 |
 |
 |
Hentai@Home Quality |
|
Mar 11 2013, 00:08
|
burdik
Newcomer
 Group: Recruits
Posts: 10
Joined: 5-May 10

|
My H@H had a blackout due to the hard drive failure (strange thing that H@H didn't give neither IO errors nor warnings) I fixed that, and reenabled it, seeing a trust of 300 and the quality of 2k The strange part is that my quality is now decreasing, though trust goes up as normal
Is there a timeout for it's growth?
EDIT: restarted it one more time, quality began to raise as normal
This post has been edited by burdik: Mar 11 2013, 00:19
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Mar 11 2013, 01:02
|
Arith Undine
Group: Catgirl Camarilla
Posts: 815
Joined: 24-August 11

|
QUOTE(Tenboro @ Mar 10 2013, 16:26)  Quality is calculated by comparing your average failure rate with your average hit rate - meaning it's largely independent of raw speed - together with some additional conditions if trust is low. This gets averaged over a long period of time, with the actual fractional gain or loss depending on whether the current quality is higher or lower than the averaged quality. (Basically, you drop quality much faster than you gain it, to avoid an oscillating load effect.)
~6000 is slightly lower than the average quality (currently ~6800), which means you probably had a period of many files being dropped. If there weren't any network interruptions, the client probably had a period of being overloaded in some way.
Would you add the average quality on the H@H status page later? (IMG:[ invalid] style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Mar 11 2013, 01:12
|
Hairs Fan
Group: Members
Posts: 859
Joined: 15-September 08

|
QUOTE(Tenboro @ Mar 10 2013, 16:26)  Quality is calculated by comparing your average failure rate with your average hit rate - meaning it's largely independent of raw speed - together with some additional conditions if trust is low. [...]
Thanks for the explanations. I guess the "immediate" failure rate is directly linked to the trust value, right ? QUOTE(Tenboro @ Mar 10 2013, 16:26)  If there weren't any network interruptions, the client probably had a period of being overloaded in some way.
That's what I thought, but none of these issues seems to have happened. Anyway, my client utilization is slowly going back to normal, so yeah, maybe it was a coincidence that it faced issues the same day the new system had been set up. QUOTE(tehg @ Mar 10 2013, 18:32)  @Hairs Fan: Where can I get these fancy graphs? I need moar stats (IMG:[ invalid] style_emoticons/default/smile.gif) I use collectd+drraw to generate mines, which probably implies to have a Linux/Unix system.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Mar 11 2013, 01:28
|
burdik
Newcomer
 Group: Recruits
Posts: 10
Joined: 5-May 10

|
QUOTE(Hairs Fan @ Mar 11 2013, 03:12)  I use collectd+drraw to generate mines, which probably implies to have a Linux/Unix system.
Thanks for the tip, as I had problems running GUI H@H under Ubuntu and had no stats available What about disconnections? Connection errors due to peers don't seem to cause trouble for trust, but do they affect quality?
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Mar 11 2013, 11:28
|
Tenboro

|
QUOTE(Hairs Fan @ Mar 11 2013, 00:12)  Thanks for the explanations. I guess the "immediate" failure rate is directly linked to the trust value, right ? To some extent. Trust tanks if you fail client-to-client tests, as well as if your client has a very high failure rate. But unlike quality, trust is mostly treated as a binary trusted/untrusted condition, so it doesn't directly affect how traffic is prioritized. QUOTE(burdik @ Mar 11 2013, 00:28)  What about disconnections? Connection errors due to peers don't seem to cause trouble for trust, but do they affect quality? You're taking about those random "connection interrupted or closed by remote host" messages that pop up from time to time? It depends, but mostly those are people who don't wait for the image to fully load before jumping on to the next one, and in those cases it wouldn't affect it.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Mar 11 2013, 18:53
|
colossol
Newcomer
 Group: Members
Posts: 23
Joined: 21-June 11

|
QUOTE(Tenboro @ Mar 10 2013, 04:24)  Those are more than likely due to temporary network issues on your or your ISP's end.
My network service is three pairs of redundant 10GB fibre links out to Comcast, Cogent, Level 3 and a couple of others, with backup through Big APE; plus several direct connections to the Internet 2 backbone, with backup through Harvard NOX. I'm reasonably confident that my H@H trust issues haven't been ISP glitches.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Mar 11 2013, 19:38
|
Tenboro

|
QUOTE(colossol @ Mar 11 2013, 17:53)  My network service is three pairs of redundant 10GB fibre links out to Comcast, Cogent, Level 3 and a couple of others, with backup through Big APE; plus several direct connections to the Internet 2 backbone, with backup through Harvard NOX. I'm reasonably confident that my H@H trust issues haven't been ISP glitches.
Multi-homing with BGP can still fail. I didn't get to your logs early enough to say anything for sure, but it might have been the same issue as the guy in this thread. Let me know if there are further problems.
|
|
|
Mar 11 2013, 19:49
|
colossol
Newcomer
 Group: Members
Posts: 23
Joined: 21-June 11

|
BGP can fail. It's very unlikely to fail outright given the network that I'm on. Look up my H@H client IP address and then PM me if you'd care to discuss in more detail.
|
|
|
Mar 11 2013, 22:03
|
Ichy
Group: Catgirl Camarilla
Posts: 13,061
Joined: 19-February 09

|
Waiting for my 1 GBPS Monster to be set up. Lets see if this grants me a perma 10000 (IMG:[ invalid] style_emoticons/default/tongue.gif)
|
|
|
Mar 12 2013, 01:32
|
PK678353
Group: Gold Star Club
Posts: 1,454
Joined: 7-November 10

|
How much does that server run you, Ichy?
|
|
|
Mar 12 2013, 05:43
|
Ichy
Group: Catgirl Camarilla
Posts: 13,061
Joined: 19-February 09

|
QUOTE(PK678353 @ Mar 12 2013, 01:32)  How much does that server run you, Ichy?
Dunno. Still waiting for it to set up. Germans are lazy bastards and wont do shit at night (IMG:[ invalid] style_emoticons/default/dry.gif)
|
|
|
Mar 12 2013, 12:51
|
Kakaloll1111
Lurker
Group: Recruits
Posts: 3
Joined: 12-March 13

|
Wow really?
|
|
|
Mar 12 2013, 14:38
|
burdik
Newcomer
 Group: Recruits
Posts: 10
Joined: 5-May 10

|
QUOTE(Tenboro @ Mar 11 2013, 21:38)  it might have been the same issue as the guy in this thread. I think have something like that, only for Quality metric now I checked on stats just a minute ago and saw 3k quality together with 1k Trust. I'd thought that "My ISP broke something" but as I refreshed the stats, Quality was building itself back up at a pretty high rate. Then, half an hour later it began to drop back It is stabilized near 3.5k, which doesn't make any sense, and my H@H now never gets upload speed over 300KB/s because of this I'm also getting my max speed at 3/4 of maximum burst, which doesn't make any sense neither, as H@H speedtests show the full speed This post has been edited by burdik: Mar 12 2013, 15:14
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Mar 12 2013, 17:20
|
Tenboro

|
QUOTE(burdik @ Mar 12 2013, 13:38)  I think have something like that, only for Quality metric now Well no, quality works fundamentally differently by measuring the actual failure rate of your client. And because the system has user-specific exclusion lists for H@H clients that don't appear to be reachable for that specific user, a quality drop is a very strong indication of a connectivity, routing or performance problem of some kind.
|
|
|
Mar 12 2013, 18:24
|
burdik
Newcomer
 Group: Recruits
Posts: 10
Joined: 5-May 10

|
Oh, disregard everything I posted here, seems like Quality is more reliable than I thought My Dlink went haywire with it's QoS engine, causing all the strange things lately Turned it off and both the measured speeds and latencies came to normal BTW, still [ i.imgur.com] I don't think there should be so much http 400 errors This post has been edited by burdik: Mar 12 2013, 18:47
|
|
|
Mar 13 2013, 05:58
|
Ichy
Group: Catgirl Camarilla
Posts: 13,061
Joined: 19-February 09

|
It seems everyones Score has decreased by a lot. Even mighty G just Gs Score has suffered.
|
|
|
Mar 13 2013, 10:55
|
Teana Lanster
Group: Catgirl Camarilla
Posts: 1,334
Joined: 8-July 10

|
QUOTE(Ichy @ Mar 13 2013, 11:58)  It seems everyones Score has decreased by a lot. Even mighty G just Gs Score has suffered.
My clients do not get good quality (IMG:[ invalid] style_emoticons/default/cry.gif)
|
|
|
Mar 13 2013, 12:33
|
JapaG
Group: Members
Posts: 149
Joined: 12-May 11

|
QUOTE(Ichy @ Mar 13 2013, 05:58)  It seems everyones Score has decreased by a lot. Even mighty G just Gs Score has suffered.
Yeah, I noticed. However I'm glad that my own score has stayed pretty much the same as usual, or perhaps even gotten a bit higher. Don't know if it's because my quality has stayed a constant 10K? My other client has a tendency to crash every week or two, so we'll see how much those will drop my score in the future.
|
|
|
Mar 13 2013, 13:58
|
StonyCat
Group: Catgirl Camarilla
Posts: 2,487
Joined: 31-March 12

|
QUOTE(Ichy @ Mar 13 2013, 11:58)  It seems everyones Score has decreased by a lot. Even mighty G just Gs Score has suffered.
Don't think that's severe enough to have the score halfed... and given that he uses 10Gbps servers for H@H and achieving 80MB/s for each slot, those should always be at 10000 quality. Perhaps he just got some servers down.
|
|
|
Mar 13 2013, 17:17
|
Ichy
Group: Catgirl Camarilla
Posts: 13,061
Joined: 19-February 09

|
My Client was: Last seen: 1970-01-01 00:00 (IMG:[ invalid] style_emoticons/default/laugh.gif) So I had a Client running when Tenbs Dad was still Admin here. /edit: now lets see if my 1 GBPS Monster does any good. If yes I probably kill off some of my shitty boxes and get more fast ones (IMG:[ invalid] style_emoticons/default/tongue.gif) This post has been edited by Ichy: Mar 13 2013, 17:28
|
|
|
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
|
 |
 |
 |
|