[X] My Assistant

Possibly, though I thought it was more because they feared a woman's prowess with a flail. Viking women would often storm into battle to beat the fuck out of invading hordes and use enemy soldiers as clubs.

They were hardcore.

Could be wrong, though, since I'm not too familiar with American slang.

I don't get you Westies sometimes.

Is it bad that I'm a male feminist with an inferiority complex?

They were hardcore.

Could be wrong, though, since I'm not too familiar with American slang.

I don't get you Westies sometimes.

This is proper usage of the slang, yes.

Honestly we'd rather the rest of the world not use our slang. You'd just fuck it up in poor execution or improper usage.

Is it bad that I'm a male feminist with an inferiority complex?

If you like contradicting your beliefs, sure.

If you like contradicting your beliefs, sure.

wat

What the cock.

Who the hell is this Rickis [Martin] person? And why should I care?

Who the hell is this Rickis [Martin] person?

No one.

And why should I care?

You shouldn't.

Feminists are just annoyed cause they're ugly and no guy will go near them. There I said it.

Can't make a baby without sperm. That's the biggest reason feminism is just awful.

Can't make a baby without sperm. That's the biggest reason feminism is just awful.

[www.dailymail.co.uk] Wah-wah-wah-whaaaaaaaaaaa~

no way, something tells me to not click that (IMG:[invalid] style_emoticons/default/dry.gif)
even though it wasn't for me in the first place... but curiousity... it's there...

It basically says "Hey, you can make a sperm-type substance by using bone marrow."

It's scientific, I don't use shock images or videos when I'm trying to prove a point, dear.

Well, if that's the case, I will click the link sir.
Last time I clicked a random link somewhere, I got a mental scar for life. Well, each time that something reminds me that actually... the horror X__X

[www.dailymail.co.uk] Wah-wah-wah-whaaaaaaaaaaa~

....wat

....wat

It basically says "Hey, you can make a sperm-type substance by using bone marrow."

But judging by your inability to read threads, I shouldn't have expected you to be able to read an article about something fairly simple to understand.

It basically says "Hey, you can make a sperm-type substance by using bone marrow."

Thus the "...wat"
But being published in 2007, I'm rather curious as to where they are now.
But I'm busy reading something for class to google it now.

It basically says "Hey, you can make a sperm-type substance by using bone marrow."

Well, I guess now we can be born "from Adam's rib". (IMG:[invalid] style_emoticons/default/laugh.gif)

No. That's just silly what you said. :/

Can't make a baby without sperm. That's the biggest reason feminism is just awful.

It basically says "Hey, you can make a sperm-type substance by using bone marrow."

It's scientific, I don't use shock images or videos when I'm trying to prove a point, dear.

> Make babies using sperm.

Better yet:

> Overpopulate earth more so feminism shrinks even faster as a minority of people.

> Overpopulate earth more so feminism shrinks even faster as a minority of people.

That is not how statistics work, sir. If 10% of the population are feminists out of 6 billion (600MM), 2% of the population will be feminists out of 600 billion (60 billion). So if they're not a minority now, they won't be simply because the population increased, especially as it is a belief, not an ethnicity.

Conversely, how is babby formed? How girl get pregnant?

This post has been edited by noahbody: Jan 26 2011, 10:41