QUOTE(blue penguin @ Aug 5 2020, 22:01)

As a desktop it is brilliant - have not needed to reinstall anything major since 2012-13 . My xmonad broke some 2-3 times but nothing that some pacman-fu does not solve after half an hour of work.
For a server it is a nightmare. You need to update it often but there are no long term support kernel versions - so you do need to fully restart the machine every couple of days.
I find arch quite annoying. I'm sure I could get used to it in time, but for one thing pacman does not make searching anywhere near as easy as apt-cache/apt-file can. And I forget what exactly we talked about before, but wasn't it about using the 'immutable' flag to stop pacman from replacing a config file?
For another, it's pretty limited in terms of CPU architectures, and it makes it a bit trickier to set up a cross-compilation toolchain/environment.
Also, the prevalence AUR's tend to make people fall into some bad habits/depend on them too much (I think). It's pretty much exactly why I hated PPA's in Ubuntu, even if I hate PPA's quite a bit more.
I've thought about using xmonad, but FVWM's been pretty good to me so I'm still using that for the foreseeable future. I'm actually using FVWM 3 (built from git sources) right now, which isn't technically released yet but has made several improvements (including finally proper xrandr support).
Despite all of this, I don't really
dislike arch or anything, I just don't know it well enough and might be missing a couple of design rationales. I think your ability to keep it running for around 7-8 years shows it's as capable as Debian Sid (rolling release) of "not falling to pieces."
All of this said, my debian desktop hasn't been rebooted for 46 days so far (it lost power 46 days ago).
This post has been edited by dragontamer8740: Aug 6 2020, 05:42