[X] My Assistant

I'm still playing with the relative weighting of raw speed vs quality to get the lowest possible global failure average, but of course, since the semi-static routing tables can last for up to 24 hours it takes that long before I can see the full effect.

Can't figure out what's the problem that all my clients are droping in quality while they are using different network (different ISP).

So~just wait to see then.

Well, want to tell some more.

I notice that some of my clients in sometime are always getting image but not sharing,
that is, the client like stopped for about a minute, then download an image, never uploading.
This status may take a half hour or even more, then it goes back to normal.
Since I can't always look at the cmd, so I don't know how frequently it is, but at least I saw it 4 times in the past 24hours.

This post has been edited by andywong: Mar 13 2013, 19:11

Quality on low speed spectrum seems to be doubled up now
But the usage is still inconsistent

What kind of setup do people like G Just G, StonyCat, Ichy, etc have anyways to reach those kinds of numbers? Multiple gigabit boxes?

I've got eighteen H@H clients spread over multiple 100Mbs connections, 1gbs connections, and a couple on 10gbs connections.

As for a few days ago the datacenter hosting some of my euro servers lost power and the servers shutdown.

Jesus, how much does it cost a month for all that? Are they dedicated with VMs or VPSes with VMs?

I've got an FTTH connection where I run two H@H clients. The connection is at the moment limited to 100MB (on the ethernet ports on my stupid FTTH switch), but I'm gonna upgrade it to 1GB in the near future. I happen to be the admin to the local fiber network so I can do these upgrades/changes at no cost (IMG:[invalid] style_emoticons/default/tongue.gif). I only pay 10 euros + tax for my connection a month.

So 7785 quality is OK?

I wonder how many USA clients are hosted on ColoCrossing.

9222 and rising. (IMG:[invalid] style_emoticons/default/smile.gif) Wonder how I'll get it past 9500, heh.

Oh, in case you're wondering, I am on Bytesized Hosting.

This post has been edited by lovehcomics: Mar 19 2013, 03:07

Heads up, Java 8 is on its way and I really [www.techempower.com] really hope you like lambdas!

meh... it still misses tail recursion. Tail recurssion was to be added in java 8 and was postponed to 9, recently it was postponed even more and will not be in 9 anymore. God only knows when there will be real recursion in java (IMG:[invalid] style_emoticons/default/dry.gif)

meh... it still misses tail recursion. Tail recurssion was to be added in java 8 and was postponed to 9, recently it was postponed even more and will not be in 9 anymore. God only knows when there will be real recursion in java (IMG:[invalid] style_emoticons/default/dry.gif)

You're in an imperative language. Just optimize the tail recursion out yourself.

You're in an imperative language. Just optimize the tail recursion out yourself.

Never found a way of doing it, although my java knowledge is crap so maybe there's a way and I simply did not find it yet. How would you suggesst doing the tail recursion optimization by hand? i.e. do you maybe happen to know how can I modify the function call stack, in java, to throw away the unneeded function retunrs and return controll directly to the beginning of the recursion (instead of accumulating the unneeded function retuns, and the unneded stack of each function, in memory)?

Heads up, Java 8 is on its way and I really [www.techempower.com] really hope you like lambdas!

Eh, it's just syntactic sugar for passing functions as arguments. Which you can do already by using interfaces.

How would you suggesst doing the tail recursion optimization by hand?

Rewrite the recursion to an iteration?

Rewrite the recursion to an iteration?

Eeeeewwwwww.....
That's what I want to get rid off in the first place (IMG:[invalid] style_emoticons/default/dry.gif)

Nevermind, I must have wondered too far away into strange and unknown lands, sorry.
*blue penguin humbly returns into Erlang and Haskell land leaving lamba functions in imperative languages to the ones more versed in them. On the way back he murmures to himself "nothing changed in there since I left the imperative land the first time"*

This post has been edited by blue penguin: Mar 30 2013, 22:08

[a generic post about Python]