QUOTE(Alpha 7 @ Oct 1 2009, 21:50)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b4102/b4102d32c3ec076c985468968acb146a5a85afec" alt="*"
While Dual-Wielding, I have come to realize that the Process on the Off-Hand weapon happens so rarely that it might as well not have a process. With that I ditched my 3-turn bleed Shortsword for a no-process Dagger with an Attack Accuracy Bonus of 30.3 and AGI +4.8 (+2.8). I lose a bleed I almost never see in exchange for doubled Hit Chance %, and an extra bonus to Action Speed.
Average Platinum Shortsword
====================================
Weapon Damage Type Slashing
Hit Proc: 15% chance for Bleeding Wound
Duration: 3 turns / Damage: 74 (57) per tick
Before
=======
Physical Attack
----------------
+19.1 % damage
+21.6 hit chance
After
=======
Physical Attack
----------------
+18.6 % damage
+42.3 hit chance
Following up, and according to Battle Buddy...
DW w/ Bleeding Shortsword
================
Battle stats:
Melee accuracy: 78.08%
Melee crit chance: 6.38%
Offhand hit chance: 2.77%
DW w/ Dagger (19 Rounds of CakeFest)
================
Battle stats:
Melee accuracy: 90.43%
Melee crit chance: 7.06%
Offhand hit chance: 10.88%
Both an increase of actual Hit % and off-hand %.
Doing the math on the chance of an Off-Hand process actually happening. The possibility of 2 unlikely events occurring at the same time is: the odds of the first event multiplied by the odds of the second event.
My Off-Hand hit chance is 15.4%
The Bleed chance was 20%
0.154 x 0.2 = 0.0308 or 1 bleed every 32.5 Main Hand hits, making the bleed process hardly worth having. In actual gameplay it seemed even less frequently occurring.