Galleries feature requests, centralized place to discuss improvements to the galleries |
|
Jan 28 2014, 05:07
|
hzqr
Group: Gold Star Club
Posts: 4,672
Joined: 13-May 09

|
QUOTE(AntiGod @ Jan 28 2014, 01:59)  More to the point, I'm not sure I entirely understand this "before its time" scenario. Anyone care to elaborate? From what I understand if a person has access to something it is entirely within his/her right to upload it here as s/he feels is necessary. It'll all come out who was the original creator/uploader of the work and they in turn shall reap their sole benefits. Otherwise not much we can do about it... There's a scanner/group that usually provides most of the magazine raws uploaded on the site. Said scanner/group has a policy that scans should not be publicly distributed before X days have passed from the magazine's publication date. This should help boost sales and in turn help the authors. Pretty understandable, frankly. Except the members of this site the scanner/group belongs to are for some reason exempt from this rule and receive the raws as soon as they are scanned (that is, almost immediately - X-EROS #16 was published today). Then sometimes someone comes along, takes the raws, upload it there, and drama ensues.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Jan 28 2014, 05:16
|
Maximum_Joe
Group: Gold Star Club
Posts: 24,074
Joined: 17-April 11

|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Jan 28 2014, 10:38
|
EsotericSatire
Group: Catgirl Camarilla
Posts: 12,595
Joined: 31-July 10

|
QUOTE(tiap @ Jan 27 2014, 17:07)  There's a scanner/group that usually provides most of the magazine raws uploaded on the site. Said scanner/group has a policy that scans should not be publicly distributed before X days have passed from the magazine's publication date. This should help boost sales and in turn help the authors. Pretty understandable, frankly. Except the members of this site the scanner/group belongs to are for some reason exempt from this rule and receive the raws as soon as they are scanned (that is, almost immediately - X-EROS #16 was published today). Then sometimes someone comes along, takes the raws, upload it there, and drama ensues.
Thats an internal issue for the translation group, the same thing happened not so long ago with the Psvita hacks. One group had found an exploit that was probably going to allow them to have elevated access, members spread it to other groups and one member published it and took the credit trying to get attention. Sony patched it a day later and they were set back five years lol. I don't support the vita getting hacked, but its a similar deal. Likewise when I was into fansubbing anime a decade ago, our group was taking a long time for releases and some people (including me) shared the raws on a small scale and they got out and that created a shite storm as well. Its all about internal discipline if they can't accept raws getting released early they shouldn't share them as always gets out. This site can't be accountable for their internal practices.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Jan 28 2014, 14:24
|
Rephikul
Newcomer
 Group: Members
Posts: 36
Joined: 20-July 07

|
QUOTE(Maximum_Joe @ Jan 27 2014, 17:51)  We don't do tags based on negatives.
Say what?
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Jan 28 2014, 23:51
|
CoochNoodle
Newcomer
 Group: Members
Posts: 27
Joined: 23-June 13

|
QUOTE(blue penguin @ Jan 28 2014, 02:06)  How?
That guy was last active in the forums in April 2013, never posted, and therefore probably never read any of the guidelines. That comic was also his only upload in the galleries ever.
Just ranting, without giving any concrete facts or suggestions is counter productive in solving it. Rants are for humorous purposes not real problem solving (it is a little different in politics but we don't practice those in here)
If you only see ranting in my post then i guess the first few words suggesting a solution got scribbled up on your end, or your monitor is smeared in dirt or spit or something on that part when you were viewing it. An announcement field. Simple. Galleries are crying for announcements for when the average user isn't expected to seek information or "guidelines". Comic X-Eros is a big thing, finance so one of our only few lightly censored/almost uncensored comics can make it through by postponing uploading a little is not only worthy in a big fucking way but worthy of its own special *[insert attention]* right on the face of the galleries.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Jan 29 2014, 00:05
|
Binglo
Group: Catgirl Camarilla
Posts: 9,693
Joined: 16-December 09

|
I'd suggest you drop the saucy attitude, or you will destroy any chance of your suggestions being taken seriously in any shape or form.
This post has been edited by binglo: Jan 29 2014, 00:06
|
|
|
Jan 29 2014, 09:06
|
Pillowgirl
Group: Gold Star Club
Posts: 5,458
Joined: 2-December 12

|
QUOTE(EsotericSatire @ Jan 28 2014, 18:38)  Likewise when I was into fansubbing anime a decade ago, our group was taking a long time for releases and some people (including me) shared the raws on a small scale and they got out and that created a shite storm as well.
Its all about internal discipline if they can't accept raws getting released early they shouldn't share them as always gets out. This site can't be accountable for their internal practices.
Sharing and caring don't mix. You can't do both.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Jan 29 2014, 11:23
|
Thot
Group: Gold Star Club
Posts: 1,637
Joined: 15-April 08

|
QUOTE(CoochNoodle @ Jan 28 2014, 22:51)  [...]
The solution is not changing something on this site. It's changing something on the site where the scans are initially distributed. Try coming up with a good way to identify who did the leak, for example. That'd be much more effective than trying to go after just one of the many distribution sites.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Jan 29 2014, 12:00
|
varst
Group: Gold Star Club
Posts: 11,561
Joined: 30-March 10

|
QUOTE(Rephikul @ Jan 28 2014, 07:48)  is it possible to add 3 more tags: "no nipple", "no pussy" and "no sex"?
Nope. QUOTE(CoochNoodle @ Jan 29 2014, 05:51)  If you only see ranting in my post then i guess the first few words suggesting a solution got scribbled up on your end, or your monitor is smeared in dirt or spit or something on that part when you were viewing it.
An announcement field. Simple. Galleries are crying for announcements for when the average user isn't expected to seek information or "guidelines". Comic X-Eros is a big thing, finance so one of our only few lightly censored/almost uncensored comics can make it through by postponing uploading a little is not only worthy in a big fucking way but worthy of its own special *[insert attention]* right on the face of the galleries.
How would an announcement field help in this case? It's not even EH's problem, it happens when the scanlation site decides to be open for registration. It should be their responsibility to ensure that their scanlations won't be distributed before specified date by unspecified person. Or you think EH holds the responsibility which's supposed to be on the scanlation site? This post has been edited by varst: Jan 29 2014, 12:03
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Jan 29 2014, 13:34
|
CoochNoodle
Newcomer
 Group: Members
Posts: 27
Joined: 23-June 13

|
QUOTE(Thot @ Jan 29 2014, 10:23)  The solution is not changing something on this site. It's changing something on the site where the scans are initially distributed. Try coming up with a good way to identify who did the leak, for example. That'd be much more effective than trying to go after just one of the many distribution sites.
This isn't just one of many distribution sites, this is without a doubt the biggest out there, the big daddy, the boss, the main. QUOTE(binglo @ Jan 28 2014, 23:05)  I'd suggest you drop the saucy attitude, or you will destroy any chance of your suggestions being taken seriously in any shape or form.
Your sensitivity is not my problem and if suggestions are taken based on feelings rather than logic then i don't give a damn if i get taken seriously or not. This post has been edited by CoochNoodle: Jan 29 2014, 13:37
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Jan 29 2014, 15:39
|
blue penguin
Group: Gold Star Club
Posts: 10,046
Joined: 24-March 12

|
QUOTE(CoochNoodle @ Jan 29 2014, 11:34)  This isn't just one of many distribution sites, this is without a doubt the biggest out there, the big daddy, the boss, the main. All arguments still hold in this case. Hold even more, given how important their scanlations are their responsibility to prevent such cases is higher. QUOTE Your sensitivity is not my problem and if suggestions are taken based on feelings rather than logic then i don't give a damn if i get taken seriously or not. ^this again: QUOTE(binglo @ Jan 28 2014, 22:05)  I'd suggest you drop the saucy attitude, or you will destroy any chance of your suggestions being taken seriously in any shape or form. And it's probably your last chance, you will be ignored otherwise.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Jan 29 2014, 23:02
|
AntiGod
Group: Gold Star Club
Posts: 587
Joined: 31-December 13

|
As everyone has very nicely put, come up with a solution for the scanlation site. We at E-Hentai are not at all to be held wholly responsible for the actions of certain individuals. If it's not already in the terms of service, I feel like it should be added ASAP so there will be much less confusion in the future.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Jan 29 2014, 23:42
|
Binglo
Group: Catgirl Camarilla
Posts: 9,693
Joined: 16-December 09

|
QUOTE(CoochNoodle @ Jan 29 2014, 12:34)  Your sensitivity is not my problem and if suggestions are taken based on feelings rather than logic then i don't give a damn if i get taken seriously or not.
Right, because referring to someone as a "faggot" and telling us that a "big fat fucking permanent announcement" is needed, is indeed the pinnacle of logic, and in no way was that statement 99% rustled jimmies and 1% logic. I'll repeater myself: Act your age, and make your arguments compelling and you may get somewhere. You know, really basic psychology stuff. Tho come to think of it, perhaps you simply felt the need to piss in the wind and had no actual interest in trying to work out a solution?... In that case, as you were.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Feb 10 2014, 04:21
|
faglord multimum
Lurker
Group: Recruits
Posts: 3
Joined: 4-March 11

|
QUOTE(faglord multimum @ Dec 3 2013, 16:40)  can we get an ability to see how many people have voted on a gallery from the homepage?
gets really annoying to try and find the extremely good galleries from the mediocre ones since for the most part decent/mediocre galleries are simply not voted on as often, making them still show up between 4 and 5 stars but with less voters than the extremely good stuff
reposting this to see if there is any more response! thanks in advance
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Feb 10 2014, 04:25
|
AntiGod
Group: Gold Star Club
Posts: 587
Joined: 31-December 13

|
QUOTE(faglord multimum @ Feb 9 2014, 21:21)  reposting this to see if there is any more response! thanks in advance
Essentially if you want to find "good" galleries you're going to be browsing through it yourself. If you feel the need to like a gallery based on other people's opinions you're free to do that, but just remember only you know what is "good" and what is bad. Viewpoints vary, so it's always good to at least judge a gallery by its thumbnail image. I'm not sure too many of us are up in arms about the number who voted posted, but it surely wouldn't hurt.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Feb 10 2014, 10:43
|
faglord multimum
Lurker
Group: Recruits
Posts: 3
Joined: 4-March 11

|
QUOTE(AntiGod @ Feb 10 2014, 05:25)  Essentially if you want to find "good" galleries you're going to be browsing through it yourself. If you feel the need to like a gallery based on other people's opinions you're free to do that, but just remember only you know what is "good" and what is bad. Viewpoints vary, so it's always good to at least judge a gallery by its thumbnail image. I'm not sure too many of us are up in arms about the number who voted posted, but it surely wouldn't hurt.
oh, i completely agree; its just from experience the things i end up liking tend to be more strongly correlated with things that are heavily reviewed than things i like the look of from the cover art; in most cases i end up clicking it to get a better look at the cover art anyway!
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Feb 11 2014, 17:20
|
SpecDM
Lurker
Group: Lurkers
Posts: 1
Joined: 13-December 09

|
I am not sure if this has been requested before but with the incredible amount of content it gets more and more difficult to decide on a gallery even if you choose a category. I would like to suggest a way to get a Random Gallery within the Category you choose or a way to Randomize the list rather then having the newest or best rated first.
tl;DR Random Gallery Button pls
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Feb 11 2014, 20:46
|
Pillowgirl
Group: Gold Star Club
Posts: 5,458
Joined: 2-December 12

|
QUOTE(SpecDM @ Feb 12 2014, 01:20)  I am not sure if this has been requested before but with the incredible amount of content it gets more and more difficult to decide on a gallery even if you choose a category. I would like to suggest a way to get a Random Gallery within the Category you choose or a way to Randomize the list rather then having the newest or best rated first.
tl;DR Random Gallery Button pls
Spoiler text - Highlight to read... random scat and guro
|
|
|
Feb 11 2014, 22:29
|
marconii2002
Group: Gold Star Club
Posts: 128
Joined: 3-September 08

|
Can you add "Jump to image" works like "Jump to page" but for images ?
|
|
|
Feb 15 2014, 23:24
|
Marien
Group: Members
Posts: 6,805
Joined: 13-January 09

|
I really want a faster way to download galleries in bulk. Can we have an 'Archive Queue/Batch' mechanism? Something that would make a history list of your recently viewed galleries and let you checkbox which ones you want to download. And if possible show the thumbail and tags for said galleries. That way we can download them in categories to the same folders. IE: I check all the galleries with Netorare and download them to my NTR folder. Or all the galleries by a certain artist.
This would be amazing and would save a lot of time.
|
|
|
2 User(s) are reading this topic (2 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
|
 |
 |
 |
|