[X] My Assistant

Can the "Could not vote for tag: You cannot possibly have taken the time to look at the gallery in that short time." message be disabled when downvoting blacklisted tags? You don't really need to look at the gallery to do that.

It's a touch risky, blacklisted tags aren't always just "bag" tags, they could also be leftovers from the namespacing introduction (e.g. misc:monster).

Could we get an operator (or pseudo-namespace, I don't know) to exclude a specific term from tag searches?
e.g. "abc !def" would match galleries having "def" in the title and "abc" in either the title or as a tag
This might also help with the lack of a comic/magazine tag I see a lot of people complaining about (excluding the artist's name from tag searches and leaving the rest of the query untouched could get (almost) all the relevant, non-anthology galleries)

I'm still waiting on searching by image count (IMG:[invalid] style_emoticons/default/sad.gif)

A way to download an archive with the resized images instead of the originals? It would be useful for the times when they're 40 Mpixels each...

I'd want to download it for offline browsing, but moving that many pixels taxes tablets' batteries overmuch (and for no reason at all, since the images are subsequently downsampled for rendering).

A way to download an archive with the resized images instead of the originals? It would be useful for the times when they're 40 Mpixels each...

Not with archives, but you do get that with the Hentai@Home downloader.

Not with archives, but you do get that with the Hentai@Home downloader.

My connection fails the H@H requisites on multiple counts... (IMG:[invalid] style_emoticons/default/anime_cry.gif)
Thanks for the answer, I'll look into cooking something myself with wget or httrack, let's hope not to get things wrong and try downloading the entire internet... (IMG:[invalid] style_emoticons/default/wink.gif)

Actually, for short (up to 40 pages) non-fjorded galleries creating an external HTML gallery and pasting it into JDownloader makes a good job of automating the download.


This post has been edited by JukanX: Jan 23 2014, 00:28

Forgive me if this would be ridiculous to implement but the fyords are really irritating.

My idea is to apply the loli, shota and beast fyording tags to remove individual images instead of the entire gallery. Maybe use an entirely separate system from tagging that's more like the voting system for expunges except with a lower score requirement that matches the mod power threshold we have now.

I've got tons of favorites with many hundreds of images that are a pain to view because it got tagged for 3 images in the middle. There's also a lot of stuff I'd like to upload but won't because I know it'll be removed in the first couple of hours for small amounts of content that aren't the focus of the gallery.

While writing this another idea occurred to me. Maybe all tags could point to specific images so that it's easier to determine whether or not to downvote any given tag.

Maybe all tags could point to specific images so that it's easier to determine whether or not to downvote any given tag.

This has been discussed to death and then some, it's not going to happen

suggestion:
add support for "uploader:xxx" in Tag Flagging in settings
for example: "rewrite, uploader:Goatse"

suggestion:
add support for "uploader:xxx" in Tag Flagging in settings
for example: "rewrite, uploader:Goatse"

Tag flagging would work so sweet with that.

is it possible to add 3 more tags: "no nipple", "no pussy" and "no sex"?
"No nipple" and "no pussy" can only be tagged if it's convenient censorship: hidden by other body parts or text bubbles. light sabers or black king bars do not apply.
"No sex" can only be tagged if there're no on-screen insertion (not sure how same-sex sex work here). Implied sex, like in many ecchi and non-h go here. I've seen some h-lesbian doujin that can qualify (just kissing and light fingering).
Obviously, anything under Non-H imply all 3, unless at least one is specifically stated.

This post has been edited by Rephikul: Jan 28 2014, 01:55

We don't do tags based on negatives.

A big fat fucking permanent announcement field is needed to avoid shit like the humongous faggotry that happened today with that faggot uploading Comic X-Eros before its time.
We owe it at least this much for such a stupid mistake being allowed to happen.

A big fat fucking permanent announcement field is needed to avoid shit like the humongous faggotry that happened today with that faggot uploading Comic X-Eros before its time.
We owe it at least this much for such a stupid mistake being allowed to happen.

How?

That guy was last active in the forums in April 2013, never posted, and therefore probably never read any of the guidelines. That comic was also his only upload in the galleries ever.

Just ranting, without giving any concrete facts or suggestions is counter productive in solving it. Rants are for humorous purposes not real problem solving (it is a little different in politics but we don't practice those in here)

This post has been edited by blue penguin: Jan 28 2014, 03:06

I'm probably going to get some flack for this but fuck it.
I 100% agree on the whole "let's not post scans until the magazines have been out for X" and also blame the credit whore who went ahead and uploaded the thing before its time, but let's not shit ourselves into thinking the original scanners are some innocent victims of this shameless evildoer.
The whole thing happened and continues to happen because the scanner(s?) insist on scanning the magazines early and sharing them exclusively with their secret little club. In a scenario like this, leaks should hardly surprise anyone.
If you don't want this thing to happen, scan the thing when you want to release it and release it immediately.

but fuck it.

Quoting for future out of context citation.

More to the point, I'm not sure I entirely understand this "before its time" scenario. Anyone care to elaborate? From what I understand if a person has access to something it is entirely within his/her right to upload it here as s/he feels is necessary. It'll all come out who was the original creator/uploader of the work and they in turn shall reap their sole benefits. Otherwise not much we can do about it...

never read any of the guidelines.

There are no guidelines pertaining to what he did. As far as this site is concerned, who scanned something and all the drama related to that is totally irrelevant.

There are no guidelines pertaining to what he did. As far as this site is concerned, who scanned something and all the drama related to that is totally irrelevant.

Ops... true, there's no guidelines on that. I know that what he did isn't against any rule, but it's kind of an ass move towards the artists. On the other hand, it's not something that happens everyday (or every month) so you're right it is irrelevent really.

Anyone care to elaborate?

In summary, yesterday/today (27th of January) a guy uploaded Comic X-Eros for February. There is even a note in the magazine saying 2nd of February.

In summary, yesterday/today (27th of January) a guy uploaded Comic X-Eros for February. There is even a note in the magazine saying 2nd of February.

I see... So essentially the bickering is about an upload of an "illegitimate" copy which for all intents and purposes is exactly what will have been released? I'd understand if the guy literally just ripped off the work of a group (I'm assuming one scans this Comic X-Eros mag) and posted it as his own, but if everything's properly cited/noted, it's just earlier publicity. And all publicity is good publicity.