Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

6 Pages V < 1 2 3 4 > »   
Closed TopicStart new topic
> E-Hentai Update Log 2016

 
post Jan 8 2016, 04:20
Post #21
Honeycat



Extra Hissy
************
Group: Catgirl Camarilla
Posts: 61,596
Joined: 25-February 07
Level 500 (Godslayer)


But what if people half-star galleries because they think those galleries truly suck?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

 
post Jan 8 2016, 04:50
Post #22
eastmoonbaby



Lurker
Group: Lurkers
Posts: 1
Joined: 7-January 16


improving the search tool is really a big step bro
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

 
post Jan 8 2016, 05:10
Post #23
Maximum_Joe



Legendary Poster
***********
Group: Gold Star Club
Posts: 24,074
Joined: 17-April 11
Level 500 (Dovahkiin)


QUOTE(Sesshomaru Moon @ Jan 7 2016, 21:20) *

But what if people half-star galleries because they think those galleries truly suck?

They can still do that.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

 
post Jan 8 2016, 15:52
Post #24
blue12



Newcomer
**
Group: Members
Posts: 78
Joined: 30-October 10
Level 248 (Destined)


QUOTE(tazmanian devil @ Jan 5 2016, 22:29) *

If I were a wagering man I'd say that people who exclusively (or nearly exclusively) low-rate galleries and down-vote comments will now not have their "contributions" counted towards the toplist, thereby causing them to waste their time.

I wonder how long it'll take said people to notice they're not getting any rewards and come to the forums to whine, only to have us laugh at them?


Probably never, for some of them (IMG:[invalid] style_emoticons/default/tongue.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

 
post Jan 8 2016, 21:25
Post #25
dlactionn



Casual Poster
***
Group: Members
Posts: 103
Joined: 5-June 11
Level 275 (Godslayer)


QUOTE(Sesshomaru Moon @ Jan 8 2016, 05:20) *

But what if people half-star galleries because they think those galleries truly suck?

Surely if you rate 0.5-5 and the average is somewhere between 2 and 4 you're not going to be affected. People who rate 0.5 or 5 might lose their power and I might be one of them since I'm too lazy to rate something that has is not brilliant or so bad, I'd love it to get deleted from existence.



$ is all I need, thanks!
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

 
post Jan 10 2016, 22:39
Post #26
diddlyding



Ahego is the only way to go
****
Group: Members
Posts: 441
Joined: 18-April 12
Level 419 (Dovahkiin)


QUOTE(Sesshomaru Moon @ Jan 7 2016, 20:20) *

But what if people half-star galleries because they think those galleries truly suck?


I would assume they would only have to browse and rate (highly) a gallery they do like to balance it all out. If someone is just going around putting half stars on all the galleries, they're just doing it to be a little shit. A legitimate user is going to like something, otherwise they're in the wrong place and their votes shouldn't count anyways.

*edit: poor pronoun usage

This post has been edited by diddlyding: Jan 10 2016, 22:41
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

 
post Jan 11 2016, 08:51
Post #27
antie



Newcomer
**
Group: Members
Posts: 63
Joined: 13-November 11
Level 341 (Godslayer)


can we imply that same thing happened with "male only$"
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

 
post Jan 11 2016, 09:00
Post #28
Superlatanium



Dreaming of optimizing the system
**********
Group: Gold Star Club
Posts: 7,603
Joined: 27-November 13
Level 500 (Godslayer)


QUOTE(antie @ Jan 11 2016, 06:51) *
can we imply that same thing happened with "male only$"
"males only$"
would be the search string, since the tag is "males only" not "male only"
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

 
post Jan 11 2016, 10:16
Post #29
exh1001



Lurker
Group: Lurkers
Posts: 2
Joined: 11-January 16


cant the tag be male only aswell not just males
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

 
post Jan 11 2016, 10:23
Post #30
Superlatanium



Dreaming of optimizing the system
**********
Group: Gold Star Club
Posts: 7,603
Joined: 27-November 13
Level 500 (Godslayer)


QUOTE(exh1001 @ Jan 11 2016, 08:16) *
cant the tag be male only aswell not just males
http://ehwiki.org/wiki/males_only
"Requires at least two males interacting."

If you wanted just a single male, you would search for
m:solo action
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

 
post Jan 12 2016, 08:57
Post #31
Superlatanium



Dreaming of optimizing the system
**********
Group: Gold Star Club
Posts: 7,603
Joined: 27-November 13
Level 500 (Godslayer)


QUOTE(Tenboro @ Jan 4 2016, 11:32) *
- You can now put a $ at the end of a search term to force the search engine to treat it as a tag and do an exact search rather than searching all tags that start with the term. This works both with and without a namespace.
Thanks, this'll make certain things with cleanup much easier!

But I found something. The faux-namespace "uploader" does not behave well with $. This wouldn't be a problem in almost all situations, but when going from an uploader's plain search results
https://e-hentai.org/uploader/StatisticallyNP
and then clicking on "Display Thumbnails" or "Display List", $ is added to the end and the search fails because "uploader" is not a real namespace. I think. It might be due to the "&f_exact=1" in the link on the /uploader/* page, since when that is removed it seems to change the display type as expected and use the correct "uploader:" string without $.

Uploader:usernames with spaces also fail, but it's a bit worse.
https://e-hentai.org/uploader/no%2Bcondom...253D%2Bno%2Bsex
uploader:"no condom = no sex"
turns into
no condom = no sex"$" uploader:""
Same problem, same solution.

Ordinary searching for "uploader:" looks to be OK because there's no "&f_exact=1".
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

 
post Jan 13 2016, 18:15
Post #32
iceloops



Casual Poster
****
Group: Members
Posts: 346
Joined: 7-April 15
Level 216 (Godslayer)


dont know what it means but it sounds nice
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

 
post Jan 14 2016, 00:47
Post #33
Tenboro

Admin




QUOTE(Superlatanium @ Jan 12 2016, 07:57) *

This wouldn't be a problem in almost all situations, but when going from an uploader's plain search results
https://e-hentai.org/uploader/StatisticallyNP
and then clicking on "Display Thumbnails" or "Display List", $ is added to the end and the search fails because "uploader" is not a real namespace.


This behavior should be fixed now.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

 
post Jan 21 2016, 20:36
Post #34
bazrael



Newcomer
*
Group: Members
Posts: 21
Joined: 22-July 13
Level 11 (Novice)


What's the difference between "females only$" and "females only"$ <-??? I found their outputs had different numbers.

QUOTE
Note that if searching for a tag with multiple words, quotes must be used - for example "females only$"

@ Mrsuperhappy: Thanks for reply. However, my question is that if $ puts in the end of double quotes ("multiple words"$), is this the same as that $ puts between double quotes? ("multiple words$")

This post has been edited by bazrael: Jan 22 2016, 19:59
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

 
post Jan 21 2016, 20:56
Post #35
Mrsuperhappy



Elite Poster
**********
Group: Global Mods
Posts: 9,327
Joined: 23-May 14
Level 435 (Godslayer)


QUOTE(bazrael @ Jan 21 2016, 18:36) *

What's the difference between "females only$" and "females only"$ <-??? I found their outputs had different numbers.


https://e-hentai.org/?f_doujinshi=1&f...ly=Apply+Filter

Some galleries actually are called 'females only' rather than having the tag of females only, that may acccount for it.

This post has been edited by Mrsuperhappy: Jan 21 2016, 20:56
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

 
post Jan 21 2016, 23:24
Post #36
Necromusume



Bunny Shark
*********
Group: Catgirl Camarilla
Posts: 6,868
Joined: 17-May 12
Level 500 (Ponyslayer)


QUOTE(Tenboro @ Jan 4 2016, 11:32) *
2016-01-17
- Pre-recruit members can no longer use image links or named links in private messages. Plain links are still fine.

We are getting bug reports about this in a couple other threads.
QUOTE(mikick @ Jan 21 2016, 00:43) *
'You must be in the Recruits group or higher to use advanced URL functions in private messages. Please leave it as a plain link.'

This is the error message I received when I'd tried to send the PM to somebody.

I tested and found out that no matter whom I send and even without links, I was destined to see that message.

QUOTE(hentropy @ Jan 21 2016, 07:25) *
I'm having the same problem, my PMs get blocked for URL features even though there are none.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

 
post Jan 22 2016, 16:05
Post #37
Tenboro

Admin




QUOTE(mechafujoshi @ Jan 21 2016, 22:24) *

We are getting bug reports about this in a couple other threads.


I just fixed one potential issue with this. If someone is still having issues sending PMs with plain URLs and without URLs entirely, send it to me instead and I'll take a look. (That bypasses the check.)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

 
post Feb 2 2016, 11:52
Post #38
TastyName



Lurker
Group: Lurkers
Posts: 2
Joined: 14-January 16
Level 134 (Ascended)


a new thing yay.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

 
post Feb 7 2016, 08:23
Post #39
greycmd



Newcomer
*
Group: Members
Posts: 34
Joined: 13-January 12
Level 58 (Newbie)


Im having issues accessing the site at all and i tried all the FAQ stuff to fix it , any one know why?

Seamslike it might be a IP ban for some reason if i access through my router i just get a blank screen.

This post has been edited by greycmd: Feb 7 2016, 08:54
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

 
post Feb 14 2016, 06:39
Post #40
ctxl



バカ
****
Group: Members
Posts: 425
Joined: 20-May 12
Level 455 (Godslayer)


http://ehwiki.org/index.php?title=To_Be_Ad...amp;oldid=35214

Does this potential new "viewing mode" mean we're going to get a hybrid thumbnail+list view with tags displayed in-line (à la lofi galleries/fakku)?

yolo, made my own metadata-rich display mode; noticed that the thumbnail URLs returned by the API for newly uploaded galleries sometimes 404 (but sort themselves out in a couple minutes)

looking forward to the new viewing mode (mpv on steroids pls)

This post has been edited by ctxl: Feb 22 2016, 15:11
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post


6 Pages V < 1 2 3 4 > » 
Closed TopicStart new topic
2 User(s) are reading this topic (2 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 


Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 7th May 2025 - 04:36