what's really amusing is this is triggered by a "mere 37k".
anyway, assuming what sssss said is all true,
Wouldn't by taking the credits piyin also breaching his own rule?
QUOTE
3) No post On this thread = No deal (MM and PM will be ignored if you dont post here or will be charged with a % of penalty... so read the rules).
from that point, a MM/PM without post could either 1. being ignored, or 2 charged with penalty.
taking the attached credits isn't really what "ignoring" is.
he could charge penalty by taking a portion as a "bothering me eventough there's no deal"-penalty then return the rest with the notification.
but what piyin did in this "m37k case" is neither of those 2, he didn't ignore it since he take the money, he also didn't charge a % penalty. Only after sss ask for refund, he forces a deal on what he define as no deal then shoving the goods while also asking for penalty payments.
but sure piyin could later say that % is meant 100% so he took it all - which is a dick move - though anybody would be able to reply with another dick argument as "a %" should mean one percent, since a is used to denote a singular item, so what he could take is only 1% of what sent to him..
but yeah, this:
QUOTE(cirrux @ Aug 23 2016, 18:04)

Before more lynching, piyin should be given a chance to defend himself from these allegations. However, it seems it will require a large burden on him to put himself ina good light.
Sending credits with the intention of buying items which piyin had knowledge of is scamming no mater what his rules say. The rules are only binding if piyin himself gave something to the buyer in return.