QUOTE(chaos-x @ Jul 27 2014, 21:15)

This stupid update screws me over colossally. I had to pay 3k GP for a 6MB gallery. Really appreciate being treated like dirt.
I'll quote myself from the patch topic:
See Joe above for the quote.
People, read patch issues,
understand, and... Joe, what happened to Shadow Weaver? Is he still around?
Because seriously.
QUOTE(Shadow Weaver @ Jan 28 2009, 13:08)

Dude you have 500! I've used about 60-70 and I guarantee I've seen a hell of a lot more galleries than you. Be more selective, be less horny.
Shadow Weaver is (was?) a Vigilante and has spent a lot of time working on all galleries. I doubt this update would affect him in any way. If it did, he'd understand.
Let's redirect people to the
patch notes if that hasn't been done yet...
- Focus on the very first post. Don't read between the lines. Read it. Read all of it. Read the
major reason it happened.
- There was a worse system before fluctuating with server exhaustion. Do you want that back? This could potentially be much more damaging to your funds.
- If you still don't get it, please learn how a server cluster works and how individuals pushing a truckload of
PHP archive requests to it collectively exhaust it by doing it totally wrong.
- For people like me with a short temper and a short attention span, here's the tl;dr version:
As long as you
don't cause the server to recreate an archive (this increases server
processing load), you will
not be charged extra, unless you download
too many archives (this increases server
bandwidth load). An even shorter version is download popular stuff and not lots of it. Or use torrents if they exist for older ones and
wait, as they are likely to exist. Simple, right?
This post has been edited by Mika Kurogane: Jul 28 2014, 04:01