[X] My Assistant

Stunned targets can't parry. Just use Fus Ro Dah.

something more to it apart from the "How the fuck do I get rid of enemy parry" roadblock...

Although I think I can see what Tenb trying to do when he came up with this scheme and it does work pretty well. However, as history has show us, it's an extremely dangerous move to directly tinkering with how stun work— it's too easily ended up exploding in your face! (IMG:[invalid] style_emoticons/default/heh.gif)


@T_Starrk

I'm considering it right now, in fact! (IMG:[invalid] style_emoticons/default/ph34r.gif)

If only someone could leveling my mace for free— so damn lazy... (IMG:[invalid] style_emoticons/default/sleep.gif)

If only someone could leveling my mace for free— so damn lazy... (IMG:[invalid] style_emoticons/default/sleep.gif)

Ask your mom for some cash. (IMG:[invalid] style_emoticons/default/rolleyes.gif) I paid HTTP/308 when I didn't want to do it by myself.

Stunned targets can't parry. Just use Fus Ro Dah.

But that would remove the Godslayer bonus (IMG:[invalid] style_emoticons/default/mellow.gif)

If only someone could leveling my mace for free— so damn lazy... (IMG:[invalid] style_emoticons/default/sleep.gif)

You can pay me to do it than i turn around and pay HTTP/308 to do it (IMG:[invalid] style_emoticons/default/laugh.gif)

Mostly, I'm quite satisfied with new update to 0.77.

Especially the stunned target can't parry really helped me a lot especially in new difficulties.

Just feel I'm luckier in this new update.

Since playing one week already got two legendaries and many useful exquisites (IMG:[invalid] style_emoticons/default/tongue.gif)

And new difficulty adds a new sparks into the boring battle (IMG:[invalid] style_emoticons/default/rolleyes.gif)

Thanks Mr.Tenbie !

This post has been edited by Frostbite: Sep 16 2013, 09:02

- Max specific mitigation reduction from Imperil was reduced to 40 percentage points for elemental and 25 percentage points for holy/dark.

It's still 50/30 for me unless the new scan is bugged.

- The "Fine" equipment quality was retired. Equipment quality ranges were adjusted for this.

Averagefest instead Superiorfest... (IMG:[invalid] style_emoticons/default/cry.gif)

Hm...upon reading some rumors, I decide to have a check and the result's affirmative.

Tenboro, is that intentional to have out-of-battle HP/MP/SP regeneration happen during battles?

Hm...upon reading some rumors, I decide to have a check and the result's affirmative.

Tenboro, is that intentional to have out-of-battle HP/MP/SP regeneration happen during battles?

Before patch there's no HP/MP/SP regen though ^^;

I've confirmed it. Yes it is.

Switch to mace (IMG:[invalid] style_emoticons/default/laugh.gif)

Or switch to club + shield

I've confirmed it. Yes it is.

You confirm with Tenboro, or you confirm there's such a change?

After playing for a few days I have to say without a doubt my favorite change is the base stats showing up when you mouse over the stats on equipment pop-ups. For someone like me who never uses scripts it's just so fucking convenient.

You confirm with Tenboro, or you confirm there's such a change?

I confirm there is such a change.

I think logically it's sound, since if we are dead the consequence is harsher ( i.e : all HP/MP/SP is fully depleted )

>partial resists

Best patch ever

I like the idea behind partial resists, but I'm no longer sure I like the way they have been are implemented.

When I first read the patch notes, I was pretty tired, so my understanding was that the resist rolls functioned as a chain, where the next resist roll would only happen if the previous resist roll was successful.

But now when I reread the patch notes, the impression I get is that each monster has three individual chances at resisting your spell and significantly decreasing your damage. Without knowing any greater details, I now have the thought that my damage is being reduced by at least 50% more often than it was fully mitigated under the previous system.

I'm not really sure which model is correct, if either is.

if it's 3 separate rolls and not consecutive rolls, due to 3 rolls being 90% instead of 87.5%, monsters overall have about 2% more benefit from resist, but as a result, monsters no longer block debuffs from offensive spells, which is the most important part.

if it's 3 consecutive rolls made only on successes, then monsters actually have less protection from resists due to the BASE protection being half of resist %. but considering the benefit of debuffs/explosions landing properly, I consider a less than 2% loss in base damage a good tradeoff.

This post has been edited by Bunker Buster: Sep 16 2013, 12:44

I'm not really sure which model is correct, if either is.

You're dealing at most ~10% less damage if you only consider resist, but your spells land 30% more often so there's a better chance to have spell procs.

You're dealing at most ~10% less damage if you only consider resist, but your spells land 30% more often so there's a better chance to have spell procs.

So it's buff for mages and nerf for LA?

Buff for LA, if the separate model is correct. Otherwise, nerf for LA.

As for trading 2% of your damage for spell procs, I'm not sure it is a good trade for non-holy mages and lower level mages who don't have high spell proc rate, and can't be bothered to map it out right now - however, it is certainly buff for counter-resist and prof.

Say you have 50% resist and 0 evade/block— can any mathmagician around here enlighten me on whether my math is correct? ... (IMG:[invalid] style_emoticons/default/huh.gif)

Old Resist :
50% - full dmg
50% - no dmg

New Resist :
12.5% - full dmg
12.5% - 1/10 dmg
37.5% - 1/4 dmg
37.5% - 1/2 dmg